DID YOU KNOW?

ITS ALL ABOUT MY HEART!

CONDITIONED BY TRADITION

NO IMAGES, OBJECTS, OR IDOLS

CROSS WORD ETYMOLOGY

THE LATIN VULGATE

WHO WAS SAINT JEROME?

LIES OF BABYLON

ANCIENT BONES

VARIOUS PAGAN CROSSES 

THE SOUTHERN CROSS

THE CROSS OF LORRAINE

TAKE UP YOUR STAKE

INRI

SCHOLARLY RESOURCES

VIDEOS

Did You Know that the original and unadulterated Hebrew ToRaH clearly dictates that we are forbidden from creating any images or objects in the likeness of any male/female, or animal to use for worship, including any representation of a savior (as stated in ShaMuWTh 20:4 'Exodus', DaBaRiYM 4:16-18 'Deuteronomy', and LuWiYM 26 'Leviticus'). Despite this clear command, due to compromises, ignorance (not intended in a derogatory manner), and those who fear standing up for the truth, the world continues to embrace falsehoods. Furthermore, an innocent human sacrifice is explicitly prohibited and considered an abomination by the Almighty of YiSRAL, YaHuWaH (as per LuWiYM 20:1-8 'Leviticus'). However, the Christian church prominently promotes salvation through the sacrifice of an innocent, European human demigod. Those of us committed to the Hebrw ToRaH (YaHuWaH’s specific instructions to HIS chosen people Israel) would rather stand for the Creators’ truth than accept the pervasive lie embraced by the world (as stated in MaShaL 19:9 and 21:6 'Proverbs').

If you're staying quiet in the face of clear hypocrisy and disobedience within Christianity, you're contributing to the problem. Silence implies compliance.

The English Bible, as we know it, is a heavily translated and significantly diluted version of the rich history and culture of melanated Hebrew people. To truly understand the ToRaH, it's imperative that we approach them with an open mind and detach ourselves from emotional biases, and view them from the perspective of the Hebrew people. The prevailing Western mindset has led to considerable misinterpretations of the Hebrew ToRaH. This oversight has, unfortunately, led the masses to embrace false ideologies, incorrect names, misleading images, false prophets, deceptive symbols, and unauthorized methods of worship, often rooted in man-made traditions that were never commanded by the Heavenly Father YaHuWaH and did not originate with His people, the Hebrews in the ToRaH. It's worth acknowledging that the Christian New Testament contains several significant contradictions with the Hebrew ToRaH (supposedly its foundation), including approximately 400,000 scribal errors.

Considering that the Ancient Hebrews in the Hebrew ToRaH were never instructed by YaHuWaH to establish a religious framework or engage in worship involving pagan customs, holidays, imagery of men, statues, symbols, or idols representing anything or anyone, deep and impartial research brings to light a series of compelling facts. These facts make it clear that Christianity had no solid foundation to build upon. A historical exploration reveals that the Roman Catholic Church (at the Council of Nicaea), with its pagan origins, birthed various forms of solar and sun-worshiping religions, such as Astrolatry, which revolved around the movement of the sun and stars.

With a vast array of Christian denominations, numbering over 200 in the United States and a staggering 45,000 worldwide, it becomes evident why this popular, emotion-driven, personal interpretative, and truth-compromising aspect of their pagan religion continues to exert considerable influence. This is why history records the existence of numerous cultures that featured various gods and saviors, many of whom were considered demigods, born of the union between a deity and a mortal, a concept that might sound familiar, as seen in the European representation of Jesus. While many Christians profess their love and service to the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, when scrutinized closely, it becomes apparent that they tend to disregard YaHuWaH, who, in truth, is the ALuWaH (H433 mighty one) of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the Hebrews of the Bible.

After years of dedicated and impartial research, the purpose of this information is to serve as an initial point or a stepping stone for those embarking on their journey toward YaHuWaH’s ToRaH. We do not lay claim to knowing everything, but as we allocate time to seek YaHuWaH and follow HIS ToRaH, our understanding grows, and we are guided by YaHuWaH’s ToRaH. It is essential for everyone to conduct their own unbiased research and critically evaluate everything that is presented to them. Resist the impulse to react emotionally and, instead, challenge the Christian New Testament against YaHuWaH’s ToRaH by independently researching and uncovering the facts. While it's perfectly acceptable to hold a differing viewpoint on any subject matter, defending that viewpoint using one's personal opinion or emotions is ultimately futile against hard facts!

The same principle applies to the Hebrew ToRaH, and when people attempt to grasp YaHuWaH’s instructions using their ingrained Christian Westernized mindset, many tend to rely on their individual understanding because it resonates with them (MaShaL 3:5-6, "Proverbs"). If we neglect the effort to comprehend the mind of ABa YaHuWaH (through humility and study of the Hebrew ToRaH in its proper context), we may inadvertently challenge the ToRaH and assert that YaHuWaH ALuWaH (the Mighty One, but often translated as the generic title "God" in English) endorses our opinions and emotions.

10 Dying and Rising Demigods Before the Birth of Jesus Christ

These are essential facts that we should understand, and it's crucial to recognize that the Creator YaHuWaH never commanded His chosen people, the Hebrews (YiSRAL), to wear or promote the cross symbol. These are undisputed truths that all Christians and anyone claiming to follow the Bible should accept without reservation. However, if anyone contends that the Creator is entirely fine with His people, YiSRAL, wearing crosses or displaying pagan images and objects, or even tattooing them on their skin, they are essentially asserting that their interpretation of the Hebrew ToRaH supersedes that of the Creator. One of the most challenging truths to come to terms with is that you were not considered significant enough to be told the unadulterated truth. The prevalence of propaganda, misinformation, false imagery, and centuries of perpetuating inherited pagan falsehoods, particularly by those who know the truth (Christians included), allows these falsehoods to persist unchallenged. Sadly, in the Westernized culture of America, most who claim to follow the Bible are in a state of denial and disobedience concerning the Creator's commandments. In America, it is widely accepted that people can worship and call upon the Creator in their own way, but this notion contradicts the original Hebrew ToRaH of YaHuWaH. Living in America doesn't alter the fact that the Bible is fundamentally a Hebrew book.

Christian theology has conditioned its adherents to believe that the Hebrew ToRaH primarily predicts the coming of a New Testament savior figure. However, our impartial and extensive seven-month exploration of the Hebrew ToRaH consistently demonstrates that this is not the case when viewed within its authentic Hebrew context. Since it is evident that the Creator designates the Nation of YiSRAL (as per references such as ShaMuWTh 4:22-23, HuWShuWA 11:1, ZaMaR 105:1-15, and ALaPh DaBaR 16:14-22) as His anointed son and firstborn, the Christian New Testament authors have effectively replaced this identity with their narrative of a Christian New Testament salvific son or demigod. Historically, our research confirms that the concept of a savior or salvific man/demigod is deeply rooted in pagan cultures, particularly the Roman/Greek culture, and theology, which stands in heavy contrast to Hebrew culture. Christian theology strongly emphasizes that a salvific demigod has atoned for the world's sins, leading Christians to believe they need not alter their lifestyles to please the Creator and God of YiSRAL YaHuWaH, as this salvific figure purportedly rectified their transgressions and continues to intercede/rectify on their behalf, according to the Christian New Testament authors (Mark 14:62, Luke 22:69).

Many Christians are instructed to believe that what truly matters is the condition of their own hearts and NOT the change or correction of lifestyle that contradicts the Hebrew ToRaH. This is very attractive due to their belief that the death of "Jesus" permanently covers their ongoing disobedience with grace. The Babylonian concept of "once saved, always saved" is a substantial, yet incorrect doctrine that directly contradicts the teachings of the Hebrew ToRaH, upon which the New Testament and the Christian religion are founded. This widespread falsehood has discouraged individuals from being accountable to the Creator and genuinely transforming their lives. Contrary to common Christian convictions, the Hebrew ToRaH reminds us that salvation can be forfeited. The Hebrew ToRaH unequivocally states that our names can be removed from the Book of Life and that only a remnant shall return (as seen in YaShAYaHuW 10:21-23). The Hebrew ToRaH emphasizes the importance of enduring until the end, establishing that salvation is not an automatic privilege granted simply because one identifies as a Christian or attends church regularly (reflected in ZaMaR 69:26-28 “Psalms” and DaBaRiYM 29:20 “Deu”). It is essential to remember that the Creator YaHuWaH never mandated that YiSRAL become Christians or adhere to a particular religion to attain salvation or redemption.

In our contemporary society, which is often swayed by emotions and the pursuit of immediate gratification, the truth can be labeled as a lie, genuine love may be falsely labeled as hate, and evil can be mistaken for good (as described in YaShAYaHuW 5:20 “Isa”). The phrase "it's all about MY heart" is conspicuously absent in the Hebrew ToRaH, as well as in any English-translated Bible. It is crucial to recognize that we, as humans, lack the authority to unilaterally grant ourselves entry into the kingdom to come. What some individuals are essentially asserting is that their personal beliefs and intentions take precedence over the established commandments of the Heavenly Father, YaHuWaH.

After extensive and impartial research spanning numerous years, this information is intended to serve as an initial point of reference or a stepping stone for those embarking on a journey towards discovering the truth. We do not assert to possess complete knowledge, but rather, as we dedicate time to YaHuWaH (referred to as the LORD or God in English-translated Bibles), we experience growth and guidance from Him. It is essential to conduct your own impartial research and validate all information presented by others. Resist the inclination to respond emotionally; instead, seek to challenge the veracity of claims through your own unbiased research in order to establish the facts. It is entirely acceptable to hold differing viewpoints, but attempting to counter established Hebraic facts with personal opinions or emotions is futile.

The same principles apply to the Hebrew ToRaH. When attempting to comprehend Hebraic culture with our ingrained Christian and Westernized mindset, many may lean towards their own understanding simply because it feels right to them (MaShaL 3:5-6, Proverbs). Failing to invest time in understanding the mindset of YaHuWaH, through humility, the study of the Hebrew ToRaH, and the willingness to unlearn inherited misconceptions, can lead to unintentional blasphemy or the rejection of truth, all while claiming that the ALuWaH (the Mighty One) is endorsing our opinions and emotions. In the context of the Hebrew ToRaH, when one's viewpoint aligns with the ToRaH, it ceases to be mere opinion and becomes a factual assertion. If YaHuWaH has stated or enacted something, who are we to dispute it (YaShAYaHuW 55:8-13, Isaiah)? You must employ and elucidate scripture in the ToRaH to substantiate your argument, especially if it contradicts YaHuWaH's word, rather than relying on personal opinion or emotions.

Before anyone delves into the Bible, it's essential to grasp the primary foundational truth about these scriptures. The Hebrew ToRaH is the god of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob YaHuWaH's instructions to HIS chosen people the Israelites, NOT Christians. This pivotal fact levels the playing field and equips our rational minds to distinguish between the Creator’s opinion and various falsehoods added or removed to HIS opinions. As the ToRaH states in YaRaMiYaHuW 29:13 (Jeremiah), "And ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with ALL YOUR HEART". This implies a wholehearted commitment, emphasizing the need for us to engage with all of our hearts, rather than selectively reserving a portion for what we personally wish to be true. The information presented on this website is the direct outcome of years of diligent, unwavering research that has been free from personal bias, verification that extends beyond conventional educational frameworks, and extensive dialogues with individuals, including pastors, ex-pastors, and those with substantial religious experience.

The Hebrew ToRaH is a product of Hebraic culture, not European or Latin. However, these texts were significantly translated and adapted by the Roman Catholic Empire, which held pagan beliefs, leading to the formation of what is now known as the Western Bible. These manipulative changes were made to align with their pagan narratives and the newly created organized religion, Christianity. These decreed pagan ideologies and traditions were then imposed on various races conquered by Rome solidifying their religion as a worldwide authority (2.4 billion Christians today). This ongoing, deceptive illusory truth effect, akin to subliminal brainwashing, has sadly ensnared people worldwide, causing them to embrace a false reality.

When conducting unbiased study and research on the Bible, you'll discover that several English words used throughout the text carry pagan connotations related to various gods (such as theLORD, God, Christ, Jesus, and glory, to name a few). This is understandable because the Roman Catholic Empire was a diverse polycystic society. It doesn't require an expert to grasp that when words or names are translated from one language to another, nuances can be lost or added. The Scriptures have been translated, not transliterated, from the ABaRiY (Hebrew) language into English, leading to the loss of the original meaning behind Hebrew words and names. This is a violation warned against in the scriptures, and justifiably so. Altering the history of a people erases the truth and introduces falsehoods (DaBaRiYM 4:2 and 12:32, Deuteronomy). Residing in an English-speaking country, or any part of the world using various languages, does not grant anyone the right to disregard, modify, or disrespect the original cultural history of a Hebraic nation, or any cultural history, for that matter.

The ToRaH emphasizes in MaShaL 4:7 (Proverbs) the importance of gaining understanding, which involves researching and hearing all sides of any story. On the other hand, a fool shows no interest in understanding; they merely seek to hear their own opinions echoed by others (MaShaL 18:2-3, Proverbs). The most profound ignorance lies in rejecting or emotionally responding to information when you lack knowledge about the subject. The Hebrew ToRaH offers wisdom regarding hasty emotional reactions, which apply to information that may appear unpopular or contrary to personal beliefs.

The Hebrew ToRaH wisely advises against making hasty judgments without fully understanding a matter (MaShaL 18:12-15, Proverbs). Trying to assemble a puzzle without all the pieces would be imprudent because it leads to incorrect perceptions of what the puzzle is meant to depict. Don't allow ignorance, jealousy, or pride to hinder growth by rejecting the truth due to emotion or inherited traditions from the pagan Roman Catholic and Christian church system, passed down through generations. As the defends of YaHuWaH’s ToRaH, our responsibility is to share HIS truth, not impose our beliefs on others. We aim to encourage critical thinking, not to dictate your thoughts.

In the video presented below, recorded at the 2021 Truth Fellowship gathering in Florida, ACh Mike underscores the teachings of the Creator YaHuWaH regarding the heart and mind. He also offers scriptural examples of the deception related to the Father's name as it appears in the English-translated Bible.

DaBaRiYM 4:16-18 "Deuteronomy"

16 Lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the similitude of any figure, the likeness of male or female,

17 The likeness of any beast that is on the earth, the likeness of any winged fowl that flieth in the air,

18 The likeness of any thing that creepeth on the ground, the likeness of any fish that is in the waters beneath the earth:

“I wear the pentagram and cross necklace as a sentimental keepsake from my grandfather. While I acknowledge its associations with pagan, occult, and satanic symbols, my reason for wearing it is not related to those connotations.”

Those of us who proudly walk in obedience to the ToRaH understand that we are in this world but not of it. This path of the Creator’s truth is for individuals who are fully dedicated to the Creator YaHuWaH, and with this commitment often comes persecution. When we defend YaHuWaH’s commands and take a stand for HIS truth, for what is right in HIS eyes, and refuse to compromise, the masses may distance themselves because we are not like them; we don’t compromise YaHuWaH’s ToRaH to solely fit in with those who do.

The world has its own standards, shaped by the majority, but whose order are you following? YaHuWaH has a specific divine order, and one day a branch of Jesse will rise to restore order out of chaos (Isaiah 11:1-16). When people choose to disobey the Creator and do what THEY want, it is their choice and their right, but every action carries consequences. We must not fear the opinions of others or the judgment of mankind when walking in obedience to the ToRaH, for only YaHuWaH has the power to judge based on our obedience.

Regarding the cross and its representation, once again, the majority has been conditioned by tradition. However, there are those who are willing to delve deeper and look beyond the surface because they have a love for the Creator, love for knowledge, and love HIS ToRaH (Proverbs 1:28, 18-15, and Hosea 4:6). The cross is cherished and held in high regard by millions, but our Hebrew ToRaH, Western bible, and historical research has revealed that it is 'the principal symbol of the pagan Christian religion.' Contrary to popular belief, the Hebrews of ancient times neither used a cross for worship nor received any instructions from the Creator YaHuWaH to do so.

YaShAYaHuW 45:16 "Isaiah"

16 They shall be ashamed, and also confounded, all of them: they shall go to confusion together that are makers of idols.

YaShAYaHuW 42:8 "Isaiah"

8 I am YaHuWaH: that is my NAME: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images.

LuWiYM 26:1”Leviticus”

1 Ye shall make you NO idols nor graven image, neither rear you up a standing image, neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to bow down unto it: for I am YHWH your ALuWHiYM

DaBaRiYM 5:8 "Deuteronomy"

8 Thou shalt NOT make thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the waters beneath the earth

The cross symbol or image has a historical legacy of being used for conquest, warfare, and dominance over many nations. While the church has taught that the cross is a 'holy' symbol and that their savior Jesus was crucified on a cross, historical and scriptural research makes it clear that it would have actually been a tree. The cross, in its original form, represented the letter 'T' and was associated with Tammuz, the son and husband of Semiramis, the goddess of fertility and Queen of Heaven mentioned in scripture (Jeremiah 44:15-30). It is said that the Egyptians later adopted this 'T' symbol, added their fertility egg symbol on top, and called it the Ankh.

The Ankh, also known as the key of life, the key of the Nile, or the crux ansata (Latin for "cross with a handle"), is an ancient Egyptian hieroglyphic symbol that resembles a cross with a loop at the top. It is one of the most well-known and enduring symbols of ancient Egypt. The Ankh is often interpreted to represent life, immortality, and the union of male and female energies.

The loop at the top of the Ankh is believed to symbolize a woman's womb and the cross represents life. The symbol was commonly used in ancient Egyptian art and is often seen held by gods and goddesses as a symbol of their power to give and sustain life. It was also used as an amulet and was associated with the afterlife, where it represented the key to eternal life.

The Ankh is a significant symbol in Egyptian mythology and religion, and it continues to be of interest and influence in contemporary culture and spirituality.

Given this knowledge, one might question why people of melanated races continue to embrace European symbols of their deities.

False Deities Renamed and Recycled Throughout Time

 Just like all other pagan symbols, historical studies, and research once again demonstrate that crosses were present on Earth hundreds of years before the advent of Christianity and the worship of their demigod, Jesus. Throughout history, the continued use of these pagan symbols can be observed. Even Satanists have been known to wear crosses around their necks. The KKK adopted the burning cross (inspired by Constantine's vision of the flaming Chi Rho he saw in the sky) to invoke fear, and even Hitler utilized this pagan symbol to harness the powers of darkness for his conquests, to name just a few examples. Nowhere in Hebrew ToRaH do we find YaHuWaH commanding the Hebrews to carry or wear crosses (references include LuWiYM 26:1 "Leviticus," ChaBaQuWQ 2:18 "Habakkuk," ShaMuWTh 20:4-6 "Exodus," DaBaRiYM 4:16-24 "Deuteronomy," ZaMaR 97:7 "Psalms," YaShAYaHuW 44:8-11 "Isaiah," and LuWiYM 19:4 "Leviticus").

The Ku Klux Klan (KKK) is a white supremacist organization with members who identify as Christians. The KKK has a history of promoting hate, racism, and violence, and it has used Christian symbolism and rhetoric in some of its activities. However, it's essential to note that the KKK's beliefs and actions are widely considered extremist and unchristian by the broader Christian community, and many Christian denominations and leaders have condemned the KKK and its ideology. The KKK's association with Christianity is primarily a misuse of religious symbols and ideas for their own purposes.

KKK burning cross in honor of Constantine's vision "With This Sign We Shall Conquer!"

The phrase "With this sign, we shall conquer!" is associated with the Roman Emperor Constantine the Great, who openly worshiped the sun (SUNday). According to tradition, Constantine had a vision of a cross in the sky with the words "In Hoc Signo Vinces" (Latin for "By this sign, you shall conquer") before the Battle of the Milvian Bridge in AD 312.

This vision is a significant event in Christian history and is often referred to as the "Chi-Rho" vision. It is said to have led to Constantine's conversion to Christianity and his subsequent support for the Christian faith within the Roman Empire. The Chi-Rho symbol, which combines the first two letters of the Greek word for Christ (ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ), became an important Christian symbol as a result of this vision.

Constantine's embrace of Christianity had a profound impact on the history of the Christian church, as he played a role in ending the persecution of Christians and, eventually, in making Christianity the favored religion of the Roman Empire.

Impartial research reveals that the term "cross" does not originate from the Hebrew ToRaH. In biblical studies, the Greek word for "cross" is "stauros" (Strong's #G4716), which generally refers to a stake or pole. The English term "cross" comes from the Latin word "crux," which also denotes an upright beam or pole. This term evolved in the context of Roman execution methods and was not present in the original Hebrew texts of the ToRaH.

Crucifixion was a method of execution used by the Romans primarily for slaves, criminals, and individuals considered threats to Roman authority, including rebels and insurgents. It was particularly employed for those deemed to challenge the Roman order or who were of low social status. In the Christian religion, the cross is a symbol of Jesus' suffering and sacrifice. Additionally, it represents the metaphorical burden that Christians are called to bear in their commitment to follow Jesus' teachings and way of life.

The term "cross" is derived from the Latin word "crux." The Latin Vulgate, a late-4th-century Latin translation of the Bible, was translated by Saint Jerome (Eusebius Sophronius Hieronymus), a Christian priest, confessor, theologian, and historian. In 382, Pope Damasus I commissioned Saint Jerome to revise the Vetus Latina ("Old Latin") Gospels, which were in use by the Roman Church at the time. The Vulgate later became the officially endorsed version of the Bible by the Catholic Church in the 16th century.

It's essential to note that the word "cross," derived from the Latin "crux," is translated from the Greek word "stauros," which appears in the New Testament. The New Testament also uses the Greek word "xylon" to describe the wood or tree on which Jesus was crucified. These terms are found in various translations of the New Testament, including the King James Version, New International Version, and others.

Xylon:
Greek for TREE

Stauros:
Greek for WOOD

The Latin Vulgate is a late-4th-century Latin translation of the Bible, primarily translated by Saint Jerome at the request of Pope Damasus I. It became the standard version of the Bible for the Roman Catholic Church and had a profound influence on Western Christianity.

the Latin Vulgate VS the Hebrew Tanakh

• Translation Process: Saint Jerome was commissioned in 382 AD to create a standardized Latin version of the Bible. He revised the Old Latin Gospels and later translated the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) and the Greek New Testament into Latin.

• Name and Influence: The term "Vulgate" comes from the Latin word "vulgata," meaning "common" or "commonly used." It was widely adopted in the Western Christian world and remained the Catholic Church's officially promulgated Latin version of the Bible for centuries.

Accuracy Compared to the Hebrew Tanakh

Translation from Hebrew:

Jerome supposedly translated the Hebrew TaNaKh directly from Hebrew texts available in his time, rather than relying on the Greek Septuagint, which was the basis for earlier Latin translations.

• Strengths: By translating directly from Hebrew, Jerome aimed to provide a more accurate representation of the original texts.

• Weaknesses: Some errors and biases might have crept in due to the linguistic, religious, and cultural differences between Hebrew and Latin, as well as the state of the Hebrew texts available to Jerome.

Translation of the New Testament:

Jerome revised the Hebrew TaNaKh translations of the New Testament, which were based on Greek manuscripts.

• Strengths: The Vulgate’s New Testament aimed to correct inconsistencies in the Old Latin texts.

• Weaknesses: The translation process involved a degree of interpretation, which can affect the accuracy relative to the original Greek manuscripts.

Comparison with the Hebrew TaNaKh:

• Textual Fidelity: The Vulgate is generally considered a faithful translation but reflects Jerome's religious interpretations and the theological context of his time. Some differences arise due to the variations in manuscript traditions between the Hebrew Tanakh and the texts Jerome used.

• Canonical Differences: The Vulgate includes deuterocanonical books (Apocrypha) accepted by the Catholic Church but not found in the Hebrew TaNaKh.

Saint Jerome (c. 347 – 420 AD) was a Christian priest, confessor, theologian, and historian. He is best known for his translation of most of the Bible into Latin (the Vulgate) and his commentaries on the Gospels. Jerome is considered one of the Doctors of the Church and is known for his scholarly contributions to Christian theology and biblical studies.

Historical Record of Saint Jerome

Early Life and Education:

• Birthplace: Jerome was born in Stridon, a village near the border of Dalmatia and Pannonia, in what is now modern-day Croatia or Slovenia.

• Education: He received a classical education in Rome, studying Latin and Greek rhetoric, philosophy, and literature. His education also included the study of Christian texts and he was baptized there.

Religious Beliefs and Conversion:

• Christian Commitment: After an intense spiritual struggle and a profound conversion experience, Jerome committed himself fully to the Christian faith. Around 373 AD, Jerome experienced a significant spiritual crisis. According to his own accounts, while gravely ill, he had a vision that profoundly impacted his spiritual direction. In this vision, he was accused of being "Ciceronian" rather than "Christian" because of his attachment to pagan literature. This vision made him realize the importance of dedicating himself wholly to Christian studies and renouncing secular and pagan influences.

• Asceticism: He adopted an ascetic lifestyle, spending time as a hermit in the Syrian desert, where he devoted himself to study and penance. This period deeply influenced his theological perspective and commitment to monasticism.

Major Works and Contributions:

• Translation of the Bible: Jerome’s most significant contribution was the translation of the Hebrew Bible into Latin, known as the Vulgate. Commissioned by Pope Damasus I in 382 AD, Jerome sought to produce a clear and consistent Latin text by using Hebrew manuscripts for the Old Testament and Greek texts for the New Testament.

• Commentaries: Jerome wrote extensive biblical commentaries, particularly on the Prophets and the Gospels. His works reflect his profound knowledge of Hebrew and Greek and his desire to make the scriptures accessible to the Latin-speaking church.

• Letters: He wrote numerous letters that provide insight into his thoughts on theology, monasticism, and ecclesiastical matters. These letters also reveal his relationships with other key figures in the early church.

Religious Beliefs:

• Orthodox Christianity: Jerome was a staunch defender of orthodox Christian beliefs. He opposed various heresies of his time, including Arianism and Pelagianism.

• Monasticism: Jerome was a strong advocate for monasticism and the ascetic life. He believed in the importance of celibacy, poverty, and the renunciation of worldly pleasures for spiritual growth.

• Veneration of Saints: Jerome supported the veneration of saints and the importance of relics, aligning with the practices and beliefs of the early Christian church.

Legacy:

• Doctor of the Church: Jerome is recognized as one of the four original Doctors of the Church in Western Christianity, alongside Ambrose, Augustine, and Gregory the Great.

• Influence on Biblical Scholarship: His translation of the Vulgate remained the standard Bible of the Western Christian world for over a millennium. His scholarly approach and dedication to understanding the original languages of the scriptures in Hebrew have left a lasting legacy on biblical scholarship.

Many individuals are being misled by the Roman Catholic Empire's adaptation of the Hebrew ToRaH in Babylonian Christian churches around the world. Although the numbers of those affected are significant, there exists an elect group on Earth willing to embrace the ToRaH. Unfortunately, most churches fail to teach that the English translations in all Westernized English Bibles originate from Greek manuscripts that lack authenticity (Textus Deceptus). The Hebrew ToRaH states in ShaMuWTh 20:15 (Exodus), we are commanded not to steal, but by refusing to teach Scripture from the Hebrew perspective, people are not only misled but also robbed of the unadulterated truth.

The cross symbol was never intended for YaHuWaH's people, and we confidently assert that the cross is a distraction and a symbol the Creator never instructed His chosen people Israel to promote. While people are conditioned to believe that a Christian savior died on a cross, unbiased ToRaH research has revealed that the anointed one from the branch of Jesse is yet to come (refer to YaShAYaHuW Chapter 11, also known as Isaiah).

In ZaChaRiYaHuW 6:11-13 (Zechariah), it is prophesied that a Hebrew "branch" would arise from YiSRAL (Israel), specifically from the lineage (ZaRA semen/bloodline only determined by the Father) of King David. Additionally, YaShAYaHuW (Isaiah) Chapter 11 foretells that one day, the branch of Jesse will emerge to bring worldwide peace. However, upon a comprehensive examination of this chapter and cross-referencing it with the supposed fulfilled prophecies of Jesus in the Christian New Testament, several discrepancies arise.

Notably, the Hebrew ToRaH does not mention that this branch will be born of a virgin, would perform various miracles and healings, die on a cross, rise on the third day, or make a second coming for Christians. In contrast, the Hebrew ToRaH underscores that all will accept this end-time MaShiYaCh, and everyone will acknowledge and honor YaHuWaH as ALuWaH (the mighty one). According to YaShAYaHuW, when this end-time MaShiYaCh appears, wolves will coexist with lambs, leopards will lie down with deer, and calves, young lions, and the fatlings will live together in harmony.

According to the Hebrew ToRaH, the arrival of the true branch of Jesse will usher in a time when a small child can safely lead wolves, leopards, young lions, and even bears. Even the threat posed by predators like cobras and vipers will vanish. Animals like cows and bears will feed their young peacefully and lie down together, while lions will graze on straw like oxen. These are just a few of the remarkable occurrences foretold in the Hebrew ToRaH when the genuine branch of Jesse emerges.

However, when we examine the Christian New Testament, it's clear that Jesus was not universally accepted and was, in fact, rejected. Furthermore, it remains unwise to handle vipers in the wild. So, the critical question arises: Did or does the Christian New Testament messiah (Jesus, YaHuWShuWA, YaHaWaShi, YeShuWA, etc.) fulfill these prophecies? Whose words should we consider authoritative: 1) the established and unchanging, word of YaHuWaH in the Hebrew ToRaH or 2) the writings of unknown authors who assembled Greek manuscripts that frequently contradict YaHuWaH's ToRaH? Numerous unbiased scholars, teachers, and professors of the New Testament have regarded these manuscripts as non-authentic. Therefore, when it comes to the European Jesus and the Christian New Testament Messiah, we do not accept this figure, as he does not align with the teachings of YaHuWaH's word found in the Hebrew ToRaH, which supposedly forms the foundation of Christian theology.

The word tree in Greek is the word G3586 ξύλον xylon

Research indicates that "Xylon" refers to wood, which can represent a piece of wood, a tree, a post, a pillar, or a crossbeam. Historical records also show that the Romans subjected individuals to torturous acts on cruxes (G4716), which were upright stakes, poles, or beams, and not the traditional cross shapes that are commonly associated with the crucifixion.

Furthermore, insights from Dr. James Fleming, a prominent teacher of Biblical Archaeology with 37 years of experience living and teaching in Israel, reveal that Jerusalem is a city surrounded by smaller trees like olive and fig trees rather than vast forests. This raises questions about the prevalence of the tall wooden crosses depicted in certain Babylonian Christian "Jesus" films, as there is no substantial source of forested wood nearby to support such construction.

Historical research reveals that during Roman times, wood was a scarce resource in Israel, and crosses used by the Romans were typically constructed from older trees and branches. Fresh lumber was not readily available, which led to the use of existing materials for constructing crosses used in crucifixions. This practice of using older trees and branches was due to the limited availability of wood resources in the region. This method of execution was employed extensively by the Romans, subjecting hundreds of individuals to slow, painful deaths while making a public spectacle of their suffering.

Contrary to the well-finished and varnished wooden crosses we often see today, the actual crucifixions were far more horrific, terrible, and gruesome. It's probable that smaller trees were utilized or adapted to handle the numerous executions. Wooden stakes or poles were inserted into the ground along major thoroughfares to ensure maximum public exposure, which included public mockery and contempt. This brutal form of punishment served to reinforce Rome's dominion over the Hebrews (or any other race), whom they already harbored animosity toward. In accordance with Roman Law, hanging a criminal on a tree was reserved for the most serious offenses.

DaBaRiYM 21:22-23 "Deuteronomy"

22 And if a man have committed a sin worthy of death, and he be to be put to death, and thou hang him on a tree:

23 His body shall not remain all night upon the tree, but thou shalt in any wise bury him that day; (for he that is hanged is accursed of ALuWHiYM;) that thy land be not

In the above verse, the English word tree in Hebrew is H6086: עץ = AT

Crucifixion Practices in Ancient Rome: Material Constraints and Methods

Because of the scarcity of wood, the Romans would often use trees for crucifixions, with the criminal typically required to carry the crossbar or patibulum (made of wood) to the site of the crucifixion. The specific wood type used for these crosses remains unknown as no wooden remains of historical Roman crosses have survived to the present day. Crucifixions were abolished by Emperor Constantine in the 4th century, approximately three hundred years after the reported death of Jesus Christ.

In Jerusalem, common wood types included Jerusalem Pine, Mediterranean Cypress, Olive, and Red River Gum. Olive trees were rarely if ever, used for building because of their oily wood, making them heavy, extremely strong, and highly prized. Red River Gum, a type of eucalyptus tree, was not suitable due to its slightly poisonous nature, especially if ingested. Its wood could also be brittle, posing difficulties for construction.

Cypress is a potential candidate for making crosses as it was used in various constructions and had a pleasant scent. Pine, on the other hand, was abundant, cost-effective, robust, and easy to work with. It was utilized for foundational work in King Solomon's temple and is still employed globally in construction. Although it's not known for its aesthetics, it is a durable wood, making it a practical choice for crafting crosses.

Olive trees were prevalent in southern Palestine, known as Judaea during Roman times. The cultivation and importance of olive trees have persisted since ancient times. Olives and olive oil were significant in Hebrew and Greek societies for their economic and cultural value. The olive oil press industry was a thriving business in the Mediterranean world and remains important today, particularly in countries like Spain.

Crucifixions were often conducted using available materials, and the scarcity of wood in certain areas led to the use of trees as part of the crucifixion apparatus. Criminals typically carried a wooden crossbeam (patibulum) to the site of the crucifixion, where it would be affixed to an upright post, which could be a living tree. This method was practical given the available resources and the need for expediency.

Examples of books that address historical natural resource challenges include "The Historical Ecology Handbook: A Restorationist's Guide to Reference Ecosystems," edited by Dave Egan and Evelyn A. Howell. Although it does not focus solely on ancient Israel, it explores ecological challenges in various historical contexts, including the Mediterranean region, providing insight into the scarcity of wood resources.

In 1968, construction workers at Giv’at ha-Mivtar uncovered a remarkable archaeological find: a collection of bones contained in an ossuary, a type of bone box. Among these remains was an inscription in Hebrew bearing the name "Yehohanan son of Hagakol" (H3076 YaHuWChaNaN). Astonishingly, an iron nail was still lodged within his calcaneus (heel bone). These ossuaries, including Yehohanan's, were carefully placed within a tomb complex composed of two chambers and 12 burial niches.

This complex dates back to the Roman period, spanning from the first century B.C. to the first century A.D. Notably, the iron nail retrieved from Yehohanan's remains bore traces of olive wood particles. This suggests that he may have been crucified on a rudimentary olive wood cross or tree. Below, you can see Yehohanan's heel bone, along with the iron nail that was discovered.

In 1970, Nicu Haas, a scholar associated with the Department of Anatomy at Hebrew University, published a notable piece in the Israel Exploration Journal concerning the remains of Yehohanan. His interpretation regarding the positioning of the body on the cross can be summarized as follows:

The feet were placed in a nearly parallel alignment, both penetrated by a single nail at the heels. The legs were positioned closely adjacent to each other, with the knees bent, and the right knee overlapping the left. The torso exhibited contortions, and the upper limbs were extended outward, each of them pierced by a nail in the forearm.

— Israel Exploration Journal, Vol-20, 1970

In 1985, a reassessment of Yehohanan's crucifixion remains was conducted by Joe Zias, the curator of the Israel Department of Antiquities and Museums, and Dr. Eliezer Sekeles from the Hadassah Medical Center. Their examination led to a reconstruction that included a crossbar, which the condemned individual could carry to the execution site. This crossbar could be used repeatedly, attaching it to a permanently fixed upright stake in the ground.

The reconstruction was based on available skeletal evidence, insights from Nicu Haas, and historical sources from antiquity. These sources revealed that the condemned person did not carry the entire cross, contrary to common belief. Instead, the crossbar was borne by the individual, while the upright was already positioned in a fixed location, serving for subsequent executions. Moreover, historical accounts, including those of Josephus, indicate that during the first century C.E., wood was so scarce in Jerusalem that the Romans had to travel ten miles from the city to obtain timber for their siege machinery. (Flavius Josephus, Wars of the Jews 5.522 -23).

As a result, it is reasonable to infer that the scarcity of wood during that period could have influenced the economics of crucifixion, leading to the repeated use of both the crossbar and the upright stake. This potential scarcity and the absence of significant injuries to the forearm and hand metacarpals suggest that the condemned individuals' arms were often tied rather than nailed to the cross.

A wealth of literary and artistic evidence supports the use of ropes rather than nails to secure the condemned to the cross. In Egypt, considered by some sources as one of the origins of crucifixion, victims were tied rather than nailed to the cross. It is essential to note that death by crucifixion resulted from the manner in which the condemned person hung from the cross, rather than from traumatic injuries caused by nailing. Hanging from the cross initiated a painful process of asphyxiation, where the two muscle groups involved in breathing, the intercostal muscles and the diaphragm, gradually weakened. Eventually, the condemned person succumbed due to their inability to maintain proper breathing.

ShaMuWTh 20:4 "Exodus"

4 Thou shalt NOT make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:
 

It is often observed that the branches of a tree spread out in a manner that can be likened to arms reaching up to the sky, resembling the shape of the letter “Y.” Frequently, debates arise in discussions with Christians about whether Jesus (aka YaHuWShuWA, YaHaWaShi, YeShuWA, etc,) died on a tree or a cross, but this often serves as a distraction. The crucial point is that determining the exact method of Jesus's execution, whether on a cross or a tree, is irrelevant to Israel’s salvation. It's perfectly valid to seek a deeper understanding of history and scriptures, a pursuit we should all pursue. However, engaging in heated arguments, rather than constructive discussions aimed at edification, over non-salvation issues is counterproductive.

We must exercise caution and not expend all our energy on matters that won't impact our salvation. Instead, we should concentrate on living a QaDaSh (set-apart) life devoted to YaHuWaH’s ToRaH. The bottom line is that YaHuWaH never commanded us to wear or venerate crosses, pieces of wood, or any symbols for worship. Our salvation, forgiveness, and redemption come through obeying YaHuWaH's ToRaH and stopping all forms of idol worship. If we claim to walk in truth, we must embrace the complete truth, not just our own version of truth or the aspects that make us comfortable.

All we need to do is look to the Hebrew ToRaH since it is YaHuWaH’s instructions to His chosen people. According to the Creator YaHuWaH (NOT men or religion) HIS anointed firstborn son is the Nation of YiSRAL (Israel) and NOT a single person (ShaMuWTh 4:22-23 "Exodus”, HuWShuWA 11:1 "Hosea", ZaMaR 105:1-15 “Psalm” and ALaPh DaBaR 16:14-22 "1 Chronicle"). This beautiful insight immediately dismantles all ideologies of a salvific New Testament messiah. This is why it’s critical to compare the Hebrew ToRaH (the established foundation) against the Christian New Testament. If we are YaHuWaH’s witnesses, then we must ask like his witnesses and share HIS truth (NOT Christianity's watered-down truth).

YaShAYaHuW 43:10-11 “Isaiah”

10 Ye are my witnesses, saith YaHuWaH, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was NO ALuWaH formed, neither shall there be after me.

11 I, even I, am YaHuWaH; and beside me there is NO SAVIOUR.

YaShAYaHuW 49:26 “Isaiah”

26 And I will feed them that oppress thee with their own flesh; and they shall be drunken with their own blood, as with sweet wine: and all flesh shall know that I YaHuWaH am thy SAVIOUR and thy REDEEMER, the mighty One of Jacob.

ZaMaR 27:1 “Psalm”

27 YaHuWaH is my light and my SALVATION; whom shall I fear? YaHuWaH is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?

MaKhiYaHuW 7:7 “Micah”

7 Therefore I will look unto YaHuWaH; I will wait for the ALuWaH of my SALVATION: my ALuWaH will hear me.

BaT ShaMuWAL 22:47 “2 Samuel”

47 YaHuWaH liveth; and blessed be my rock; and exalted be the ALuWaH of the rock of my SALVATION.

The Kemetic symbol often associated with eternal life is the Ankh, not specifically a 'womb.' The Ankh, also known as the 'key of life' or 'cross with a handle,' is an ancient Egyptian hieroglyphic symbol that represents life and immortality. While the concept of the womb is important in many cultures for its association with creation and life, it is not specifically represented as a symbol of eternal life in Kemetic (ancient Egyptian) symbolism.

Historical research indicates that the cross has been used as a symbol in various cultures and religions before the advent of Christianity. Many ancient civilizations, including the Egyptians, incorporated cross-like symbols. The 'T' symbol, associated with the pagan deity Tammuz, and the Egyptian Ankh, a symbol of life, are examples. The use of the cross in Christian symbolism became more prominent after the 4th century CE, following the Roman Emperor Constantine's adoption of Christianity. The Roman Catholic Church's widespread use of the cross as a symbol became more established in the centuries following Constantine.

A 2,000-year-old swastika/cross has been a symbol used in Buddhism and Hinduism. It's important to clarify that the Buddha had no association with Nazism. Instead, the cross on the chest is believed to represent "prosperity and good fortune. Some early Christians in North Africa were hesitant to adopt the cross symbol due to its associations with various pre-Christian cultures. Historically, the cross or cross-like symbols were utilized by civilizations such as the Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans, often for purposes of religion or conquest.

For instance, the swastika, a cross with arms bent at right angles, has been a symbol in Hinduism and Buddhism for thousands of years. It was later appropriated by the Nazi regime in the 1930s as a symbol of Aryan identity. Additionally, the Ku Klux Klan, a white supremacist group, used burning crosses to intimidate African Americans and other groups opposed to their ideology. Given these historical contexts, some argue for a careful examination of symbols and their meanings, advocating for the removal of items considered abominable by their religious beliefs.

Various pagan crosses throughout history

The Southern Cross, known as Crux, is a prominent constellation in the Southern Hemisphere. It is one of the smallest but most distinctive constellations, consisting of four primary stars that form a cross shape. This constellation has significant historical, navigational, and cultural importance.

Characteristics and Significance

1. Visibility: Crux is visible predominantly in the Southern Hemisphere and is best seen from locations south of the equator. It is easily recognizable due to its distinct cross shape.

2. Navigation: Historically, Crux has been used for navigation. The constellation points toward the South Celestial Pole, making it an essential reference for explorers and sailors in the Southern Hemisphere.

3. Cultural Importance: Crux holds cultural significance for various indigenous peoples of the Southern Hemisphere, particularly in Australia, New Zealand, and South America. It is featured on several national flags, including those of Australia and New Zealand, symbolizing guidance and national identity.

4. Stars: The main stars of Crux are Acrux (Alpha Crucis), Mimosa (Beta Crucis), Gacrux (Gamma Crucis), and Delta Crucis. These stars form the cross's shape, with Acrux being the brightest.

The most common symbols found atop Christian church buildings are crosses, which represent the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, and sometimes other Christian symbols such as the fish (Ichthys), doves, or steeples.

research and Evidence

1. Church Architecture:

   • The architectural design of churches often incorporates symbols central to Christian theology and liturgy. The cross is the most prevalent symbol, signifying Christ's sacrifice and the core of Christian faith.

2. Symbolism in Christianity:

   • The symbols used in Christian churches are derived from theological and biblical sources, not typically from astronomical constellations.

3. Southern Cross in Cultural Context:

   • While the Southern Cross (Crux) is a significant cultural and navigational symbol in the Southern Hemisphere, it does not have a prominent place in Christian liturgical or architectural symbolism.

4. National and Cultural Use:

   • The Southern Cross is prominently featured in the flags of countries like Australia and New Zealand, symbolizing geographical and cultural identity rather than religious symbolism.

Conclusion

Churches primarily use symbols that have direct theological significance to Christianity, such as the cross, which represents the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. The Southern Cross is more of a cultural and navigational symbol in the Southern Hemisphere, without a central role in Christian church architecture.

The Southern Cross, or Crux, is an astronomical constellation visible in the Southern Hemisphere and is not of Hebrew origin. While it has been used in various cultural contexts, it is not historically associated with the cross of the Zodiac or as a symbol of the four seasons, equinoxes, and solstices. The constellation has been significant in navigation and astronomy rather than in symbolic or religious contexts.

Various false images depicting a Christ with a pagan cross and sun rays behind his head

The depiction of sun rays or a halo behind the head of Jesus in Christian art is a symbolic representation of divinity and holiness. This iconography has its origins in earlier artistic traditions and religious symbolism.

1. Symbol of Divinity and Sanctity: In Christian art, the halo, also known as a nimbus, signifies the holiness, divinity, and glory of the figure. It is a visual representation of spiritual radiance and sanctity.

2. Influence of Earlier Cultures: The use of halos or radiant crowns predates Christianity and can be traced back to ancient Greek and Roman art, where gods and important figures were depicted with a radiant crown or nimbus to signify their divine nature. Similar iconography is found in Hindu and Buddhist art, where enlightened beings are shown with halos.

3. Adoption in Christian Art: Early Christian artists adopted the halo to emphasize the divine nature of Jesus and other holy figures. This symbolism was meant to convey their spiritual significance and set them apart from ordinary humans.

The Hebrew TaNaKh does not describe sun rays or halos behind any of the chosen prophets. The concept of a halo or sun rays as a symbol of divinity or holiness originates from other cultural and religious traditions, such as Greco-Roman, Hindu, and Buddhist art, and was later adopted into Christian iconography.

If the cross is considered a sacred symbol reserved for dedicated Christians, then why do so many individuals leading secular lives proudly display this symbol? The reason is that they share a common worldly spirit.

PAGAN CROSS SLIDESHOW

When you delve beneath the superficial layers, uncover the deceptive veils, and earnestly study YaHuWaH's Hebrew ToRaH, your understanding can be enlightened. It's possible to liberate your mind if one desires to break free from the darkness and confusion. 

 THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY

THE CROSS OF LORRAINE

The Cross of Lorraine, also known as the patriarchal cross, is a Christian symbol featuring two horizontal bars intersecting a single vertical line. The upper bar is typically shorter than the lower one, although variations with equal-length bars also exist. The name 'Lorraine' is associated with this cross due to its use by the Dukes of Lorraine in France. The cross has historical and cultural significance in various contexts, including its use as a symbol of Free France during World War II.

The term 'ORAIOS' is an ancient Greek word meaning 'beautiful' or 'graceful' and is not related to the Egyptian Uraeus serpent. The Uraeus is a symbol of sovereignty, represented by a rearing cobra, associated with the goddess Wadjet in Egyptian mythology. The Egyptian word 'Ra' (or 'Re') refers to the sun god and is not related to the Greek word 'ORAIOS.' The connection between 'OREO' cookies and the Egyptian name for the sun ('Re') is a modern myth without historical basis.

The Cross of Lorraine is indeed featured in the logo of the American Lung Association. However, the claim that the logo is present in the Nabisco, Exxon, or Hallmark. The Cross of Lorraine, with its two horizontal bars, is a symbol historically associated with the Duchy of Lorraine and has been used in various contexts, including as a symbol of Free France during World War II.

 The unfortunate reality is that many pastors, both in mega-churches and local congregations, claim to represent the LORD (H1168 BaAL), but their actions reveal a disregard for the ToRaH. The hard, undeniable truth is that a significant number of pastors and Christian leaders choose not to teach YaHuWaH’s ToRaH. Instead, many enter this role for financial gain, personal recognition, professional status, or as a family tradition passed down through generations. Their motivations often revolve around worldly pursuits rather than sincere concern for the well-being of their congregants' souls.

If these pastors genuinely cared, they would courageously teach the unadulterated truth of the Hebrew ToRaH and let the congregation decide, regardless of potential backlash or opposition. Who granted pastors the authority to decide whether someone is deserving of the truth? It can be disheartening to realize that you may not have been considered significant enough to be entrusted with the truth. True pastors would challenge individuals to undergo a profound transformation of their lives and relinquish their selfish and worldly behaviors, rather than justifying ongoing sin and spiritual infidelity, such as participation in pagan holidays that the Creator despises. Regrettably, many modern-day pastors are perpetuating a cycle of history akin to that of false prophets in ancient times.

YaRaMiYaHuW 14:14 "Jeremiah"

14 Then YaHuWaH said unto me, The prophets prophesy lies in my name: I sent them NOT, neither have I commanded them, neither spake unto them: they prophesy unto you a false vision and divination, and a thing of nought, and the deceit of their heart.

For those who seek to honor the Creator, YaHuWaH, the path of obedience calls for a distinct separation. Unlike the practices of mainstream Christianity, embracing the ToRaH requires genuine sacrifice. It necessitates setting yourself apart, even if it means standing alone, facing unpopularity within your own household, and enduring persecution for the sake of the true name of the Creator. It entails forsaking the corrupted pagan holidays, which are viewed by YaHuWaH as a form of spiritual adultery. Embracing the ToRaH mandates self-denial and the willingness to lead your family, friends, and even pastors toward the ToRaH.

Contrary to the ease of mainstream Christianity, walking in according to the ToRaH can be a challenging journey. However, with a humble heart, you can ask YaHuWaH for the strength and obedience needed for change. Not everyone will be receptive to the ToRaH, but remember that their disbelief cannot determine your eternal destiny. YaHuWaH's truth can be tough to accept, but it is the reality that many churches hesitate to convey. In the end, it is YaHuWaH's way, and to achieve the kingdom to come, we must follow His rules.

The Creator will NEVER override a person’s free will as it is a gift. YaHuWaH's love for us grants the freedom to willingly choose to love and obey Him as is stated in the Hebrew ToRaH (Deuteronomy 30:15-20). He doesn't desire robotic or compelled praise. Instead, He desires a genuine, heartfelt devotion, just as no one wishes to be celebrated out of obligation. That's how the Creator views our worship – it should come from a place of sincere love and devotion.

People can deny or reject the truth, but this doesn't change the FACT that its still the truth...

The letters 'INRI' represent the Latin title that Pontius Pilate affixed above the head of Jesus during his crucifixion. Latin was the official language of the Roman Empire, and the inscription read "Iesvs Nazarenvs Rex Ivdaeorvm." In Latin, 'I' was used in place of the English 'J,' and 'V' represented 'U.' Thus, in English, it translates to "Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews." Early Christians adopted the initial letters of this inscription, 'INRI,' as a symbol, and over the centuries, 'INRI' has appeared in numerous paintings depicting the crucifixion.

The Greek alphabet incorporated a variant of the Phoenician letter known as 'Yodh,' which became the letter 'iota' (Ι, ι), representing the /i/ sound. This adaptation influenced the Old Italic alphabet, including Latin. In Latin, 'I' was used to represent both the /i/ and /j/ sounds. The modern letter 'J' evolved from a variation of 'I,' and until the 16th century, both 'I' and 'J' were used interchangeably for both vowel and consonant sounds. The diacritical mark placed over the lowercase 'i' is called a 'tittle.'

In the Turkish alphabet, the dotted 'İ' and the dotless 'I' are distinct letters, each representing different vowel sounds. The dotted 'İ' (uppercase 'İ' and lowercase 'i') represents a front vowel, while the dotless 'I' (uppercase 'I' and lowercase 'ı') represents a back vowel.

the term "cross" and its historical development:

1. Strong’s Concordance - This resource provides definitions and references for biblical terms, including "stauros" (Strong's #G4716), which is translated as "cross" in the New Testament.

   • Strong's Concordance

2. "The New Brown-Driver-Briggs-Gesenius Hebrew-English Lexicon" - This lexicon provides detailed meanings of Hebrew words, including the absence of terms related to the cross in the Torah.

   • Hendrickson Publishers

3. "A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature" by Walter Bauer - This lexicon offers in-depth definitions and historical usage of Greek terms such as "stauros."

   • University of Chicago Press

4. "The Origin of the Cross: A History of the Symbol" by F.J. McDonald - This book explores the historical development of the cross symbol and its origins in Roman and Latin traditions.

   • Gorgias Press

5. "The Cross: History, Art, and Religion" by Robert L. Wilken - This work examines the historical and religious significance of the cross, including its evolution from Roman practices.

   • University of Notre Dame Press

crucifixion in Roman times:

1. "The Roman Crucifixion: The Cross and Its History" by Martin Hengel - This work provides a comprehensive analysis of crucifixion in Roman times, including its use and implications.

   • Fortress Press

2. "Crucifixion in the Ancient World and the Folly of the Message of the Cross" by Jonathan D. T. G. Johnson - This book explores the historical context and use of crucifixion in the Roman Empire.

   • Oxford University Press

3. "Roman Crucifixion and the Cross" by Bruce Riley - This resource discusses the historical and social contexts of crucifixion practices in ancient Rome.

   • Cambridge University Press

4. "The Death of Jesus: Under the Cross" by John Dominic Crossan - This book examines the significance and historical context of crucifixion, including its use by the Romans.

   • HarperOne

symbolism of the cross in Christianity:

1. "The Cross of Christ" by John Stott - This book explores the significance of the cross in Christian theology, including its symbolism and implications for Christian life.

   • InterVarsity Press

2. "Cruciformity: Paul's Narrative Spirituality of the Cross" by Michael J. Gorman - This work discusses how the cross shapes Christian discipleship and the understanding of bearing one's cross.

   • Eerdmans Publishing

3. "The Crucifixion: Understanding the Death of Jesus Christ" by Fleming Rutledge - This book provides a comprehensive examination of the theological and historical significance of the crucifixion.

   • Eerdmans Publishing

4. "The Theology of the Cross: Reflections on His Cross and Ours" by Charles B. Cousar - This text delves into the theological implications of the cross and its meaning for Christians.

   • Westminster John Knox Press

the Latin Vulgate translation:

1. "Jerome: His Life, Writings, and Controversies" by J.N.D. Kelly - This biography provides an in-depth look at Saint Jerome, his works, and his translation of the Vulgate.

   • Harper & Row

2. "The Vulgate Bible: Douay-Rheims Translation" by Richard Challoner - This edition offers insights into the translation process and the historical significance of the Vulgate.

   • Baronius Press

3. "The Latin New Testament: A Guide to Its Early History, Texts, and Manuscripts" by H.A.G. Houghton - This guide explores the history and development of Latin translations of the Bible, including Jerome’s Vulgate.

   • Oxford University Press

4. "The Early Text of the New Testament" edited by Charles E. Hill and Michael J. Kruger - This collection of essays discusses the early versions and translations of the New Testament, including the role of Jerome's Vulgate.

   • Oxford University Press

"stauros" and "xylon" and their translation:

1. "The Cross of Christ" by John Stott - This book explores the theological significance of the cross and its representation in the New Testament.

   • InterVarsity Press

2. "A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature" by Walter Bauer - This lexicon provides definitions and historical usage of Greek terms such as "stauros" and "xylon."

   • University of Chicago Press

3. "The New Strong's Expanded Dictionary of Bible Words" by James Strong - This reference provides insights into the Greek and Hebrew words used in the Bible, including "stauros" and "xylon."

   • Thomas Nelson

4. "The Crucifixion in the Ancient World and the Folly of the Message of the Cross" by Martin Hengel - This book examines the historical context and significance of the crucifixion, including the terminology used.

   • Fortress Press

Latin translations of the Hebrew Tanakh:

1. "Jerome's Hebrew Philology" by Michael Graves - This book examines Jerome’s translation techniques and his use of Hebrew sources.

   • Oxford University Press

2. "The Vulgate Bible: Douay-Rheims Translation" by Richard Challoner - Offers insights into the translation process and the historical significance of the Vulgate.

   • Baronius Press

3. "The Latin New Testament: A Guide to Its Early History, Texts, and Manuscripts" by H.A.G. Houghton - Explores the history and development of Latin translations of the Bible, including Jerome’s Vulgate.

   • Oxford University Press

4. "The Text of the Old Testament: An Introduction to the Biblia Hebraica" by Ernst Würthwein - Provides an overview of the Hebrew Bible's textual history, useful for comparing with the Vulgate.

   • Eerdmans Publishing

historical use of the cross symbol by non-Hebrew cultures:

1. Archaeological Discoveries: Studies of archaeological artifacts, such as carvings, inscriptions, and artwork, can provide evidence of the cross symbol's use in different cultures. Archaeological publications and reports often document such discoveries.

2. Cultural and Religious Studies Books: Books on the history of symbolism, religious iconography, and cross-cultural interactions may discuss the cross symbol's significance in various cultures. Examples include "The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion" edited by Timothy Insoll and "The Cross: History, Art, and Controversy" by Robin M. Jensen.

3. Academic Journals: Journals in the fields of archaeology, anthropology, religious studies, and art history frequently publish articles on the cross symbol's usage in different cultures. Journals such as "Antiquity," "World Archaeology," or "Art Bulletin" may contain relevant research articles.

4. Museum Collections and Exhibitions: Museums often house collections of artifacts and artworks that feature the cross symbol from various cultures. Visiting museums or exploring their online collections can provide visual examples and historical context.

5. Online Resources: Websites of reputable academic institutions, museums, and cultural organizations may provide access to articles, publications, and resources related to the cross symbol's historical usage in non-Hebrew cultures.

By consulting these sources, you can learn more about the cross symbol's significance in diverse cultural contexts throughout history.

cross symbol in both pagan and Christian contexts:

1. "The Cross: History, Art, and Controversy" by Robin M. Jensen

   • This book provides an extensive history of the cross as a symbol in both pre-Christian and Christian contexts.

   • Harvard University Press

2. "The Origin of the Cross" in The Harvard Theological Review

   • This academic journal article discusses the historical origins and uses of the cross symbol in various cultures before its adoption by Christianity.

   • Available through academic databases like JSTOR or university libraries.

3. "Pagan Symbols of the Cross" by Sir Grafton Elliot Smith

   • A study that delves into the various uses of cross symbols in ancient pagan cultures, including their meanings and significance.

   • Internet Archive

4. "Christianizing the Roman Empire: (A.D. 100-400)" by Ramsay MacMullen

   • This book discusses the transition of symbols, including the cross, from pagan to Christian use during the Roman Empire's conversion to Christianity.

   • Yale University Press

5. "Constantine the Great: Warlord of Rome" by Elizabeth James

   • Provides context on Emperor Constantine's influence on the adoption of Christian symbols, including the cross, within the Roman Empire.

   • Pen and Sword History

origins of Greek and Egyptian terms and symbols:

1. "The Greek-English Lexicon" by Liddell and Scott

   • This lexicon provides definitions and explanations of ancient Greek words, including 'ORAIOS.'

   • Clarendon Press

2. "The Oxford Essential Guide to Egyptian Mythology" edited by Donald B. Redford

   • This guide includes information on Egyptian symbols such as the Uraeus and deities like Ra (Re).

   • Oxford University Press

3. "The Complete Gods and Goddesses of Ancient Egypt" by Richard H. Wilkinson

   • This book provides an overview of Egyptian deities and symbols, including the Uraeus and Ra.

   • Thames & Hudson

ancient Egyptian symbols and their meanings:

1. "The Complete Gods and Goddesses of Ancient Egypt" by Richard H. Wilkinson

   • This book provides detailed explanations of ancient Egyptian symbols, including the Ankh and its significance.

   • Thames & Hudson

2. "The Oxford Essential Guide to Egyptian Mythology" edited by Donald B. Redford

   • This guide includes comprehensive information on Egyptian symbols and their meanings.

   • Oxford University Press

3. "The Hieroglyphs Handbook: Teach Yourself Ancient Egyptian" by Philip Ardagh and Hilary Wilson

   • This book provides insights into various hieroglyphs, including the Ankh, and their interpretations.

   • Chronicle Books

the origins of the Southern Cross constellations:

1. "Star Names: Their Lore and Meaning" by Richard H. Allen

   • This book provides detailed explanations of the origins and significance of various constellations, including the Southern Cross (Crux).

   • Dover Publications

2. "The Southern Cross: The Crux of the Matter" by Raymond H. Stoner

   • This article discusses the historical and navigational significance of the Southern Cross.

   • Journal of Navigation

3. "The Cultural History of the Southern Cross" by P.G. Maxwell-Stuart

   • This book explores the cultural and historical significance of the Southern Cross constellation.

   • ABC Books

Church Architecture:

• Source: "The Gothic Cathedral: Origins of Gothic Architecture and the Medieval Concept of Order" by Otto Georg von Simson. This book explores the symbols and architecture of churches, emphasizing the cross and other common Christian motifs.

• Oxford University Press

• Source: "Symbols of the Christian Faith" by Alva William Steffler. This book details the various symbols used within Christian worship and architecture.

• Eerdmans Publishing

• Source: "The Southern Sky Guide" by David Ellyard and Wil Tirion. This guide discusses the cultural significance of the Southern Cross but does not link it to Christian church architecture.

• Cambridge University Press

• Source: "Flags of the World: An Illustrated Guide to Contemporary Flags" by Alfred Znamierowski. This reference book provides details on the use of the Southern Cross in national symbols.

• DK Publishing

crosses, material, and ancient usage:

Scarcity of Wood and Use of Trees for Crucifixions:

• It is true that the scarcity of wood in certain areas led the Romans to use existing trees for crucifixions.

• Source: Hengel, Martin. "Crucifixion in the Ancient World and the Folly of the Message of the Cross." Fortress Press, 1977. This book provides detailed accounts of crucifixion practices in the Roman world.

Carrying the Crossbar (Patibulum):

• The condemned would typically carry the crossbar (patibulum) to the site of the crucifixion.

• Source: Edwards, William D., Wesley J. Gabel, and Floyd E. Hosmer. "On the Physical Death of Jesus Christ." JAMA, 1986. This study explains the medical and historical aspects of crucifixion, including the carrying of the patibulum.

Wood Type Used for Crosses:

• The specific wood types used are unknown, and no wooden remains of historical Roman crosses have survived.

• Source: Davies, J. G. "The Cross in the Crucifixion." The Expository Times, 1965. This article discusses the materials used for crucifixion crosses.

Abolition of Crucifixion by Constantine:

• Emperor Constantine abolished crucifixion in the 4th century.

• Source: Eusebius of Caesarea. "Life of Constantine." This primary source document details Constantine's reign and his reforms, including the abolition of crucifixion.

skeletal remains, including the crucifixion evidence:

1. Zias, J. & Sekeles, E. (1985). "The Crucified Man from Giv‘at ha-Mivtar: A Reappraisal." Israel Exploration Journal, 35(1), 22-27.
   This study reexamines the findings of the crucified man and provides a detailed analysis of the evidence and its significance.

2. Tzaferis, V. (1970). "Jewish Tombs at and near Giv'at ha-Mivtar." Israel Exploration Journal, 20(1/2), 18-32.
   This article provides a comprehensive overview of the tomb complex where Yehohanan's ossuary was found, offering insights into the burial practices and historical context.

3. Kuhn, K. G. (1973). "The Crucifixion of Jesus: The Evidence." Journal of the American Medical Association, 224(4), 382-384.
   This medical and historical analysis includes a discussion on the archaeological findings related to Roman crucifixion methods, including the case of Yehohanan.

4. Haas, N. (1970). "Anthropological Observations on the Skeletal Remains from Giv'at ha-Mivtar." Israel Exploration Journal, 20(1/2), 38-59.

historical and linguistic background of the letters 'INRI:

1. "The Early Text of the New Testament" edited by Charles E. Hill and Michael J. Kruger, discusses the textual traditions and history of early Christian writings.

2. "The Greek and Latin Inscriptions of Caesarea Maritima" by Clayton Miles Lehmann, which includes an analysis of Latin inscriptions in the context of Roman Judea.

3. "The World's Writing Systems" edited by Peter T. Daniels and William Bright, provides an overview of the development and evolution of writing systems, including Greek and Latin.

4. "A History of the Greek Alphabet" by Leonard R. Palmer, explores the origins and development of the Greek alphabet from Phoenician.

5. "The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire" by Edward Gibbon, provides context on the Roman Empire and its languages.

6. "Orthography and Phonology: The letter 'I' and 'J'" from academic journals that discuss the historical evolution of these letters in Latin and their impact on modern alphabets.

sun rays and halos origins:

1. "The Jewish Study Bible" - This comprehensive resource provides annotations and explanations of the Hebrew Bible, confirming the absence of such imagery in the Hebrew scripture.

2. "The Oxford Dictionary of Jewish Religion" edited by R.J. Zwi Werblowsky and Geoffrey Wigoder - This dictionary covers various aspects of Jewish religion, including art and iconography, and confirms the lack of halo imagery.

3. "Biblical Images: Men and Women of the Bible in Art" by Adolfo Roitman - This book explores representations of biblical figures in art, noting the differences between Jewish and Christian artistic traditions.

4. "Judaism and Art: A Study in Jewish Cultural History" by Gabrielle Sed-Rajna - This work discusses Jewish art and its distinct characteristics, including the absence of halos or sun rays in depictions of prophets.

5. "Iconography of Christian Art" by Gertrud Schiller - Although focused on Christian art, this book provides context on the origins of the halo and its absence in earlier Jewish art traditions.

Unlearn, Deprogram, and Re-think EVERYTHING you were taught!

We don't claim to be self-professed prophets, teachers, leaders, or mentors and are not part of any clique, sect, or recruitment center. The resources mentioned on our website and YouTube channel, such as Strong's Concordance, Encyclopedia Britannica, the dictionary, word etymology, scholarly resources, etc., serve as tools for a broader perspective. Nonetheless, our ultimate trust remains in the unchanging ToRaH of the Creator and God of Israel. We always encourage everyone to measure all opinions against the unchanging ToRaH of the Creator and God of Israel.

There is no commandment in the Hebrew ToRaH from the God of Israel stating that all Israelites must pray through someone to commune with Him. Instead, the Hebrew TaNaKh emphasizes direct communication between individuals and YaHuWaH, without the need for intermediaries.

Ezekiel 18:30-32

30 Therefore I will judge you, O house of Israel, every one according to his ways, saith the YaHuWaH God. Repent, and turn yourselves from all your transgressions; so iniquity shall not be your ruin.

31 Cast away from you all your transgressions, whereby ye have transgressed; and make you a new heart and a new spirit: for why will ye die, O house of Israel?

32 For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith YaHuWaH God: wherefore turn yourselves, and live ye.

BaT DaBaR 7:14 “2 Chronicles” Hebrew TaNaKh

14 When my people, who bear MY NAME humble themselves, pray, and seek my favor and TURN from their evil ways; I will hear in my heavenly abode, and FORGIVE their sins, and will heal their land.

 MaKhiYaH 6:8 “Micah”

8 He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth YaHuWaH require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy ALuWaH?

ZaMaR 119:10-11 “Psalm”

10 With my whole heart have I sought thee: O let me not wander from thy commandments.

11 Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee.