WHY TORAH BASED INFORMATION MATTERS

REGARDING HERESY CLAIMS

REGARDING YHWH

REGARDING THE HOLIDAYS

REGARDING SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS

REGARDING FELLOWSHIP

REGARDING PROSELYTIZING

REGARDING ISAIAH

REGARDING PROSPERITY

REGARDING THE NEW TESTAMENT MESSIAH

GENERAL QUESTIONS

NEW TESTAMENT CONTRADICTIONS

REGARDING HEBREW

REGARDING PROPHECY

REGARDING RELATIONSHIPS

REGARDING TATTOOS

REGARDING DEMONS

REGARDING MARRIAGE

REGARDING DIVORCE

YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, WE HAVE ANSWERS

“If you love someone, you will tell them the truth—even when it's uncomfortable. The best way to love is not to affirm a lie, but to break the delusion with truth.“

The knowledge compiled here is for anyone seeking to uncover the historical, theological, and cultural truths that have shaped religious thought and identity over time. The insights challenge mainstream narratives, particularly in the intersection of Hebrew biblical teachings, Christian doctrines, ancient history, and the misinterpretations caused by Westernized perspectives.

Our FAQ responses are designed for those who have long questioned what the God of Israel deems unchanging, in contrast to religious traditions, personal opinions, and misinterpretations. Since the Hebrew TaNaKh, also known as the Old Testament, is recognized by Hebrew and Christian scholars as the unchanging, sacred, and inspired word of the Creator, all claims must be grounded in it first, not the New Testament.

Everything has an origin. Without understanding the origin, we cannot fully comprehend the motives, behaviors, or beliefs that have developed over time. Studying the origins is essential for accurate fact-finding. It equips us with the foundational knowledge necessary to assess the validity of any opinion, claim, or ideology.

Once the foundation is established, it becomes the standard—the measuring stick—by which all other opinions, teachings, and traditions must be tested. Any process of belief or validation that bypasses this essential step of origin-based understanding is ultimately futile and unreliable.

In this light, the claim that the New Testament is a continuation of the Hebrew Bible must be examined not by popular belief or tradition, but by tracing back to the original texts, language, culture, and intent of the Hebrew Scriptures. Only then can truth be discerned and upheld with integrity.

For too long, Western culture has relied on self-proclaimed anointed pastors, teachers, and sect leaders whose teachings often contradict the unchanging word of YaHuWaH (AKA LORD in Western translated bibles), the Creator and God of Israel. However, the God of Israel has already given everything anyone needs to know to be in right standing with Him. He declares that His instructions were not delivered in secret, in darkness, or through ambiguous codes open to personal interpretation. Instead, He gave His laws openly through His chosen prophets, who were commanded to uphold and convey His word without addition or subtraction.

“I have not spoken in secret, from somewhere in a land of darkness; I have not said to Jacob’s descendants, ‘Seek me in vain.’ I, YaHuWaH, speak the truth; I declare what is right.” – Isaiah 45:19

YaHuWaH has always made His will known through His prophets, ensuring that His people receive clear and direct instructions.

“Surely the Sovereign YaHuWaH does nothing without revealing His plan to His servants the prophets.” – Amos 3:7

The only true test of any claim regarding Scripture is to measure it against the unchanging Torah of YaHuWaH, which is perfect, just, and righteous.

“The law of YaHuWaH is perfect, restoring the soul; the testimony of YaHuWaH is sure, making wise the simple.” – Psalm 19:7

The Torah requires no alterations, for it is eternal and stands as the ultimate standard of truth.

“Whatever I command you, you shall be careful to do; you shall not add to it nor take away from it.” – Deuteronomy 12:32

Only by holding to the Torah as the foundation can one distinguish truth from deception and walk in righteousness before the Creator.

“Come near to Me and listen to this: From the first announcement I have not spoken in secret; from the time it came to be, I was there. And now the Sovereign YaHuWaH has sent Me, endowed with His Spirit.” – Isaiah 48:16

YaHuWaH confirms that from the beginning, He has spoken openly, leaving no room for confusion, or personal interpretation regarding His commandments (AKA your truth).

In the above verse, YaShaYaHuW (Isaiah), the messenger of YaHuWaH, affirms that the word of the God of Israel has always been declared openly and made known from the beginning. His instructions were never hidden or reserved for a select few but were clearly revealed for all to follow. This invalidates all claims from anyone who insists they have received a message from God. Simply put, if a pastor, teacher, leader, mentor, sect leader—or even someone who invokes the name of YaHuWaH—teaches or shares on social media anything that opposes the Torah, it is not from the God of Israel. Unlike the ever-changing doctrines of man-made traditions, His Torah has remained constant, unaltered, and accessible. YaHuWaH’s prophets faithfully conveyed His words, ensuring that everyone seeking truth could understand His righteous standards and expectations.

YaHuWaH’s message has always been proclaimed openly and given through His chosen messengers, specifically His prophets (Amos 3:7). It also emphasizes that true messengers of YaHuWaH are sent by Him and operate under the guidance of His RuWaCh (Spirit)—not by their own authority or through human-appointed roles. This aligns with Deuteronomy 13:1-5, which warns against following anyone who leads people away from Torah, even if they claim to perform signs and wonders.

This is why the text is clear in Malachi—the final prophet and book of the TaNaKh that YaHuWaH would no longer appoint additional messengers to instruct Israel in matters of ToRaH observance (Malachi 4:5–6). After the book of Malachi, there is no record of YaHuWaH selecting any new prophets, with the sole exception being the promised return of ALiYaHuW (Elijah).

This is consistent with the unchanging nature of the God of Israel. Throughout the Hebrew TaNaKh, when it came to divine matters, prophets were chosen directly by YaHuWaH, not by men, self-appointment, councils, or religious institutions. This pattern underscores the importance of origin and divine selection, reinforcing that no legitimate prophetic voice arises apart from His explicit calling.

Thus, Isaiah 48:16 further affirms that YaHuWaH's Torah is unchanging, publicly declared, proudly upheld by His chosen messengers and Israel, without the need of a intermediary to spiritually make them accepted in YaHuWaH eyes, no they followed the Torah on thier own and during their time they knew theirs was no hidden or new revelations that contradict the Torah.

Isaiah 48:16 further affirms that YaHuWaH’s ToRaH is unchanging—openly declared and faithfully upheld by His chosen messengers and the nation of Israel. There was no need for an intermediary to make them spiritually acceptable in the eyes of YaHuWaH; rather, they walked in obedience to the ToRaH themselves. In their time, they knew and recognized that until ALiYaHuW returned to usher in the true mortal messiah from the seed of David, there were no hidden messages or newly introduced revelations that contradicted the foundation of the ToRaH.

Just as the God of Israel is perfect and unchanging, so too is His Torah—complete, lacking nothing, and requiring neither addition nor subtraction. This is precisely why He commands that no one, not even Himself, may alter it—because to do so would compromise His very character as faithful, trustworthy, and dependable. To suggest that His word can be revised is not only a profound disrespect, but also a direct assault on the integrity of the Creator Himself, implying that the God of Israel cannot be trusted.

1. Restoring the Original Hebrew Context

Many people today engage with religious texts through a Westernized lens, often missing the depth and meaning of the original Hebrew Torah. This information is crucial for those who want to return to an authentic understanding of YaHuWaH’s laws and expectations, rather than relying on later Christian interpretations that often distort or override the unchanging Torah principles.

2. Exposing Doctrinal Contradictions

The research highlights key contradictions between the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament, particularly regarding the identity of the Messiah, the Torah’s unchanging nature, and the practices of early Christians. Understanding these contradictions allows individuals to critically assess whether the New Testament’s depiction of Jesus (aka YeShuA, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA, etc.) aligns with the prophesied Messiah or represents a theological shift away from Torah observance.

3. Revealing Historical and Archaeological Truths

The gathered resources provide scholarly and peer-reviewed evidence on critical historical topics, such as the true ethnic identity of the ancient Israelites, the misrepresentation of Black contributions in history, and the influence of ancient pagan customs on later religious traditions. This knowledge empowers individuals to challenge historical inaccuracies and reclaim narratives that have been altered or suppressed.

4. Protecting Against Blind Acceptance of Popular Beliefs

The information serves as a safeguard against blindly following religious or cultural trends without questioning their origins. Many modern religious doctrines appeal to emotions, personal desires, or societal norms rather than factual and historical evidence. This research equips individuals with the ability to distinguish between authentic biblical teachings and man-made traditions that have been accepted without scrutiny.

5. Understanding the Impact of Western Influence on Religion

The research delves into how Westernized Christianity has reshaped the interpretation of the Hebrew Bible, often disconnecting believers from the original Hebrew perspective. By studying this, individuals can discern how cultural biases have influenced religious teachings and make informed decisions about their faith.

6. Strengthening Personal Faith and Identity

For those who seek a deeper connection with the Creator, this information reinforces the importance of obedience to Torah rather than relying on human-made doctrines. It challenges believers to re-evaluate their spiritual foundations, ensuring that their faith is rooted in truth rather than inherited traditions.

Conclusion: Knowledge That Leads to Truth

The knowledge collected here is for truth-seekers—those who refuse to accept religious claims without evidence, those who want to honor YaHuWaH according to His unchanging word, and those who value historical accuracy over popular opinion. Whether exploring biblical contradictions, historical artifacts, or the cultural impact of religious interpretations, this information is a tool for empowerment, spiritual clarity, and a return to authentic Hebrew teachings.

QUESTION: WOTR, I have watched your YouTube videos and you all seem sincere, but I have also heard others quoting various New Testament scriptures and accusing you of being heretics and liars. Could you clarify your position?

ANSWER: When you trust the unchanging Torah of the God of Israel, YaHuWaH, there is no need to debate or argue with anyone. Therefore, we allow the God of Israel’s unchanging Torah to speak and defend itself, for it is the ultimate authority. With that said, people call us (WOTR) heretics and liars because we choose to uphold only what the God of Israel says in His unchanging Torah. Our position stands in direct opposition to religious doctrines, groups, camps, sects, and social circles that add to, remove from, or contradict His commands.

This includes all who believe in, worship, or pray to intermediaries such as Jesus, YeShuA, YaHuShA, YaHuWShuWA, YaHaWaShi, and many others. Instead of proving their beliefs using the unchanging foundation of the Hebrew Torah, they rely on false accusations, emotional reactions, social media blocking, unfriending, creating videos, and seeking out like-minded groups that align with their views rather than the perspective and opinions of the God of Israel. Instead of standing on Torah, they depend on quoting New Testament passages to validate their opinions. We’ve said many times that diverse opinions are valuable and open the door to different ways of thinking. However, the question remains: do these opinions align with what the God of Israel considers unchanging?

New Testament believers are instructed not to serve two masters, yet by worshiping or praying to an intermediary like Jesus, YeShuA, YaHuShA, YaHuWShuWA, YaHaWaShi, and many others, to reach the Creator, they are doing exactly what their own doctrine warns against. In some cases, they end up serving three masters—the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. This directly clashes with the teachings of the Hebrew Bible.

This is not only a clear contradiction within the New Testament but also the Hebrew Torah as well. Matthew 6:24 states that one cannot serve two masters, yet many Christians and New Testament believers do exactly that by worshiping and praying through Jesus, YeShuA, YaHuShA, YaHuWShuWA, YaHaWaShi, and many others as an intermediary to reach the Creator. In some cases, they are serving not just two, but three masters—the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—which directly conflicts with both their own doctrine and the Hebrew Bible’s clear instructions about serving YaHuWaH only!

How This Contradicts Their Own New Testament Doctrine

1. Matthew 6:24 – "No one can serve two masters..."

   • If New Testament believers truly followed this instruction, they would worship and pray only to the Father (YaHuWaH), rather than relying on an intermediary.

2. John 4:23-24 – "True worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth..."

   • Yet many New Testament followers do not worship the Father alone or worship Him in HIS truth (the Torah) but instead worship an intermediary, elevating him as equal to or even above the Creator.

How This Clashes with the Hebrew Bible

The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) is very clear that worship and prayers must be directed only to YaHuWaH, with no intermediaries:

1. Deuteronomy 6:13-14 – "Fear YaHuWaH your mighty one, serve Him only and take your oaths in His name. Do not follow other gods..."

   • This command forbids praying to or serving anyone but YaHuWaH, making a New Testament messiah (or the Trinity) a direct violation of this law.

2. Isaiah 42:8 – "I am YaHuWaH, that is My name! I will not give My glory to another or My praise to idols."

   • Yet New Testament followers assign divine glory to an intermediary, contradicting this passage.

3. Hosea 13:4 – "But I am YaHuWaH your mighty one from the land of Egypt; you shall acknowledge no God but Me, no Savior except Me."

   • New Testament followers claim Jesus is their savior, but YaHuWaH Himself declares that He alone is Savior.

FINAL THOUGHT

By praying to and worshiping Jesus, YeShuA, YaHuShA, YaHuWShuWA, YaHaWaShi, and many others, instead of YaHuWaH alone, New Testament followers violate both their own doctrine (Matthew 6:24) and the God of Israel’s foundational commandments. Instead of serving one Master (YaHuWaH), they serve two or even three (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit). This compromised belief system is not in alignment with the unchanging Torah but rather reflects the pagan-influenced modifications introduced by early Christian church leaders.

Testing the New Testament

It is completely illogical to attempt to prove that the New Testament is true by relying solely on New Testament scriptures. The New Testament itself depends entirely on the Hebrew Bible (TaNaKh) for its foundation. Christianity, as a religion, did not originate independently but rather claims to be an extension or fulfillment of the Hebrew TaNaKh. Therefore, every claim made in the New Testament or about their Messiah must be measured against the original, unchanging source—the Hebrew Bible. This is not a complex or strange concept, but a necessary foundation for understanding truth.

If the New Testament is the only source used to prove the messiahship of this person, then it is engaging in circular reasoning. This would be like someone writing a new book today and declaring themselves a prophet, then using that same book to prove their legitimacy. A claim must be validated by an external, pre-existing authority—in this case, the Hebrew Bible.

For example, if someone says, "Jesus, YeShuA, YaHuShA, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA, etc., fulfilled the prophecies," the logical response is, "Which prophecies? And do they match what the God of Israel actually says in His Torah and, in proper context?" Simply quoting the New Testament saying "he fulfilled the scriptures" proves nothing unless those scriptures are examined in their original Hebrew context.

heretics and liars

According to the God of Israel in His Torah, and even the definition of heresy, the real heresy is any doctrine that opposes His unchanging word (Deuteronomy 12:32, Psalms 119:142, Malachi 3:6). Heresy is a belief that goes against the official teachings or something that has been established as the standard. In this case, the standard is that of the God of Israel, found in His Torah. Those who label us as heretics should reconsider, for rejecting the Torah and following man-made traditions, doctrines, or ideologies that contradict the Torah is the true departure from His truth, which is the Torah. In Psalm 19:7 His truth (the Torah) is deemed perfect (H8549 תָּמִים, tamim), meaning complete, whole, sound, and lacking nothing. Since the Torah is perfect and lacks nothing, there is no need for a New Testament Messiah to fulfill or complete something that is already whole.

We (WOTR) did not write the Hebrew Bible, so regarding us being called liars, the Ninth Commandment forbids false witness (Exodus 20:16). We only share what the Creator already stated. Therefore, those who make these claims are not merely attacking us or calling us liars—they are rejecting the unchanging truth of YaHuWaH and, in doing so, accusing the Creator Himself of falsehood. Their dispute is with the Creator, not with us.

context on our response:

Our stance (WOTR), as followers of the Torah, is rooted in our unwavering trust in the unchanging word of the God of Israel (YaHuWaH) found in the Hebrew Bible. The accusation that WOTR is "liars" stems not from actual deceit but rather from the fact that our perspective is fundamentally different from other individuals, social groups, sects, camps, or religions. This contrast often leads to hostility, name-calling, the creation of slanderous videos, and rumor spreading, particularly when the teachings and commands of the Torah challenge opposing doctrines, ideologies, or cultural norms. Not surprisingly, these accusations come from Christians and many New Testament followers, despite their instruction to show love and compassion. Let us not forget that many of the chosen Hebrew prophets faced significant opposition from the people they were trying to reach, especially when their messages called for repentance and a return to the God of Israel's Torah.

Our Stance Against False Accusations

1. Truth is Defined by the God of Israel, Not Human Opinion

• The Torah is the foundation of all truth, and even New Testament followers agree (Psalms 119:142: "Your righteousness is an everlasting righteousness, and Your Torah is truth.").

• Since WOTR stands by what the Creator has decreed, any disagreement people have with this stance is ultimately a dispute with Him, not us.

• Accusations of lying arise when others refuse to acknowledge that divine truth does not change to accommodate human preferences, hidden agendas, misconceptions, and personal perceptions.

2. The Command Against False Witnesses

• Exodus 20:16 commands: "You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor."

• Those who accuse WOTR of lying simply because our stance aligns with the God of Israel, and contradicts their beliefs are, in fact, guilty of bearing false witness.

• They reject the authority of YaHuWaH’s word and instead impose their own doctrines as the standard of truth.

3. The Unchanging Nature of YaHuWaH’s Word

• Malachi 3:6: "For I am YaHuWaH, I do not change."

• The Torah’s commands remain valid, and adherence to them is not subject to cultural shifts or theological reinterpretation.

• Those who label WOTR as deceptive do so because they follow doctrines that alter or reject YaHuWaH’s unchanging instructions.

• We always encourage people to do their research and compare and contrast the unchanging truth of the God of Israel against everything else. Use various resources to get an overall view of each topic, ensuring that all claims align with the Hebrew Tanakh. By examining historical, linguistic, and cultural Hebrew contexts, individuals can discern the difference between divine truth and human interpretations.

4. Opposition to the Creator’s Words is Not Our Burden

• When WOTR presents YaHuWaH’s truth, those who disagree are not rejecting us but rather rejecting Him (1 Samuel 8:7).

• Many groups, particularly within Western culture, some driven by racial prejudice, have developed interpretations that contradict the Torah, causing them to view the original Hebrew way of life as a threat.

• Their accusations stem from emotional or doctrinal bias rather than factual evidence.

5. Historical and Scholarly Evidence Align with Torah Truth

• The study of history, archaeology, and linguistic origins affirms the Torah’s authenticity.

• Many doctrines that oppose the Torah are based on misinterpretations, cultural additions, or theological alterations over time. For example, Christianity gradually shifted away from Torah observance and exclusive devotion to the God of Israel alone, instead emphasizing the worship of a New Testament Messiah as the path to salvation.

• Accusations against the Torah often ignore the weight of historical, scholarly evidence and the unchanging character of the God of Israel that supports the Torah’s authority.

Conclusion: The Burden of Proof Lies on the Accusers

Those who accuse WOTR of being liars must first prove that the Torah itself is false, as both history and scripture affirm its truth. As previously stated, even New Testament believers recognize the Hebrew Torah as the sacred and unchanging word of the Creator and God of Israel. To claim that the Hebrew Torah is false is to invalidate the New Testament, as the New Testament is entirely dependent on the foundational principles of the Hebrew Bible.

Furthermore, it is irrelevant to use New Testament scriptures to prove the New Testament correct—this is circular reasoning. Since the New Testament claims to fulfill the "Old Testament," it must be tested against the Torah in its proper Hebrew context. Any claim of fulfillment must align with the unchanging words of YaHuWaH; otherwise, it is invalid. Denying the Torah’s authority while attempting to validate the New Testament is not only self-defeating but also implies that the God of Israel is a liar and that His word is not true—an assertion that contradicts both the Hebrew Bible and even the New Testament itself.

The Accusation of Heresy Against WOTR

Those who call us (WOTR) heretics should reconsider that hostile claim because, according to the God of Israel, the Hebrew Bible, and the definition of the word “heretic”, any doctrines that oppose His unchanging commands are heresy.

1. The Biblical Definition of Truth and Heresy

Truth is defined by the Torah, Not Human Interpretation

• Psalms 119:142 – “Your righteousness is an everlasting righteousness, and Your Torah is truth.”

• Malachi 3:6 – “For I, YaHuWaH, do not change.”

• If the Torah is truth, then anything that contradicts it is falsehood.

• If YaHuWaH’s word is unchanging, then any doctrine that alters, replaces, or opposes it is heresy.

The Command Not to Add or Take Away

• Deuteronomy 12:32 – “Whatever I command you, be careful to observe it; you shall not add to it nor take away from it.”

• Any religious system, camp, sect, or individual that adds foreign doctrines or removes parts of the Torah is committing heresy according to the Hebrew Bible itself.

Thus, those who follow the Torah cannot be heretics—only those who oppose it can.

2. The Word “Heretic” and Its Meaning

The Etymology of "Heresy"

The Greek word αἵρεσις (hairesis) in the New Testament, from which “heresy” is derived, means “a sect” or “a division” from the truth. However, in the Hebrew mindset, heresy is best understood as a departure from the Torah.

Definition: Heresy is rejecting or opposing what is established, accepted, and recognized as sound doctrine or truth.

YaHuWaH’s Standard for Heresy

• Deuteronomy 13:1-4 – “If a prophet or a dreamer of dreams arises among you and gives you a sign or a wonder, and the sign or wonder comes to pass concerning which he spoke to you, saying, ‘Let us go after other gods,’ which you have not known, and let us serve them, you shall not listen to the words of that prophet.”

• Any doctrine that leads people away from YaHuWaH’s Torah is the real heresy, not those who uphold it.
  
  
  

3. Accusing WOTR of Heresy is a False Witness Against Torah Keepers

False Accusations Violate the Ninth Commandment

• Exodus 20:16 – “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.”

• Labeling WOTR as “heretics” while defending doctrines that contradict Torah is false witness against those who uphold YaHuWaH’s commands.

Isaiah 5:20: Calling Good Evil and Evil Good

• “Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; who put darkness for light, and light for darkness.”

• Those who follow man-made doctrines while rejecting Torah obedience are guilty of inverting the truth.

If defending the unchanging word of YaHuWaH is considered heresy, then those making the accusation must prove that YaHuWaH’s word has changed, which it has not.

4. The Burden of Proof is on the Accusers

If WOTR is accused of heresy, the accusers must answer:

• Where does the God of Israel say that it will be abolished or replaced?

• Where does the God of Israel approve of altering His commands?

• Where in the Hebrew Bible does it state that the God of Israel’s truth changes with time?

Without twisting scripture, taking topics out of proper Hebrew context, or relying on man-made traditions, their accusation is invalid.

New Testament Followers Who Do Not Live by It

Many who claim to follow the New Testament do not actually live according to its teachings, making them heretics by definition, as they oppose or reject the very doctrine they claim to uphold.

1. Discrediting Deification

• The doctrine of the Incarnation (God becoming flesh) is built on the idea that Jesus, YeShua, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWa, etc., is the Son of God, not born through normal human conception.

• If this messiah had a human father, it would contradict claims of his divine origin and his pre-existence as the Word (John 1:1, 14).

• If this messiah were born through natural means, he would be no different from any other human, disqualifying him from being the "new creation" sent to redeem mankind.

• His ability to perform miracles, save, and resurrect would be questioned, as those powers are attributed to his divine nature.

• If this Messiah had a human father, then the Christian interpretation of Isaiah 7:14 as a prophecy of a virgin birth would be invalidated, casting a crushing blow to the claims of his Messianic identity.

• The belief that this messiah had a biological father would be heretical in traditional New Testament theology.

• Heresy is defined as a deviation from established beliefs, and New Testament theology doctrine has historically condemned any view that denies their messiah’s divine conception.

• This mindset is not new, as ancient groups like the Ebionites, a sect from the 4th century, also rejected the virgin birth and viewed the New Testament Messiah as a purely human figure. The early Church deemed this belief heretical. This is yet another prime example of sects, camps, or groups that alter the Torah to promote their own agendas and beliefs, which contradict the unchanging Torah of the God of Israel. King Solomon, in his wisdom, speaks of this in Ecclesiastes 1:9. He emphasizes that human experiences, events, and patterns repeat over time.

• If their messiah had a biological father, it would discredit his divine nature, invalidate key New Testament doctrines, and challenge the entire foundation of New Testament followers. This belief would not only contradict the Gospels but also be classified as heretical under traditional New Testament teachings.

• If their messiah had a biological father, it would explain the prophecy linking him to the bloodline of David and a Hebrew tribe, since lineage in Hebrew tradition is determined through the father (see Numbers 1:18, 36:7-9, 2 Samuel 7:12-13 and Exodus 28:1). However, this concept still collapses, as he would remain a normal human, lacking the divine nature attributed to him in Christian theology.

• According to the Christian doctrine of being “born into sin”, if this messiah had a human father, he would inherit the sinful nature (Romans 5:12), contradicting the belief that he is the pure and perfect sacrifice for humanity’s sins and implying that he himself would also need a savior.

• Without divine origin, this New Testament messiah’s death would be seen as just another martyrdom, rather than a cosmic act of redemption.
  

2. The New Testament Itself Condemns Lawlessness

• Matthew 5:17-19 – “Do not think that I came to destroy the Torah or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill… Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven.”

  • Many New Testament believers claim the Torah is "done away with," yet this directly contradicts what their own book says.

• 1 John 3:4 – “Whoever commits sin also transgresses the Torah, for sin is the transgression of the Torah.”

  • If sin is breaking the Torah, then those who reject Torah yet claim to follow the New Testament are living in opposition to their own doctrine.
    

3. Many Ignore the New Testament’s Own Instructions on Works and Obedience

• James 2:17-20 – “Faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead… Even the demons believe—and tremble!”

  • Many claim "faith alone" is enough, yet this contradicts the New Testament’s own teaching that faith must be accompanied by action.

• Romans 3:31 – “Do we then make void the Torah through faith? Certainly not! On the contrary, we establish the Torah.”

  • Paul, whom many Christians misinterpret, clearly states that faith does not nullify the Torah but upholds it.
    
    

4. New Testament Christians Do Not Follow Its Lifestyle Teachings

• 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 – “Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.”

  • Yet many New Testament believers engage in, tolerate, or justify these behaviors, proving they do not live by the book they claim to follow.

• 1 Peter 1:16 – “Be holy, for I am holy.”

  • Holiness in the New Testament is still rooted in the Torah’s definition of clean and unclean, yet many reject those laws.
    
    

Conclusion: WHO Are the True Heretics

By New Testament standards, anyone who:

• Rejects or breaks the unchanging Torah (Matthew 7:3, 5:17-19, James 2:17, 1 John 2:9-11, 3:4, Romans 3:20, 7:7, Hebrews 10:26-28)

• Teaches lawlessness (Romans 3:31)

• Lives contrary to biblical morality (1 Corinthians 6:9-10)

Is in opposition to the book they claim to follow, making them the true heretics.

Those who falsely call us heretics should examine their own beliefs and practices, because by Torah definition, opposing YaHuWaH’s commands is the real heresy.

According to the New Testament:

• Sin = transgression of Torah (Law) (1 John 3:4)

• The Torah gives us the knowledge of sin (Romans 7:7; 3:20)

• Breaking commandments = sin (James 2:9-11)

• Lawlessness (Torah-breaking) is condemned by the Messiah Himself (Matthew 7:23)

QUESTION: I've come across many different versions of the God of Israel—YHWH, also known by the Greek term 'Tetragrammaton.' Some say it’s YaHWeH, or YaHuaH, others say YaHoWaH, and many Black Hebrew Israelites insist it’s YaHaWaH, claiming you add an 'A' after every consonant. But they can’t all be right. And if no one today speaks or has heard the original ancient Hebrew, how can we know which pronunciation is correct?

ANSWER: That's a great question, and you're absolutely right—it's clear that not all of them can be correct. This topic has been debated for centuries, but thanks to advances in technology and easy access to information, we can now make informed decisions based on facts, evidence, and research, rather than relying on the traditions or widely accepted views that have been passed down over time. Research tells us that the Hebrew language, like other Semitic languages, has its origins in the broader Semitic language family, which is part of the Afro-Asiatic language phylum. The origins of Hebrew can be traced back to the Proto-Semitic language, spoken by ancient peoples in the Near East around 4,000 to 5,000 years ago. Over time, as groups of Semitic speakers spread across different regions, the language began to diversify into various branches, including Northwest Semitic, which includes Canaanite languages like Hebrew, Phoenician, and others.

The Canaanite languages were spoken in the region of ancient Canaan, which roughly corresponds to modern-day Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, and parts of Syria and Jordan. The Hebrew language specifically evolved from the Canaanite languages, making it a Canaanite language rather than a separate branch entirely. The ancient Hebrews (or Israelites) likely adopted the Canaanite language and adapted it for their own purposes. The development of Hebrew into a distinct language was influenced by both the Canaanite environment and the unique cultural identity of the Hebrew people.

Some key points about the origins of Hebrew:

1. Canaanite Roots: Hebrew shares many similarities with other Canaanite languages (like Phoenician, Moabite, and Ammonite), all of which evolved from a common Proto-Semitic language.

2. Hebrew's Early Development: The earliest known examples of Hebrew writing are found in inscriptions dating to around the 10th century BCE, though oral traditions and linguistic development likely existed much earlier.

3. Cultural and Religious Influence: As the Israelites developed their unique identity, Hebrew became the language of the Torah, their lifestyle guidelines, and the laws that defined them as a people. This helped to solidify Hebrew as the primary language of the Israelites.

4. Proto-Semitic to Hebrew: Over centuries, the language underwent changes, including shifts in phonetics, vocabulary, and grammar, leading to the form of Hebrew that we recognize in ancient texts like the Hebrew Bible (TaNaKh).

In summary, the Hebrews inherited their language from the Canaanite branch of the Northwest Semitic languages, and their unique cultural and lifetsyle developments contributed to the further evolution of Hebrew.

• Proto-Semitic → Canaanite languages (including Hebrew and Phoenician).

• Hebrew and Phoenician evolved independently from the common Canaanite linguistic ancestor, but both are part of the larger Semitic language family.

• The Hebrews spoke a Canaanite language (Hebrew).

• The Phoenicians also spoke a Canaanite language (Phoenician).

• Both Hebrew and Phoenician share a common Canaanite ancestor, which itself evolved from the Proto-Semitic language.

What are abjads

All three of these languages — Hebrew, Phoenician, and Canaanite — are considered abjads. An abjad is a type of writing system in which the primary characters represent consonants, and vowels are typically not written.

Here's how each of these languages fits into the abjad category:

1. Phoenician: The Phoenician script is one of the earliest known examples of an abjad. It primarily represents consonants, and vowels were implied from the context rather than explicitly written. Phoenician is considered the precursor to many alphabetic writing systems, including Greek and Latin.

2. Hebrew: The ancient Hebrew script (used in the Hebrew Bible and early inscriptions) also primarily represents consonants. In ancient Hebrew, vowels were generally not written, though certain vowel sounds could be inferred from the surrounding consonants. Later, a system of vowel points (known as nikud) was developed to clarify pronunciation, especially in religious texts and education.

3. Canaanite: The Canaanite languages, including ancient Hebrew and Phoenician, used an abjad-like writing system in which consonants were written, and vowels were either inferred or represented with occasional marks in some cases. The Canaanite script evolved into the Phoenician script, which influenced the development of other alphabetic writing systems. However, linguists and scholars over time have been able to reconstruct the likely vowel sounds based on comparative historical linguistics, modern technology, and related Semitic languages such as Hebrew, Ugaritic, and later Aramaic and Arabic.
   
   

WHAT DOES THE RESEARCH AND EVIDENCE TELL US

Although these Proto-Semitic languages did not include written vowels, modern scholars can reconstruct their pronunciation by comparing related Semitic languages and increasingly utilizing technological tools such as phonological modeling, linguistic databases, and AI. This multidisciplinary approach has helped reconstruct likely vowel patterns with a high degree of confidence, even in ancient names like YHWH.

✅ Historical Evidence Confirms YHWH Has Four Consonants (Tetragrammaton):

1. The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh):

• The name of the God of Israel is consistently written as יהוה (Yod-He-Waw-He)—YHWH.

• It appears over 6,800 times in the entire Hebrew TaNaKh.

• This is not a disputed fact among Hebrew and Christian scholars—YHWH is four consonants.
  
  

📜 2. The Mesha Stele (Moabite Stone)

• Date: c. 840 BCE

• Language: Moabite (closely related to Hebrew)

• Location Found: Dhiban, Jordan

• Significance:

  • This is one of the earliest non-Hebrew references to YHWH.

  • King Mesha of Moab boasts of defeating Israel and taking items from the "house of YHWH" (Hebrew: בֵּית יְהוָה).

  • Confirms that Israel worshipped YHWH and had a temple or sanctuary in His name.

📜 Direct quote from the Moabite Stone (line 18):

“And I took from there the vessels of YHWH (יהוה), and I dragged them before Chemosh…”

📖 Reference: Lemaire, A., “La Stèle de Mésha et la Bible,” Revue Biblique (1994).

3.🧾 The Kuntillet Ajrud Inscriptions

• Date: c. 800 BCE

• Location: Sinai Peninsula

• Language: Hebrew with Phoenician influence

• Content:

  • Several inscriptions mention YHWH of Samaria and YHWH of Teman.

  • One inscription reads: “Blessed be X by YHWH of Samaria and his Asherah.”

  • Shows regional worship of YHWH and affirms His name as a central deity of the northern kingdom of Israel.

📖 Reference: Meshel, Z. Kuntillet 'Ajrud (Horvat Teman): An Iron Age II Religious Site on the Judah-Sinai Border (2012, Israel Exploration Society)

4.🏺 The Lachish Letters

• Date: Just before the Babylonian conquest of Judah (~586 BCE)

• Language: Paleo-Hebrew

• Location: Lachish (southern Judah)

• Content:

  • These are military correspondences mentioning YHWH by name.

  • One letter asks for protection from YHWH, showing He was still actively worshipped and invoked by name just before Judah fell.

📖 Reference: Torczyner, H., The Lachish Letters (1938)

5.⚱️ The Elephantine Papyri (Egypt)

• Date: 5th century BCE

• Location: Elephantine Island, Egypt

• Language: Aramaic

• Content:

  • Jewish soldiers in Egypt wrote to Jerusalem asking for help rebuilding a temple to YHWH.

  • Shows YHWH’s worship was known even outside of Israel, and His name was used explicitly.

    📖 Reference: Porten, B. Archives from Elephantine: The Life of an Ancient Jewish Military Colony (1968)
    

🧠 Summary:

Historical, archaeological, and textual evidence consistently confirms that the name of the God of Israel is written with four Hebrew consonants—YHWH (יהוה). This is supported not only in the Hebrew Bible but also in other ancient non-Israelite inscriptions like the Moabite Stone.

What is the most linguistically sound pronunciation of YHWH?

While “YaHuWaH” is still a minority scholarly position, modern linguistic, historical, and textual evidence shows that it is strongly grounded in:

✅ 1. Theophoric Names (Names Containing YHWH)

• Names like NetanYaHuW, YarmiYaHuW, and Yesha‘YaHuW consistently preserve the "YaHu" component.

• Scholars like Frank Moore Cross and Wilhelm Gesenius affirm that “YaHu” is an ancient, valid short form of the divine name.

• This directly supports the first part of the name: YaHu.
  
  
  

✅ 2. Semitic & Phoenician Grammar Compatibility

• Scholars such as Edward Lipiński and John Huehnergard show that vowel patterns like a-u-a (as in Ya-Hu-WaH) fit common Semitic verb and noun structures.

• “YaHuWaH” aligns well with Semitic morphology for third-person imperfect verb forms, meaning “He exists” or “He causes to be.”

• Phoenician, being consonantal, had a limited vowel range (/a/, /u/, /i/), and “YaHuWaH” uses only native vowels, making it entirely compatible with Phoenician phonology.
  
  
  

❌ 3. Problems with "YaHaWaH"

• The version "YaHaWaH" often promoted by some Black Hebrew Israelite groups has no grammatical basis in classical Hebrew.

• It stems from a folk tradition of simply adding an “A” vowel after every consonant (e.g., Y = Ya, H = Ha, W = Wa, H = Ha).

• No scholarly Hebrew grammar—ancient or modern—supports this method.

• It lacks historical, epigraphic, and linguistic validation.

• The rule of adding an A after each consonant has no basis in historical linguistics, no support among scholars, and is not part of any historical Semitic language, including Biblical Hebrew, Phoenician, Ugaritic, or Aramaic. While YaHaWaH as a form is not entirely impossible, the method used by some to arrive at it—using a universal a vowel after every consonant—is not a credible linguistic approach.

• In fact, no ancient Hebrew personal names contain vocalized vowels that spell “YaHaW.” For example, names like NethanYaHuW (נְתַנְיָהוּ), YarmiYaHuW (ירמיהוּ), and Yesha‘YaHuW (ישׁעיהוּ) all in the long form end with the YHW (YaHuW); they never appear as NethanYaHaW, or YirmeYaHaW, or Yesha‘YaHaW.

⚠️ 4. Limitations of "Yahweh" (the scholarly mainstream view)

• "YaHWeH" became popular through 19th–20th century biblical scholarship.

• While it does partially reflect Semitic roots (Y-H-W-H), it:

  • ❌ Does not match the “YaHu” form seen in theophoric names.

  • ⚠️ Only partially fits Semitic morphology.

  • ❌ Uses an “e” vowel that is not common or natural to Phoenician or early Hebrew usage.

  • While "YaHWeH" remains dominant in scholarship due to tradition and some textual support, "YaHuWaH" has strong linguistic and historical backing when viewed from the lens of Semitic phonology, Phoenician grammar, and theophoric name evidence. It uses only authentic vowels (/a/, /u/) and preserves the triconsonantal root logic of Semitic languages.

  • “YaHWeH” is a modern scholarly reconstruction, not a preserved or historically recorded pronunciation. In fact, no ancient Hebrew texts or personal names contain vocalized vowels that spell “YaHWe.” For example, names like NethanYaHuW (נְתַנְיָהוּ), YirmeYaHuW (ירמיהוּ), and Yesha‘YaHuW (ישׁעיהוּ) all in the long form end with the YHW (YaHuW); they never appear as NethanYaHWe, YirmeYaHWe, or Yesha‘YaHWe.
    
    
    

❌ 5. “YaHuaH” Drops a Consonant

• “YaHuaH” only vocalizes three consonants:

  • Ya = י

  • Hu = הו (He + Waw)

  • ah = ה

• The name of the God of Israel is established as having four consonants. YaHuaH, skips or compresses the Waw (ו) as a separate consonant, effectively treating the Waw and second He as one unit or weakening the consonantal structure.

• It doesn’t honor all four consonants, which undermines the integrity of the original name structure.

• If you change the spelling, you change the meaning
  
  
  

❌6. YeHoWaH

Background:

• "YeHoWaH" is where the English name “Jehovah” originated.

• This form emerged during the Middle Ages, when Masoretic scribes inserted vowel points from Adonai (אֲדֹנָי) into the consonants YHWH to remind readers not to pronounce the name, but say “Adonai” instead.

Problems:

• It’s artificial, not a real pronunciation.

• The e-o-a vowels don’t reflect any natural Semitic morphology.

• Most scholars agree it's a later hybrid for devotional avoidance, not a true phonetic form.

• In fact, no ancient Hebrew personal names contain vocalized vowels that spell “YeHoW.” For example, names like NethanYaHuW (נְתַנְיָהוּ), YirmeYaHuW (ירמיהוּ), and Yesha‘YaHuW (ישׁעיהוּ) all in the long form end with the YHW (YaHuW); they never appear as NethanYeHoW, YirmeYeHoW, or Yesha‘YeHoW.
  
  
  

❌7. YaHoWaH

Background:

• YaHoWaH appears in some Karaite, Samaritan, and later mystical Jewish traditions.

• It attempts to keep all four consonants of YHWH with inserted vowels.

Strengths:

• Unlike “YeHoWaH,” it may reflect a more intentional vocalization.

• It preserves the Waw as a consonant.

Weaknesses:

• The “Ho” syllable is not attested in any theophoric names. We see “YaHu”, not “YaHo”.

• Theophoric names like YirmeYaHu and NetanYaHu show “YaHu”, not “Yeho” or “Yaho” at the end or beginning.

• “Ho” is not a natural vowel sequence in Semitic for divine or verbal roots related to “to be.”

• In fact, no ancient Hebrew personal names contain vocalized vowels that spell “YaHoW.” For example, names like NethanYaHuW (נְתַנְיָהוּ), YirmeYaHuW (ירמיהוּ), and Yesha‘YaHuW (ישׁעיהוּ) all in the long form end with the YHW (YaHuW); they never appear as NethanYaHoW, YirmeYaHoW, or Yesha‘YaHoW.

❌8. Jehovah

1. Historical Fact: The Letter J Is the Newest Letter in the English Alphabet

• The letter J was the last consonant added to the English alphabet.

• It did not exist in the classical Latin alphabet and wasn’t distinguished from the letter I until around the 16th century.

• The modern “J” sound (as in "Jesus" or "Jehovah") — the soft "g" or "zh" sound — developed much later, in post-medieval European languages, especially in French and later English.

📘 Timeline Snapshot:

2. "Jehovah" Contains Sounds Not Found in Ancient Hebrew

• There is no consonant “J” or its sound in Hebrew — or in any ancient Semitic language. The Hebrew letter Yod (י) always produces a “Y” sound, never “J.”

• Similarly, the “V” sound is a later European development. The preceding ancient Hebrew letter Waw (ו) was pronounced like “W”, not “V.”

• Therefore, the name "JeHoVaH" contains two foreign phonemes — “J” and “V” — that did not exist in Biblical Hebrew or Phoenician.

3. "Jehovah" Is Based on a Known Hybrid Mistake

• The form “JeHoVaH” originated in the Middle Ages, when Christian scholars inserted the vowels of “Adonai” (אֲדֹנָי) into the consonants of YHWH (יהוה), producing “YeHoVaH.”

• This was not intended to represent the true pronunciation — it was meant so that readers would say “Adonai” instead of the sacred name. Nowhere in the Hebrew Bible does the God of Israel command His chosen people to cease speaking, sharing, or esteeming His Name. To the contrary, suppressing or concealing His Name would contradict His very nature and character, as the Hebrew Scriptures emphasize that the God of Israel is jealous and He will never give His glory to another for the mighty works He performs (Isaiah 42:8).

• Over time, this misunderstood cue was mistakenly read aloud as if it were the real name, eventually becoming “JeHoVaH” in European languages.

4. Even Jehovah’s Witnesses Acknowledge It’s Not the Original Pronunciation

• On the official JeHoVaH’s Witness website, the New World Bible Translation Committee admits that:

  “The form 'JeHoVaH' is not exactly the way the divine name would have been pronounced in ancient Hebrew.”

• They say the reason they use JeHoVaH is because of its long history in the English language, not because it’s accurate to the original tongue.

• However, the TaNaKh (Hebrew Bible) is written in Hebrew, not English, and English historical usage has no authority over the pronunciation of ancient Semitic words.

• Using English tradition to determine the divine name ignores the Canaanite linguistic roots of the Hebrew people and their scriptures.

5. "Jehovah" Violates Known Patterns in Hebrew Theophoric Names

• Hebrew names that include the divine element YHW (יהו) consistently preserve the “Yahu” or “Yahoo” sound, such as:

  • YeshaYaH (Isaiah)

  • YirmeYaH (Jeremiah)

  • NetanYaH (Netanyahu)

• The form “JeHoVaH” never appears in any theophoric Hebrew names, nor does it follow known vowel patterns found in related Semitic names and inscriptions.

• In fact, no ancient Hebrew personal names contain vocalized vowels that spell “JaHoV.” For example, names like NethanYaHuW (נְתַנְיָהוּ), YirmeYaHuW (ירמיהוּ), and Yesha‘YaHuW (ישׁעיהוּ) all in the long form end with the YHW (YaHuW); they never appear as NethanJaHoV, YirmeJaHoV, or Yesha‘JaHoV.

✅ Summary Table: Why “Jehovah” Doesn’t Fit Ancient Hebrew

Summary Table:

YaHuWaH is one of the best candidates for the original pronunciation of the divine name when judged by Semitic grammar, Phoenician/Canaanite phonology, and historical evidence. It's both linguistically and historically viable, especially when prioritizing native Semitic patterns over later traditions.

'tomato' or 'tomahto'?

QUESTION: Why make a big deal about how the God of Israel's name is pronounced, 'tomato' / 'tomahto'? It’s the same thing either way.

ANSWER: This is a deep and thoughtful question. However, regarding the Creator’s name, this idiom doesn't hold when it comes to something as sacred and linguistically precise as the Name of the God of Israel (YaHuWaH). Let's break it down with some clarity and respect for both language and scripture:

🌍 1. Tomato / TomAHto = Phonetic but Not Semantic

This idiom only works in contexts where the meaning stays the same, even if the pronunciation shifts:

• "Tomato" (American) vs "Tomah-to" (British) = Same word, same object, no change in meaning.

• It’s about regional accent, not substance.

This works because "tomato" isn’t a sacred or semantically loaded word. There's no deeper theological, covenantal, or prophetic significance attached to it.

🔡 2. YHWH: A Name with Divine Meaning and Linguistic Intent

When it comes to the Name of the Most High (YHWH), we’re not just dealing with sound — we’re dealing with:

• Etymology (root words like ha’yah – “to be, to exist”),

• Covenantal identity (Exodus 3:14, “I AM that I AM”),

• Sacred phonetics that carry meaning and authority,

• And a direct link to how the Name is spelled in Hebrew (יהוה).

🔠 3. Why “YaHuWaH” ≠ “YaHuaH” — Even If They Sound Similar

Even if “YaHuWaH” and “YaHuaH” sound similar to the untrained ear, they are not the same when we analyze:

• Syllable structure

• Hebrew root meanings

• Linguistic consistency with other Hebrew names that preserve the divine name element (like YashaYaHuW, NatanYaHuW, AliYaHuW).

🔎 “YaHuWaH”:

• Breaks down more cleanly as:

  • YaHu = He is

  • WaH = existing/breathing/being

• It is consistent with ancient theophoric names that preserve the Yahu element (which scholars agree was the common short form of YHWH in names).

🆚 “YaHuaH”:

• Drops the "W" (ו, waw) in pronunciation, altering not just sound but meaning.

• It could be read by Hebrew scholars as implying a different structure or root, possibly confusing it with forms like “Yahuwah” (misused in Arabic or syncretized forms).

• It risks detaching from the original triliteral root (היה – Ha (prefix)’ YaH, “to be”) that defines the essence of YHWH’s self-declaration.

  ✨ PREFIX EXAMPLES:

  • ה (Ha-) is attached directly to a noun to make it definite (just like "the" in English).

  • Example:

    • ספר (SePeR) = book

    • הספר (Ha’SePeR) = the book

      🌟 The Term: Ha’Sham (השם)

      • Ha (ה) = "the" (definite article)

      • Shem (שם) = "name"

      So Ha’Sham literally means “The Name.”

❌ Why “Tomato/TomAHto” Doesn’t Work Here:

Because, unlike a fruit:

• A slight shift in pronunciation or spelling of the divine Name alters meaning, identity, and covenantal understanding.

• It’s not about accent or regional preference — it’s about truth, precision, and reverence for the Name that appears nearly 7,000 times in the Hebrew TaNaKh.

• Substituting or altering the divine Name without care leads to confusion, syncretism, or even doctrinal error.

✅ Conclusion:

In this case, saying “YaHuWaH vs. YaHuaH” is not like “tomato vs. tomahto” — it’s more like "truth vs. near-truth", or "covenant name vs. corrupted variation" when examined more closely. The sacredness, precision, and linguistic consistency of the Name demand more than casual pronunciation.

For a more in-depth exploration of the topic of the God of Israel’s name and its relevance in Western culture, consider becoming a WOTR member. Membership offers exclusive access to full-length videos, over 250 pages of content, scholarly resources, and downloadable study guides for both adults and children, providing valuable tools to enhance your learning journey.

QUESTION: After reading the words of the God of Israel in the Hebrew Torah concerning exclusive devotion to Him alone, I made the difficult yet necessary decision to separate myself from Western holidays that are undeniably rooted in pagan worship. As a result of this conviction, many of my family members and friends have chosen to distance themselves from me. I would sincerely appreciate any wisdom or guidance from others who have walked a similar path.

ANSWER: First and foremost, we completely understand your position—we’ve walked the same path and faced similar rejection. It’s incredibly painful to be cast aside by those who once claimed to love you and stand by you no matter what. But when you choose to stand for truth, for undeniable facts, and—above all—for the unchanging commands of the Creator of all things, the God of Israel, opposition and isolation often become part of the journey.

After 15 years of engaging in dialogue with Christians and New Testament believers, one key insight has become increasingly clear: these individuals are often far more aware than they appear. Many fully recognize that the holidays they celebrate have undeniable roots in pagan traditions and are neither commanded nor mentioned in the very book they claim as their spiritual authority. In today’s digital age, where information is more accessible than ever, the evidence is overwhelming—and while few will admit it openly, many are quietly grappling with the growing tension between their practices and their professed beliefs. The discomfort is real, and awareness is growing. Yet, many continue in these traditions—often justifying their choice with reasons like family custom, doing it “for the children,” or claiming that pagan origins aren't their intent. Whether driven by emotion, pressure, or habit, it doesn’t make your choice wrong—it makes your choice courageous. This doesn’t make your choice wrong; it makes your choice brave.

This is something the Hebrew Scriptures and even history among the ancient Israelites prepare us for—obedience often sets people apart. Still, this is not a time for bitterness. Continue to show them love. If their love for you is sincere, they will eventually be moved to ask questions and seek to understand why you’ve made such a significant and transformative decision after all these years. When that moment comes, it opens the door to share not only the facts and evidence but, most importantly, what the God of Israel says about participating in practices rooted in idolatry.

Open and honest dialogue is healthy and beneficial for everyone involved. It creates opportunities to exchange perspectives, ask meaningful questions, and present factual evidence where necessary. Having differing views doesn't mean that family bonds must be broken. There are 365 days in a year—choosing to refrain from participating in a few specific holidays rooted in traditions you no longer align with doesn't mean you’ve rejected every opportunity for connection. You can still visit, share meals, and enjoy fellowship throughout the year.

Unfortunately, assumptions often lead people to draw extreme conclusions, believing that your choice to step away from a handful of celebrations equates to cutting off the relationship entirely. That’s simply not true. What’s often happening beneath the surface is that they sense something isn’t right about these traditions but aren’t ready to confront it. Rather than engaging in a respectful and honest conversation to maintain the relationship, it’s easier for them to shut you out than confront the discomfort of potential change.

One question that has always deeply challenged us—and often leaves others speechless—is this: If we're taught in church to cultivate a genuine and loyal relationship with the Creator, and we take it upon ourselves to seek out what that truly means by turning to the Hebrew Torah (which Christian scholars themselves affirm as the sacred, inspired, and unchanging Word of God), why is it that choosing to follow its clear instruction becomes controversial? Time and again, the Torah emphasizes that the foundation of this relationship is to worship and serve the God of Israel alone, no substitutes, no mediators—as explicitly stated.

Exodus 20:3. “You shall have no other gods before me.”

I believe there's a profound reason why Exodus 20:3 is the very first commandment. It sets the foundation for an exclusive and undivided relationship with the God of Israel. All relationships, whether romantic, familial, or spiritual, thrive on clear guidelines and mutual respect. Without them, loyalty becomes impossible to define. In the natural sense, if two people are dating and the terms are not explicitly stated that either party is free to see others, there should be no surprise when one person betrays the trust. However, once individuals choose to become intimate, that decision inherently requires loyalty to each other, not to others. Loyalty is not a passive aspect of a relationship—it’s an active commitment to one another's well-being, trust, and exclusivity. This is no different from the guidelines set forth in the relationship between YaHuWaH and the nation of Israel. Due to the distortions, removals, and additions to the Torah, the New Testament believers violate this commandment daily, often without realizing it, thereby living in direct disobedience to the Creator’s instruction.

The idea that a New Testament messiah now sits at the right hand of the Creator, acting as a mediator to make people appear righteous, fundamentally undermines the weight and authority of this command. It introduces a figure alongside or between humanity and the God of Israel—something the first commandment explicitly forbids. When measured against the Torah, this concept does not hold up; instead, it creates a contradiction that cannot be reconciled with the very words of the God who declares His oneness and demands exclusive worship.

So, when someone chooses to honor that command by removing any intermediaries and devoting themselves fully to the God of Israel, why is that seen as offensive or radical? The most common response to this question is silence—because, in truth, there’s nothing inherently wrong with choosing loyalty to One.

Perhaps the discomfort stems from the fact that, in today’s Western culture, unwavering loyalty—especially in spiritual matters and rejecting holiday celebrations rooted in idol worship—is uncommon and unpopular. The culture celebrates compromise and emotional convenience over truth and obedience. So yes, choosing loyalty to the God of Israel in a time where spiritual loyalty is unpopular can cause discomfort for others—it confronts the hypocrisy many feel but are not ready to address.

However, from a relational standpoint, adding a third party into what is meant to be a direct and intimate connection with the Creator fundamentally alters the dynamic. Last I checked, inserting a mediator into a relationship turns a personal covenant into something less personal, less faithful, and less aligned with the original design. Just as in a marriage, loyalty to one means forsaking all others. That’s what you’re choosing. That’s what you’re defending. And in doing so, you're not walking away from love—you’re walking toward it. Toward the purest form of love: devotion to the One who created you.

📖 Malachi 3:16

"Then they that feared YaHuWaH spake often one to another: and YaHuWaH hearkened, and heard it, and a book of remembrance was written before him for them that feared YaHuWaH, and that thought upon his name."

🔍 What Is the Book of Remembrance?

This "book of remembrance" symbolizes divine recognition and recording of the faithful actions, words, and attitudes of those who truly honor and revere the Name of YaHuWaH.

It’s a deeply Hebrew concept—that the Creator doesn’t just observe but remembers those who are loyal, obedient, and who speak often of Him and His Name. In Hebrew thought, to “remember” is not just mental recollection—it means to act on behalf of, to honor, to preserve.

🕯️ Why It Matters: living in Western culture

This verse:

• Contrasts the obedient with the wicked, especially in a time when many had grown cold, corrupt, or indifferent.

• Reinforces the importance of speaking about YaHuWaH, thinking on His Name, and fearing Him (i.e., showing reverence and obedience).

• Serves as a comfort and encouragement to those who are rejected or isolated for staying loyal—YaHuWaH sees, hears, and writes it down.

🔹 1. YaHuWaH Sees and Records Faithful Obedience

Malachi 3:16 reminds us that YaHuWaH listens and writes down the words and actions of those who fear Him and think on His Name.

In today’s Western culture, where standing against mainstream holidays rooted in idolatry often results in rejection or alienation, this verse affirms that your loyalty isn’t overlooked—it’s remembered by the Creator Himself. You may lose relationships with people, but you gain honor in the eyes of the Most High.

🔹 2. It Validates the Importance of His Name and Torah

The verse praises those who “thought upon His Name.” This isn't just about saying His Name—it's about honoring everything that His Name represents: His commandments, His character, what His opinion is, and His covenant with Israel.

Rejecting a mediator (which violates the first commandment in Exodus 20:3) and clinging to YaHuWaH alone is part of this honor. You are demonstrating that He alone is your mighty one, just as the Torah declares.

🔹 3. Encouragement in the Face of Isolation

For those who have lost friends or family for choosing to obey Torah over tradition, this verse is like a direct hug from YaHuWaH:

“You are not forgotten. I see your faithfulness. I hear your words. I am recording your loyalty.”

The Book of Remembrance is not written for the masses—it’s for the few who choose truth over popularity, obedience over convenience, and YaHuWaH over compromise.

🔹 4. A Foreshadowing of Future Reward

Just a few verses later, Malachi 3:17 says:

“And they shall be mine, saith YaHuWaH of hosts, in that day when I make up my jewels…”

Your obedience now, especially in the face of cultural pressure, is like storing up treasure. You are being set apart as one of His jewels, His special possession, Israel. This is deeply tied to the promises given to Israel for covenant loyalty (see Deut. 7:6, Exod. 19:5).

💡 Summary

Malachi 3:16 gives strength to those who:

• Refuse to partake in pagan holidays

• Reject the practice of worshiping the God of Israel through a mediator

• Boldly stand for Torah in a culture of compromise

It is a divine reminder that you are seen, heard, remembered, and treasured by the God of Israel—YaHuWaH.

QUESTION: I often see New Testament believers share the popular saying, “Everyone wants YaHuWaH’s blessing but not the obedience to His Word.” But isn’t that a contradiction? The God of Israel clearly commands His people to worship Him alone, with no intermediaries. What are your thoughts on this? And more importantly, what does the Torah actually say about obedience and worship?

ANSWER: Social media platforms are powerful spaces where users can create, share content, engage with others, and build online communities. However, it's important to exercise caution when posting, as history shows that many users often share emotionally charged quotes or information without verifying their accuracy. This can lead to the rapid spread of misinformation, half-truths, and even blasphemous claims, misleading others and distorting truth. The popular saying among New Testament believers—“Everyone wants YaHuWaH’s blessing but not the obedience to His Word”—may at first sound like a call to deeper commitment, but it is deeply hypocritical when examined through the lens of the unchanging Hebrew Torah and the identity of the God of Israel, YaHuWaH.

After more than 14 years of doing this work, we’ve come to understand that many who begin to see the hypocrisy within Christianity—and who start to recognize that its foundations are actually rooted in the unchanging principles of the Hebrew Torah—still often fall short of grasping the full truth, largely because they haven’t fully detoxed from the influence of Christianity. They often stop at surface-level changes, thinking it's enough to replace the name “LORD” with YaHuWaH, or swap “Jesus” for names like Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, or YaHuWShuWA. Yet they continue following the doctrines and mindset of the New Testament, rather than returning fully to the eternal Torah of YaHuWaH.

Other common traits include continuing to attend church services while internally substituting phrases, such as responding with “YaHuWaH” (or other variants) in their minds when the congregation says “Praise the Lord.” Without taking a much-needed detox from years of Christian indoctrination, many still promote and engage with Christian praise and worship songs, simply replacing the English or Latinized names with YaHuWaH or YaHuWShuWA (or similar forms), rather than reevaluating any Torah foundation of those practices.

Without being challenged or stretched beyond their comfort zones, most people naturally remain the same, especially when they’re surrounded by others who think, live, and believe just like they do. Growth rarely happens in echo chambers; it’s sparked by the courage to confront what’s familiar and question what’s always been assumed.

The truth is, one must be willing to completely reevaluate everything they’ve been taught—not just about the so-called "Old Testament," but especially about the New Testament and its claim to be the continuation of the Hebrew Torah. This process requires a willingness to research unfamiliar topics and be humbled by the realization that much of what they've believed was based on replacement theology—the false idea that the Torah was set aside.

Christianity and New Testament belief systems often condition people emotionally, discouraging critical thought, and what the God of Israel actually commanded, detaching them from the foundational truth of the Hebrew Torah. However, if Christians and New Testament believers truly acknowledge that the Hebrew Torah contains the eternal and unchanging commandments of the Creator, then they must also be willing to reexamine everything—especially the New Testament—in light of that truth. While many New Testament followers claim that the God of Israel is perfect and unchanging, they still follow teachings that directly contradict His Word. If the ultimate goal is obedience to YaHuWaH, then that obedience must be rooted in His Torah, not in a belief system that teaches contrary doctrines.

We’ve said it many times—everyone has opinions, and diverse perspectives can be valuable. They spark important discussions and open the door to challenging conversations. And when all parties are genuinely seeking truth, these moments often lead to deep research and fact-finding, pushing individuals to audit their beliefs against solid evidence.

No matter the topic, most would agree that facts, evidence, and unchanging truth are the only reliable ways to verify what’s being discussed. When it comes to the Torah and the New Testament, this principle is even more critical. The only true authority for validating any scriptural claim is the One who authored it—the God of Israel, the mighty one of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob—YaHuWaH. That being said, you’re absolutely right—what truly matters is the Creator’s perspective. What does His Torah actually say about obedience and worship? Let’s break this down:

1. The Hypocrisy of the Statement

This statement condemns people for wanting blessings without obedience—yet those who say it often fail to obey the very Word of YaHuWaH (His Torah), while simultaneously elevating a New Testament Messiah (Jesus/Yahusha, etc.) as divine or as an intermediary. This is a clear contradiction of the Torah, which is the true and eternal Word of YaHuWaH.

2. Torah: The Eternal, Unchanging Word of YaHuWaH

• Malachi 3:6 – “For I am YaHuWaH, I do not change.”

• Deuteronomy 4:2 – “You shall not add to the word which I command you, nor take from it…”

• Isaiah 42:8 – “I am YaHuWaH, that is My name; and My glory I will not give to another, nor My praise to carved images.”

The Torah clearly teaches that:

• YaHuWaH is One (Deuteronomy 6:4).

• He does not share His authority, esteem, or worship with anyone—not even with a Messiah, angel, or human.

• Worship and obedience are to be directed to Him alone, without any intermediaries (Exodus 20:3–5).
  
  

3. The New Testament Contradiction: Worship Through a Mediator

• New Testament doctrine teaches that their Messiah (Jesus/Yahusha. etc.) is:

  • The “Word made flesh” (John 1:14),

  • The “Son of God” and often equated with God Himself (John 10:30),

  • The object of worship and prayer (Philippians 2:10, Romans 10:9),

  • The intermediary between God and man (1 Timothy 2:5).

This introduces Greek and Roman theological influence:

• The Greco-Roman world was deeply polytheistic, often employing intermediaries (like demi-gods, emperors, or saints) in religious practice.

• The concept of a “god-man” mediator echoes figures like Hercules or Dionysus (and many others, 2,000+ years before the New Testament messiah), and stands in opposition to the pure monotheism of the Hebrew Torah.

• These two verses explicitly identify, by the word of the God of Israel Himself, who His son is:

  • Exodus 4:22 – “Thus says YaHuWaH: Israel is My son, My firstborn.”

  • Hosea 11:1 – “When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called My son.”

• There is no ambiguity—YaHuWaH calls the nation of Israel His son, not a New Testament figure. His Word (Torah) is unchanging and speaks for itself. This passage is quoted in Matthew 2:15, but when examined in its proper context, the “son” being referred to is Israel, not Jesus, YaHaWaShi, or YaHuWShuWA. The phrase “Out of Egypt I called My son” appears only once in all of Scripture, and that is in Hosea 11:1, where it clearly identifies Israel as YaHuWaH’s firstborn and anointed.

  🧠 Theological Conflict

• The concept of "the Word made flesh" does not exist in the Hebrew Torah and is another forbidden addition. The idea of “the Word becoming flesh” is a Hellenistic (Greek-influenced) idea rooted in logos theology, heavily influenced by Greek philosophy (like that of Philo of Alexandria) and Platonism, not the Hebrew Torah.

  • In Greek philosophy, Logos (Word) was considered a divine agent, a rational principle that mediates between the divine and the material world.

  • The Book of John adapts this idea, merging it with the story of Jesus, Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, or YaHuWShuWA, etc.
    
    

4. Idol Worship by Torah Standards

The Torah is unambiguous about idolatry:

• Worshiping or serving any being besides YaHuWaH—whether images, humans, or supposed heavenly beings—is strictly forbidden.

• Exodus 20:5 – “You shall not bow down to them nor serve them.”

• Deuteronomy 13 warns about false prophets who lead people away from YaHuWaH, even if they do signs and wonders.

• Isaiah 45:21-22 “21 Tell ye, and bring them near; yea, let them take counsel together: who hath declared this from ancient time? Who hath told it from that time? Have not I YaHuWaH? and there is NO God else beside me; a just God and a Saviour; there is NONE beside me.

  22 Look unto ME, and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth: for I am God, and there is NONE else”.

Thus, calling on, bowing to, sharing on social media, promoting worshiping the Creator through any version of a New Testament Messiah/idol demigod —violates the Torah's clear commands.

5. Contrast in Obedience

6. Conclusion: The Real Word of YaHuWaH Is the Torah

So when New Testament followers say, “Everyone wants YaHuWaH’s blessings but not His Word,” they fail to realize that His Word is the unchanging Torah, not a new doctrine centered on a mediator figure. By placing faith in a human who is worshiped, prayed to, and given titles that belong only to the Most High, they violate the very obedience they claim to defend.

This is why the statement is not just hypocritical—it reveals a deeper misunderstanding of who YaHuWaH is, what His Word truly is, and what it means to walk in obedience to His commands without compromise or idolatrous substitutions.

FINAL THOUGHTS:

All religions often capitalize on the insecurities of their followers, planting the belief that they themselves are incapable of changing their lifestyle to please the God of Israel. This then leads to the promotion of a New Testament savior, who is said to do all the work on their behalf—just believe in him, and he will advocate for you at the right hand of the Creator. However, this concept is nowhere to be found in the Torah. Why? Because it is an addition to the Torah, something explicitly forbidden. Nowhere in the Torah does it say that accepting this messiah into your heart makes you worthy in the eyes of the God of Israel.

The story of the New Testament Messiah is undeniably compelling and emotionally powerful. After all, who wouldn't be drawn to the idea of someone who doesn’t even know you, will never leave you constantly advocating on your behalf, agreeing to bear your sorrows and burdens, and declaring you righteous in the eyes of the Creator simply by accepting him? While this narrative is extremely popular and may offer temporal emotional comfort, it presents a non-Torah-based concept that ultimately removes personal accountability. It allows believers to feel justified in sinning without requiring genuine transformation or obedience to the Hebrew Torah—the very foundation of the Creator’s instructions.

This is exactly why there are over 200 distinct New Testament-based doctrines in the United States alone, and more than 45,000 worldwide. Such staggering variation is clear evidence that these deviations from the Torah are rooted in emotional interpretations and foundations that are not grounded in the Torah. These belief systems shift according to personal perspectives, social trends, and emotional inclinations, rather than being rooted in the unchanging Word declared by the God of Israel.

According to the God of Israel and His Torah, sin is defined as the breaking of His commandments. One of those foundational commandments is to worship Him alone, without the use of any intermediary, mediator, or demigod-like savior. To do otherwise is a direct violation of His instructions—an act of sin. Therefore, when New Testament believers reject this truth and continue to follow doctrines that promote worship through another figure, they are living in ongoing disobedience, and by Torah standards, are continuously in sin.

Based on the Torah’s own definition of sin and worship, we can conclude that no New Testament Messiah figure, including Jesus or any variation (Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA, etc.), can rectify or override the first commandment.

Exodus 20:3, “You shall have NO other gods before My face.”

Deuteronomy 5:7 "Thou shalt have none other gods before My face".

The phrase “NO other gods before My face” (Hebrew: AL PâNîYM) literally means in My presence, in front of, before Me, or in place of Me. This does not only refer to pagan idols—it applies to any being, doctrine, or system placed in the position of receiving worship, praise, or spiritual access in a way that bypasses YaHuWaH Himself. Teaching, sharing, or practicing worship through any Messiah figure is itself a violation of that very command, making it a perpetual state of sin according to the God of Israel’s own Word.

✨ Why This Matters:

• In ancient Hebrew thought, “face” (paniym) is symbolic of presence, relationship, and direct interaction.

• Therefore, this command doesn’t just ban foreign gods or statues—it forbids placing anything in YaHuWaH’s space of honor, worship, and relational access, including mediators or messianic figures.

🔁 Common English Translations:

• Most Bibles render it as “before Me” (KJV, ESV, NASB, etc.), but Hebrew scholars often acknowledge “before My face” as the more literal and contextual translation.

For example:

• The Interlinear Hebrew Bible will show this direct translation.

• Scholars like Robert Alter and the JPS Tanakh often note this deeper meaning of panai (from the root paniym = face).

Summary:

The phrase “before My face” is a literal translation of the Hebrew “al panai” in Exodus 20:3. It carries a weight far beyond just ranking gods—it forbids placing any being, image, or concept in the presence, role, or relational position meant for YaHuWaH alone.

IRON SHARPENETH IRON

QUESTION: I am no longer a Christian and have been devoting more time each day to studying the Torah. A friend and I have been going back and forth about the Bible, and he recently tagged me in a post quoting Proverbs 27:17 from the Old Testament. He implied that the teachings of Jesus should be what 'sharpens' me. I’m not a scholar, but aren’t the morals and beliefs found in the Old Testament rooted in the unchanging Torah, which was given to the Hebrews and was followed a thousand years before Christianity?

ANSWER: Yes, over a millennium, the people of Israel, through judges, kings, prophets, and into the post-exilic period, were bound to and judged by Torah law, not by Christian doctrines (which didn’t exist yet). The Torah was followed for over 1,000 years before Christianity ever appeared. It formed the bedrock of Hebrew identity, law, and lifestyle long before the New Testament and its messiah was written or compiled. So, it’s historically and biblically clear that Torah, not Christianity, was the guiding foundation of that region. With that stated, in the proper Hebrew context, Proverbs 27:17 "Iron sharpens iron; so a man sharpens the countenance of his friend" is not explicitly referring to the Torah by name, however, Torah principles are strongly embedded in its meaning.

Here’s a breakdown in context:

🔹 Hebrew Understanding

• The Hebrew phrase "יַחַד פְּנֵי רֵעֵהוּ" (yachad p’niy ra’huw) implies more than just interaction — it’s about mutual sharpening, refinement, and moral development.

• The use of “iron sharpening iron” is metaphorical, pointing to the power of human interaction, especially within righteous relationships, to refine wisdom, character, and behavior.

🔹 Does it refer to Torah?

• While the verse does not mention “Torah” explicitly, in the wisdom literature of Proverbs, “sharpening” or “growing in wisdom” is inherently connected to living by Torah.

• In Hebrew thought, wisdom is not secular — it's rooted in the fear of YaHuWaH and obedience to His unchanging commandments (see Proverbs 1:7).

• Therefore, the sharpening spoken of here is not simply intellectual — it's moral and spiritual sharpening, which implies living according to the Torah.

🔹 Summary in Hebrew Context:

Proverbs 27:17 teaches that righteous relationships refine the soul, just as iron sharpens iron. A friend committed to truth and Torah will challenge, correct, and uplift another, leading both to greater alignment with YaHuWaH’s ways. This sharpening is not emotional flattery, but constructive, Torah-centered growth.

So yes, while not directly mentioning Torah, the verse implicitly upholds the Hebrew Torah values of love, truth, correction, and growth in righteousness. Regarding Proverbs 27:17, when sharing the full truth of the God of Israel as found in the Hebrew Bible with a New Testament believer who also quotes the same verse, their hypocrisy becomes evident when they refuse to hear that the Creator of all things commands exclusive worship, rejecting all intermediaries or mediators as idolatry. Their unwillingness to accept this truth contradicts the very principle of mutual sharpening, as they resist correction and cling to doctrines that oppose the clear words of YaHuWaH.

To be a lion or like a lion, one must surround oneself with and engage in conversation with other lions. The same principle applies to anyone seeking transformation—if one desires to live a healthy lifestyle, one must converse with and implement proven eating and workout habits that have led others to real change. These changes often challenge personal or social views, requiring a willingness to be humbled, to learn new truths, and to avoid leading with emotion.

Likewise, if an alcoholic desires to break free from addiction, it is in their best interest to stop associating with other alcoholics who reinforce the very habits they seek to escape. The same applies when seeking the truth of the Hebrew Bible and the perspective of the God of Israel. It is pointless to continue associating with or seeking out people and social groups that only reinforce non-Torah perspectives, as this prevents any true challenge to change. This includes churches and all groups, sects, or camps that promote the worship of intermediaries instead of exclusive devotion to the God of Israel. True growth and sharpening come from engaging with those who uphold YaHuWaH’s truth, even when it conflicts with personal comfort or longstanding beliefs.

While many translations render the second part of the verse loosely (and sometimes omit key Hebrew nuances), the Hebrew wording reflects the sharpening or improving of a person, not through flattery or enabling, but through honest, loving confrontation. The Torah teaches that true love (AHaB) is expressed by seeking the best for another’s soul, and that includes Torah correction when necessary:

“You shall not hate your brother in your heart. You shall surely rebuke your neighbor, and not bear sin because of him.”
— Leviticus 19:17

This verse from the Torah aligns perfectly with Proverbs 27:17, showing that true friendship is not about sparing feelings when truth is at stake. Instead, it’s about loving enough to speak the truth even when it’s uncomfortable. So, “the countenance of his friend” doesn’t imply appeasement, but uplifting through truth. A real friend sharpens another like iron, not with flattery, but with righteous correction, encouragement, and accountability rooted in Torah.

Proper Hebrew Context Summary

In Hebrew thought, this verse conveys the idea that just as iron tools are refined and sharpened through friction with other iron, people refine, strengthen, and improve one another through meaningful interactions.

• Sharpening symbolizes growth and refinement – Just as iron rubbing against iron removes dullness, individuals sharpen one another through honest discussion, correction, and shared wisdom.

• Mutual accountability – In Hebrew culture, wisdom and understanding are strengthened through fellowship and constructive challenge. This aligns with the Torah’s emphasis on communal learning (Deuteronomy 6:6-7).

• Face-to-face interaction – The term countenance (פָּנִים, panim) suggests that this sharpening happens in personal relationships, where character, understanding, and discernment are refined.

This verse does not promote blind agreement but rather intellectual and spiritual sharpening through genuine interaction, much like how the Israelites were expected to challenge and uphold one another in the pursuit of YaHuWaH’s unchanging truth found in the Hebrew Torah.

Comparing and Contrasting Proverbs 27:17

This verse highlights the importance of mutual refinement, where individuals strengthen each other through discussion, correctional alignment with the Torah, and the pursuit of truth. However, when applied to the contrast between one who upholds the Hebrew Bible’s truth about YaHuWaH and a New Testament believer who resists His truth, a stark difference emerges.

Application to the God of Israel’s Truth (Hebrew Bible Perspective)

• Truth-Based Sharpening: When two individuals seek YaHuWaH’s truth, they sharpen one another by reinforcing what is already established and unchanging in the Hebrew Bible—that YaHuWaH alone is to be worshiped (Isaiah 42:8, Deuteronomy 6:4).

• Mutual Edification: True sharpening requires openness to correction, meaning both individuals must be willing to accept and grow in YaHuWaH’s unchanging truth, which is clearly against mediators (Isaiah 43:11).

• Spiritual Integrity: The sharpening process in the Hebrew Bible is based on obedience to the Creator’s instructions in the Hebrew Torah, rejecting anything that contradicts His commands.

Contrast with a New Testament Believer Who Rejects This Truth

• Selective Application: A New Testament believer may quote Proverbs 27:17 but reject sharpening when it challenges their belief in a mediator/savior. They may claim to seek the truth but refuse correction regarding YaHuWaH’s unchanging command to be worshiped alone.

• Hypocrisy in Dialogue: True sharpening requires both parties to engage honestly. However, a person who ignores or resists YaHuWaH’s clear statements against intermediaries (Exodus 20:3-5, Hosea 13:4) is not sharpening but dulling the truth by clinging to false doctrine.

• Emotional vs. Scriptural Defense: Instead of being sharpened by the Creator and God of Israel's unchanging Torah, many rely on emotional arguments, only New Testament verses of scripture, the worship of Jesus, Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA, and church or social group traditions to avoid confronting the contradiction in their beliefs.

Conclusion

In proper Hebrew context, Proverbs 27:17 applies only when both individuals seek and accept the refining power of YaHuWaH’s unchanging truth in His Torah. A New Testament believer who quotes this verse but refuses to acknowledge that YaHuWaH alone is the Savior is not sharpening iron but resisting correction. True sharpening requires a willingness to abandon falsehood and embrace the unaltered words of the Creator and God of Israel. Even the New Testament teaches to abandon falsehood.

• Ephesians 4:25 (KJV): “Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour: for we are members one of another.”

• 1 Thessalonians 5:21 (KJV): “Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.”

• 2 Timothy 2:15 (KJV): “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.”

However, the issue arises when New Testament believers selectively apply this principle—claiming to abandon falsehood but rejecting the Hebrew Torah’s foundational truth that the God of Israel alone is to be worshiped (Isaiah 42:8, Deuteronomy 6:4). If one truly seeks to "prove all things," they must examine whether the belief in an intermediary contradicts YaHuWaH’s own words in the Torah and by His chosen Prophets.

Thus, while the New Testament encourages abandoning deception, the real question is whether its followers fully apply this teaching when confronted with YaHuWaH’s unchanging commandments in the Hebrew Torah that challenge their inherited beliefs.

running from YaHuWaH correction

When New Testament believers are confronted with the God of Israel’s unchanging commandments, which explicitly forbid participating in pagan ways of worship (Deuteronomy 12:30-31), honoring other gods (Exodus 23:13), and adopting worldly holidays that give glory to idols and intermediaries (Jeremiah 10:2-4), many resist being sharpened. Instead of allowing the truth to refine them, they often defend inherited traditions and emotional desires, dismissing the Torah’s warnings and clinging to customs that contradict YaHuWaH’s instructions. Here are several Hebrew Scriptures where the God of Israel commands His people not to worship the ways of the nations and makes it clear that no other god or idol is to share in His glory:

1. YaHuWaH Alone is to Be Worshiped

• Deuteronomy 6:4 (KJV) – “Hear, O Israel: YaHuWaH our God is one YaHuWaH.”

• Exodus 20:3-5 (KJV) – “Thou shalt have no other gods before me. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them.”

• Isaiah 45:5 (KJV) – “I am YaHuWaH, and there is none else, there is no God beside me.”

2. Do Not Worship in the Ways of the Nations

• Deuteronomy 12:30-31 (KJV) – “Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou enquire not after their gods, saying, How did these nations serve their gods? Even so will I do likewise. Thou shalt not do so unto YaHuWaH thy God: for every abomination to YaHuWaH, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods.”

• Leviticus 18:3 (KJV) – “After the doings of the land of Egypt, wherein ye dwelt, shall ye not do: and after the doings of the land of Canaan, whither I bring you, shall ye not do: neither shall ye walk in their ordinances.”

• Jeremiah 10:2 (KJV) – “Thus saith YaHuWaH, Learn not the way of the heathen.”

3. YaHuWaH Will Not Share His Glory with Another

• Isaiah 42:8 (KJV) – “I am YaHuWaH: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images.”

• Isaiah 48:11 (KJV) – “For mine own sake, even for mine own sake, will I do it: for how should my name be polluted? and I will not give my glory unto another.”

4. Do Not Follow Idolatrous Practices

• Exodus 23:13 (KJV) – “And in all things that I have said unto you be circumspect: and make no mention of the name of other gods, neither let it be heard out of thy mouth.”

• Deuteronomy 7:25-26 (KJV) – “The graven images of their gods shall ye burn with fire: thou shalt not desire the silver or gold that is on them, nor take it unto thee, lest thou be snared therein: for it is an abomination to YaHuWaH thy God.”

• Hosea 13:4 (KJV) – “Yet I am YaHuWaH thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me: for there is no saviour beside me.”

These verses confirm that the God of Israel commands His people to worship Him alone, reject pagan customs, and not give His glory to another. Worshipping the God of Israel through idols, intermediaries, or adopting the ways of the nations is strictly forbidden.

QUESTION: If the God of Israel is perfect and righteous, why do many so-called Hebrew groups and Christian churches experience contention, disbandment, racial divisions, and conflicting doctrines? I see several people on social media coming together and promoting their set-apart gatherings. Doesn’t scripture state that only YaHuWaH will regather and restore Israel, at which point all will follow the Torah under the leadership of His Messiah?

ANSWER: Yes, great question and 100% accurate. This simple logic challenges the common assumption that every scripture-based group, especially those claiming to follow the God of Israel, is divinely established. Your observation aligns with what the Hebrew Bible teaches—everything the God of Israel does is perfect (without needing change), just, and righteous (Deuteronomy 32:4). If confusion, division, disbandment and contradictions of His Torah exist within these groups, it is clear that they are the result of human choices rather than divine orchestration.

The Hebrew Bible repeatedly emphasizes that the God of Israel grants free will and does not force individuals or groups to follow His ways (Deuteronomy 30:19). When people form groups or organizations based on their own interpretations, biases, or hidden agendas, rather than strictly adhering to the Torah, the result is often contention, disagreement, fall out, unfriending, being blocked on social media, and even false doctrines. This is not the work of the God of Israel, but rather the result of human choices and interpretations. Some may argue that when things don’t go as planned, it’s the “hand of God” redirecting them toward something greater. However, this idea is yet another human addition—a comforting narrative not found in the Torah. In fact, it contradicts the very nature of the God of Israel, who grants free will and does not operate as a puppet master controlling one’s every move.

Furthermore, the Hebrew Bible states that only the God of Israel will regather His people in the final redemption (Isaiah 11:12, Ezekiel 37:21-28). This gathering is not something human organizations or leaders can force, nor is it a scattered attempt by various groups claiming to be the "true" Israel. The full restoration of Israel will only take place under divine authority when all will follow the Torah in unity, and the Messiah will lead Israel in righteousness (Jeremiah 23:5-6, Ezekiel 34:23-24). So, while many groups claim to be formed by divine will, their divisions, contradictions, and mere actions prove otherwise. They are the product of human effort, not the perfect work of the God of Israel. True unity under the Torah will only come when the God of Israel Himself restores Israel (His anointed and firstborn son, Exodus 4:22-23 and Hosea 11:1) and appoints His prince according to His promises.

We have firsthand experiences that further prove this point. Since 2017, we (WOTR) have met many people from various cultures in person and on Skype, Google Hangouts, FaceTime, etc., and have conducted numerous yearly fellowships around the US. Yet over the years, many individuals have come and gone. Some caused contention, attempted to divide racially, or stirred other forms of discord. This reality reinforces the fact that people choose to gather based on their own choice, desire, and hidden agendas, and just because something is done in the name of YaHuWaH does not mean He ordained it or that it was divinely orchestrated. As we've said before, this website wasn’t created due to a divine calling, a dream, an audible voice, or an emotional or supposed supernatural experience. We chose to build it because of the overwhelming lack of Hebrew Torah truth both online and in Christian churches.

Due to the conditioning of Christianity, many leaders, teachers, and mentors assume that any biblical idea they receive must be from the Creator (for example: starting a church or creating a group or sect). Once they claim divine inspiration or people believe they are divinely inspired, people often fear that not following them will bring negative consequences. However, the God of Israel does not control every detail of people’s lives; rather, He grants them free will. Individuals make choices that naturally lead to various outcomes—both good and bad—based on their personal decisions influenced by fear, facts, or emotions. Simply put, no matter how good an idea sounds, if that person’s actions or lifestyle contradict the unchanging Hebrew Torah, it can easily be dismissed.

Because many have chosen to follow teachings outside the divine instructions given by the God of Israel, such as churches that prioritize the New Testament over the Torah, Christian establishments are closing at an accelerating rate. Projections estimate that by 2050, over 100,000 churches may shut their doors. As more people gain access to historical facts, original texts, and verifiable evidence, they are turning away from teachings proven to be inconsistent with truth. Even New Testament believers know they are to reject all forms of deceit and falsehood—yet many still choose sin simply because it feels comfortable (Ephesians 4:25, 2 Corinthians 4:2, 1 John 4:1, Matthew 15:9).

The Hebrew Bible shows that true divine orchestration is unmistakable—it leads to peace, righteousness, and alignment with YaHuWaH’s Torah (Psalm 119:165, Isaiah 26:3). When confusion, division, or strife arise, it is evident that human choices and personal agendas are at play rather than YaHuWaH’s direct involvement. The restoration of Israel and true unity will not be a product of carnally-led organizations but will occur only when YaHuWaH Himself regathers His people and establishes His Torah under the leadership of His appointed prince, and coming Messiah in the Messianic Kingdom (Ezekiel 37:21-28, Isaiah 11:12).

This understanding serves as a strong reminder that while people may come together in fellowship, the true ingathering and restoration of Israel is not something that humans can manufacture—it remains solely in the hands of YaHuWaH.

QUESTION: I see Christians and many Black Hebrew Israelite camps for Christ spreading their doctrine of serving God through an intermediary outside the US. Is this a divine call or a personal ambition?

ANSWER: The idea of global evangelism and conversion is a concept that appears in Christianity (e.g., Matthew 28:19-20, 1 Corinthians 11:1, Ephesians 5:1-2, Romans 8:29, and 1 John 2:6), and because some Black Hebrew Israelite sects believe in the New Testament, they follow suit. However, this practice did not originate in the Hebrew Torah or the teachings given to Israel by YaHuWaH. Instead, the Hebrew Bible presents a model where Israel is a righteous nation living by YaHuWaH’s laws, attracting others through their example rather than through active missionary efforts.

Both of these religions or belief systems claim that the unchanging Hebrew Torah is their foundational guideline. If so, we must ask the critical question: Where in the Hebrew Bible did the God of Israel command His chosen prophets or the nation of Israel to travel the world, spread the Torah, and convert people to Israel? Nowhere in the entire Hebrew Bible (TaNaKh) does the God of Israel, YaHuWaH, command His chosen prophets or the nation of Israel to travel the world to convert people to the Torah or to make them become Israelites by way of shaming.

This concept, however, is found in several places in the New Testament, where believers are encouraged to be Christ-like and become fishers of men (Mark 1:17). Being "Christ-like" typically involves following and spreading the teachings and example of the New Testament Messiah (aka Jesus, Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA, etc.), emphasizing love, grace, and service, rather than sole devotion to the God of Israel and His unchanging Torah. In contrast, the Hebrew Torah designates Israel as a nation set apart, commanded to live daily according to YaHuWaH’s laws and serve as an example to other nations, rather than actively proselytizing them.

WHAT DOES TORAH SAY?

Here are a few key points and torah references that highlight this distinction:

1. Israel as a Light to the Nations (Indirect Influence, Not Missionary Work)

   • Isaiah 42:6: “I, YaHuWaH, have called you in righteousness, and will hold your hand, and will keep you, and give you for a covenant of the people, for a light to the nations.”

   • Isaiah 49:6: “It is too small a thing for you to be my servant to restore the tribes of Jacob and bring back those of Israel I have kept. I will also make you a light for the nations, that my salvation may reach to the ends of the earth.”
     These verses indicate that Israel was to serve as an example through their way of life, not through traveling to convert others.

   2. Torah Given to Israel, Not Commanded for Conversion of Other Nations

   • Deuteronomy 4:5-8: “See, I have taught you statutes and judgments, just as YaHuWaH, my mighty one, commanded me, that you should do so in the land where you are entering to possess it. So keep them and do them, for this is your wisdom and understanding in the sight of the peoples who will hear all these statutes and say, ‘Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people.’”
     This passage emphasizes that other nations would witness Israel’s righteousness and be drawn to it, not that Israel should go and forcefully spread the Torah.

2. No Command to Convert Others

   Unlike Christianity and the Black Hebrew Israelite camps that actively proselytize, Israel was never commanded to seek converts. While non-Israelites (strangers/sojourners) were welcome to join Israel if they chose to (Exodus 12:48-49, Isaiah 56:6-7), there was no mandate to go out and make disciples.

3. YaHuWaH’s Focus is on Israel’s Obedience, Not Proselytizing

   • Deuteronomy 7:6: “For you are a holy people to YaHuWaH your mighty one; YaHuWaH your mighty one has chosen you to be a special people to Himself, above all people that are on the face of the earth.”
     This affirms Israel’s distinct role but does not command them to seek converts.

   Israel is given the freedom to choose, but they are reminded of their responsibility. The idea of global evangelism and conversion is a concept that appears in Christianity (e.g., Matthew 28:19-20) and some Black Hebrew Israelite sects but does not originate in the Hebrew Torah or the teachings given to Israel by YaHuWaH. Instead, the Hebrew Bible presents a model where Israel is a righteous nation living by YaHuWaH’s laws, attracting others through their lifestyle of obedience rather than through active missionary efforts or shaming.

Living in obedience to the Hebrew Torah as a lifestyle is what YaHuWaH commanded Israel to do, making them a nation set apart. This naturally serves as an example to others. However, proselytizing—actively seeking to convert others—is a different concept entirely and is not commanded anywhere in the Hebrew Bible.

These verses show that people will come to Israel because of their obedience and wisdom to the Torah, not because Israel is commanded to go out and convert the world. In contrast, proselytizing—going out to actively seek and persuade others to convert—is a practice found in many religions like Christianity, and among some Black Hebrew Israelite camps, but it is not a commandment from YaHuWaH to His chosen people in the Hebrew Bible.

Free Will to Follow YaHuWaH’s Torah

YaHuWaH makes it clear that each person has the freedom to choose whether to obey His commandments or not. He presents a choice with consequences based on obedience or disobedience:

• Deuteronomy 30:19-20 – “I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, the blessing and the curse. So choose life in order that you may live, you and your descendants, by loving YaHuWaH your mighty one, by obeying His voice, and by holding fast to Him.”

  • This passage shows that following YaHuWaH’s Torah is a choice, but He urges His people to choose life.

• Joshua 24:15 – “And if it seems evil to you to serve YaHuWaH, choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve… But as for me and my house, we will serve YaHuWaH.”

  • Again, Israel is given the freedom to choose, but they are reminded of their responsibility.

YaHuWaH Allows Deception to Test His People

We also know that YaHuWaH allows deception and false teachings to exist as a test to see if His people truly love Him and obey His Torah:

• Deuteronomy 13:1-3 – “If a prophet or a dreamer of dreams arises among you and gives you a sign or a wonder, and the sign or wonder comes true, concerning which he spoke to you, saying, ‘Let us go after other gods whom you have not known, and let us serve them,’ you shall not listen to the words of that prophet or that dreamer of dreams; for YaHuWaH your mighty one is testing you to find out if you love YaHuWaH your mighty one with all your heart and with all your soul.”

  • This passage explains that even if a false prophet performs miracles or signs, they can still be false—YaHuWaH allows this as a test to see if His people remain loyal to His Torah.

• Isaiah 8:20 – “To the Torah and to the testimony! If they do not speak according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.”

  • Any teaching or doctrine that contradicts the unchanging Hebrew Torah is not from YaHuWaH, no matter how appealing, successful, or miraculous it may seem. If someone claims that God gave them a message or permission to do something, yet their actions or the outcome contradict His Torah, it is most likely driven by personal desire.

Unlike Christianity and certain Black Hebrew Israelite camps that actively seek to convert others, the Hebrew Bible does not command Israel to proselytize. Instead, YaHuWaH gives people the freedom to choose to follow His Torah. He also allows deception as a test, ensuring that only those who truly love Him and His laws remain faithful. This is why it is essential to measure all teachings, doctrines, and opinions against the unchanging Hebrew Torah, rather than blindly following popular trends, large groups or organizations, charismatic and eloquent speakers, or those who promote the worship of intermediaries.

For a more in-depth exploration of the topic of proselytizing through the perspective of the Hebrew Torah and its relevance in Western culture, consider becoming a WOTR member. Membership offers exclusive access to full-length videos, over 250 pages of content, scholarly resources, and downloadable study guides for both adults and children, providing valuable tools to enhance your learning journey.

QUESTION: New Testament believers argue their Messiah was not yet separated from the Trinity at the time of Isaiah 45:5, which is why the God of Israel declares, "There is no God beside me"? Could you explain this perspective further?

Isaiah 45:5 states:

"I am YaHuWaH, and there is NONE else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me."

ANSWER: In this context, the phrase "no God (or mighty one) beside me" is generally understood to mean "there is no other God except Me." It emphasizes the absolute oneness and exclusivity of the God of Israel. The Hebrew word used here is "בִּלְעָדַי" (bil’adiy), which means "apart from me" or "besides me" in the sense of "no other" or "none comparable."

Contextual Meaning in Isaiah 45:5

• The Creator is affirming His unmatched sovereignty and authority.

• It refutes the belief in multiple deities, common in surrounding pagan cultures.

• The emphasis is on monotheism, declaring that there is no divine being who stands as an equal or rival to the God of Israel.

Can It Mean Both ‘Next To’ and ‘Other Than’?

In this context, it does not mean "next to" the God of Israel. The phrase is exclusive in nature, denying the existence of any other deity. Unlike modern English, Hebrew words often carry layered meanings, but the primary meaning in Isaiah 45:5 is clear — "no God other than Me."

Addressing the New Testament Claims

In Christian theology and among New Testament followers, "sitting at the right hand of God" symbolizes a place of honor, authority, and power, commonly used to represent Jesus, Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA, etc., has elevated status following his resurrection and ascension. The New Testament verses (e.g., 1 Peter 3:22, Revelation 3:21, Acts 2:33) claim that a New Testament Messiah is seated at the right hand of the Creator. This concept implies a distinction between the Messiah and the God of Israel, often suggesting a divine partnership or shared authority. However, this view contradicts the strict monotheism affirmed in Isaiah 45:5 and denies the exclusive non-sharing authority of YaHuWaH

Isaiah 42:8

“I am YaHuWaH: that is my name: and my glory will I NOT GIVE to another, neither my praise to graven images.”

In the Hebrew context, the Creator and God of Israel is singular and indivisible. While the "right hand" is sometimes used metaphorically in the Hebrew Bible to symbolize power or authority (e.g., Exodus 15:6, Psalm 118:16), it is not used to imply the presence of another deity seated next to the Creator. Therefore, applying the concept of a separate divine figure contradicts the Hebrew understanding of the Creator's oneness.

Isaiah 45:5 does not support the idea of a New Testament Messiah seated beside the Creator. The phrase "no God beside me" exclusively emphasizes that the God of Israel is the only true God, with no other divine being sharing His status or authority.

WHAT DOES TORAH SAY

To evaluate the New Testament claims (e.g., 1 Peter 3:22, Revelation 3:21, Acts 2:33) suggesting that a New Testament Messiah sits at the right hand of the Creator, we can simply turn to several Hebrew Bible verses that emphasize the oneness, sovereignty, and exclusivity of the God of Israel. Christians and New Testament followers agree that the Hebrew Torah is the sacred, unchanging word and commandments of the God of Israel, serving as the foundation of their faith.

They acknowledge that their beliefs are rooted in these eternal principles, and without these established concepts of the Hebrew Torah, Christianity and the claims of the New Testament crumble. Additionally, they agree that no one has the authority to add to or subtract from it, not even the Creator, as doing so would undermine His character as the unchanging, one true God. With this understanding as the foundation, the following scriptures reinforce the idea that there is no divine being alongside or equal to the God of Israel.

1. Deuteronomy 4:35 (KJV)

"Unto thee it was shewed, that thou mightest know that YaHuWaH He is God; there is none else beside him."

• This verse explicitly states that there is no other deity besides the God of Israel. It emphasizes His unique and unrivaled divinity.

2. Deuteronomy 32:39 (KJV)

"See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand."

• The phrase “there is no god with me” is a direct refutation of the idea that another divine figure could sit at His right hand. It declares that no other entity shares divine authority with the Creator.

3. Isaiah 43:10-11 (KJV)

"Ye are my witnesses, saith YaHuWaH, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me. I, even I, am YaHuWaH; and beside me there is no saviour."

• This passage rejects the notion of another divine being. It also emphasizes that the God of Israel alone is the savior, countering claims that salvation can come through a separate Messiah.

4. Isaiah 44:6 (KJV)

"Thus saith YaHuWaH the King of Israel, and his redeemer YaHuWaH of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God."

• The Creator declares Himself as the only God, directly opposing any belief in a separate divine figure.

5. Hosea 13:4 (KJV)

"Yet I am YaHuWaH thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me: for there is no saviour beside me."

• This verse affirms that the God of Israel alone is the savior of His people, denying the existence of another savior or intermediary.

6. Exodus 20:3 (KJV)

"Thou shalt have no other gods before me."

• This commandment reinforces the concept of exclusive worship of the God of Israel, disallowing the elevation of any other figure to divine status. This includes worshiping or praying through any intermediaries, demigods, or mediators as a means of reaching the God of Israel.

7. Psalm 83:18 (KJV)

"That men may know that thou, whose name alone is YaHuWaH, art the most high over all the earth."

• The Creator is declared as the highest authority with no other being sharing in His divine position.

Conclusion

Isaiah 45:5 does not support the concept of a New Testament Messiah seated beside the Creator. Moreover, nowhere in the Hebrew TaNaKh is this idea acknowledged or practiced by the chosen Hebrew prophets of YaHuWaH. The phrase "no God beside me" exclusively emphasizes that the God of Israel, YaHuWaH is the only true mighty one, with no other divine being sharing His status, authority or that His works must be conducted through an intermediary (Exodus 34:14, Deuteronomy 4:35, 32:39, Isaiah 42:8, 43:10-11, 48:11).

The Hebrew Bible consistently asserts the absolute oneness and sovereignty of the God of Israel. Claims in the New Testament about a Messiah seated at the right hand of YaHuWaH or acting as a co-reigning divine figure are in direct contradicton of the Hebrew Torah. According to the Torah and the Hebrew Bible (TaNaKh), claiming that a divine mediator sits at the right hand of YaHuWaH and shares His authority would be considered blasphemy and a violation of His exclusive sovereignty. The repeated declarations of "no God beside Me" leave no room for the concept of a separate divine Messiah or advocate. According to the Hebrew Torah, praying through intermediaries, demigods, or mediators as a means of reaching the God of Israel is idol worship.

In the Hebrew Bible, when the Hebrews continue in idolatry, they face severe consequences as a result of breaking their covenant with the God of Israel. The covenant established through the Torah explicitly warns of both blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience, including the worship of other gods. Here are some consequences of idolatry mentioned in the Hebrew Bible:

1. Separation from YaHuWaH

• Isaiah 59:2 (KJV) — "But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear."

• Idolatry creates a spiritual separation, distancing the people from the presence and guidance of YaHuWaH.

2. Destruction and Exile

• 2 Kings 17:18 (KJV) — "Therefore YaHuWaH was very angry with Israel, and removed them out of his sight: there was none left but the tribe of Judah only."

• Both the northern kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah faced destruction and exile as a direct result of their idolatry. The Assyrians conquered Israel, and the Babylonians exiled Judah.

3. Famine, Disease, and War

• Leviticus 26:25-26 (KJV) — "And I will bring a sword upon you, that shall avenge the quarrel of my covenant: and when ye are gathered together within your cities, I will send the pestilence among you; and ye shall be delivered into the hand of the enemy."

• The people experienced war, famine, and disease as divine punishment for turning to idols.

4. Loss of Protection and Prosperity

• Deuteronomy 28:15-20 (KJV) — "But it shall come to pass, if thou wilt not hearken unto the voice of YaHuWaH thy God, to observe to do all his commandments and his statutes which I command thee this day; that all these curses shall come upon thee, and overtake thee."

• Idolatry led to a loss of divine protection, resulting in oppression from enemies and economic hardship.

5. Destruction of Idols and Altars

• Judges 6:25-27 (KJV) — "And it came to pass the same night, that YaHuWaH said unto him, Take thy father's young bullock... and throw down the altar of BaAL that thy father hath, and cut down the grove that is by it."

• Prophets and leaders like Gideon were often commanded to destroy idols and altars to cleanse the land from idolatry.

6. Call to Repentance

• Despite the severe consequences, the God of Israel consistently called the people to repentance.

• Ezekiel 18:30 (KJV) — "Therefore I will judge you, O house of Israel, every one according to his ways, saith YaHuWaH God. Repent, and turn yourselves from all your transgressions; so iniquity shall not be your ruin."

• Repentance and a return to obedience were always presented as a path to restoration and forgiveness.

Idolatry is seen as a betrayal of the covenant, and spiritual adultery and was met with harsh consequences, including exile, suffering, and divine judgment. However, the God of Israel repeatedly showed mercy, providing opportunities for repentance and restoration. Forsake all forms of idol worship, praying to or giving praise and honor to any intermediaries, demigods, or mediators as a way of reaching the God of Israel. Instead, choose to obey and serve the God of Israel, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob alone, as He has commanded.

Joshua 24:15- 15 And if it seem evil unto you to serve YaHuWaH, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve YaHuWaH.

YaHuWShuWA (Joshua) 24:15, in its proper Hebrew context, is a call to the people of Israel to make a decisive choice about whom they will serve. YaHuWShuWA, as the leader of Israel, challenges the Israelites to choose between serving the idols of their ancestors or the true God, YaHuWaH, who led them out of Egypt. He boldly declares that, as for him and his household, they will serve YaHuWaH alone, reinforcing the importance of loyalty to the Creator and obedience to His commands.

The essence of this verse is about obedience, faithfulness, and the exclusive worship of YaHuWaH, without compromising or aligning with foreign gods. This includes all forms of a New Testament messiah, as the ancestors of Israel never knew or worshiped Jesus, Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA, etc. It calls for a clear, individual decision to honor the God of Israel, reflecting the covenantal relationship between YaHuWaH and His anointed firstborn son, the nation of Israel, His chosen people (Exodus 4:22-23 and Hosea 11:1).

QUESTION: Having been a Christian since a young age, I strongly believed — perhaps even more than other Christians — that by giving financially to God through a New Testament messiah and the church, I would be blessed with clarity, understanding of the New Testament, and worldly success. For years, I devoted my finances and time to various church ministries. However, it wasn't until I stepped away from the church and began reading the Old Testament that I found genuine clarity and a profound peace that surpasses worldly gain. Have you all witnessed the same?

ANSWER: Yes, and your experience is not uncommon, and it reflects a deeper spiritual and psychological process many people go through when they step away from institutionalized religion and return to the foundational texts, like the Hebrew TaNaKh. There are several reasons why leaving the church and focusing on the Old Testament (ToRaH) brought you clarity and peace, despite years of religious financial giving and devotion. A major reason is the advancement of technology, which gives people access to the same resources as pastors and scholars. This levels the playing field, enabling everyone to evaluate facts and evidence objectively, rather than relying solely on blind faith, emotions, and inherited traditions.

1. Relief from Transactional Faith

• Many Christian teachings, especially in churches influenced by the prosperity gospel or seed faith doctrine, present a transactional view of God: give money, receive blessings.

• This creates a performance-based faith where individuals constantly seek validation or material results. When those results don’t come, it often leads to frustration, guilt, or feelings of spiritual inadequacy. Since Christians know the Creator is perfect and incapable of mistakes, the lack of results often leads people to assume they didn’t have enough faith, were unworthy, or that the blessing will come in God’s timing, not their own.

• By stepping away from this mindset and engaging with the ToRaH, which emphasizes obedience, justice, and relationship rather than financial transactions, you experience the peace that comes from understanding that the God of Israel’s favor is not bought but lived through covenantal obedience.

2. Reconnection with the Covenant

• The Hebrew Bible emphasizes a covenantal relationship with YaHuWaH, where obedience to His laws is the foundation for a righteous life. Unlike the uncertainty of waiting for material rewards from financial giving, the ToRaH provides clear, actionable instructions for living a fulfilled life.

• This clarity fosters inner peace because it removes the anxiety of questioning, “Am I doing enough to receive blessings?” Instead, it shifts the focus to, “Am I walking in alignment with YaHuWaH’s ways?”, see the requirements for blessing and curses in Duetormony 28.

3. Breaking Free from Doctrinal Control

• Institutional religion often discourages questioning and promotes reliance on pastors or church leaders to interpret scripture. This can lead to spiritual dependence rather than personal understanding.

• By reading the Hebrew Torah (what Christians call the Old Testament) independently, you reclaimed your ability to think critically and engage directly with the Word of YaHuWaH. This autonomy leads to spiritual growth and deeper clarity.

4. Rediscovering the Character of YaHuWaH

• The ToRaH reveals YaHuWaH as a just, merciful, and covenant-keeping mighty one who values obedience, justice, and compassion over material wealth.

• Many churches misrepresent the God of Israel’s nature, portraying Him as a being who rewards financial giving with prosperity. When you read the Hebrew Torah, you likely encountered a more consistent and authentic understanding of His character, which brought comfort and reassurance.

5. Release from Guilt and Fear

• The prosperity gospel often breeds fear of lack and guilt when blessings don’t materialize. This cycle of fear can distort one’s perception of the God of Israel.

• Returning to the Hebrew Torah’s teachings on obedience and justice likely helped you detach from that fear and find confidence in knowing that YaHuWaH’s love and faithfulness are not contingent on your financial contributions.

6. Experiencing True Peace

• Peace in the Hebrew understanding (ShaLuWM) is not merely the absence of conflict but the presence of wholeness and alignment with YaHuWaH’s will.

• By reading the Old Testament, you may have experienced this Shalom as you embraced a faith based on obedience and covenant rather than transactional expectations.

Conclusion

Your clarity and peace are the results of stepping out of a system that misrepresented the God of Israel’s nature and returning to the foundational truths of the ToRaH. The God of Israel never required you to purchase His blessings. Instead, He invites you to walk in obedience, justice, and love, which naturally cultivates a fulfilling and peaceful life. By seeking Him through His Word rather than religious institutions or individuals who teach against His unchanging word, you found the clarity that had eluded you for so long.

For an in-depth exploration of the prosperity gospel, understanding the Torah, and its relevance in Western culture, consider becoming a WOTR member. Membership offers exclusive access to full-length videos, over 250 pages of content, scholarly resources, and downloadable study guides for both adults and children, providing valuable tools to enhance your learning journey.

QUESTION: Christians insist that Jesus is the true Messiah based on their past personal and emotional experiences, as well as the New Testament's claim that Jesus rose from the dead. How is the unique from other religions?

The Subjectivity of Religious Experiences

ANSWER: One of the strongest arguments in favor of Jesus, Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA, etc., within Christianity and New Testament believers, is a personal or supernatural experience—testimonies of visions, dreams, healings, and emotional transformations. However, this is not unique to Christianity. Many religions and cultures report similar supernatural encounters and insist their god is the right god. Here are just a few:

• Islam: Many Muslims claim dreams of Muhammad or divine guidance from Allah.

• Hinduism: Devotees experience visions and blessings from deities like Vishnu, Krishna, or Shiva.

• Buddhism: Some report enlightenment through meditation or guidance from bodhisattvas.

• Indigenous and Pagan Beliefs: Shamans and spiritualists receive visions from spirits or ancestors.

If personal experiences alone validated religious truth, then every religion claiming divine encounters would be equally legitimate. This highlights a fundamental distinction between the Hebrew Torah and many religious traditions, particularly Christianity. The Hebrew Torah is explicit in its rejection of worship directed toward any being other than YaHuWaH—the one Creator. This prohibition includes men, women, animals, celestial bodies, and any created entity, as outlined in passages like Deuteronomy 4:15-19 and Exodus 20:3-5.

There are numerous claims and reports from Catholics and people in various cultures about experiencing visions or manifestations of the Virgin Mary, often in unexpected places, such as on food, walls, or natural objects. These sightings are frequently interpreted as miraculous and can evoke strong spiritual significance for those who witness them. For example, some Catholics have reported seeing images of the Virgin Mary on food items, such as tortillas or pancakes. These instances often attract attention and can become a supernatural focal point for devotion, leading to gatherings and prayers.

Similarly, in different cultures, people claim to see images of their gods or religious figures in everyday objects or dreams. These experiences can vary widely depending on cultural beliefs and religious practices. In many cases, these sightings are considered signs of divine presence or messages from the divine, reinforcing faith and spiritual connection. These phenomena are often analyzed by both believers, who see them as miraculous, and skeptics, who may attribute them to pareidolia (the tendency to perceive familiar patterns, such as faces, in random stimuli) or other psychological explanations.

While Christians often point to the transformative power of faith in Jesus as the reason behind many miraculous healings and life changes, it's important to recognize that millions of people achieve healing and sustained recovery through various means. Many individuals overcome challenges such as addiction, trauma, and illness all without calling on Jesus, Christian concepts, or religious intervention.

what about atheists

There are numerous examples and evidence that atheists, like individuals from any religious belief system, can recover from sickness and achieve success in various aspects of life, all without calling on Jesus, Christian concepts, or religious intervention. Here are some points to consider:

1. Medical Evidence: Recovery from illness is often attributed to medical treatment, lifestyle diet choices, and personal resilience rather than religious belief. Many atheists seek medical care and utilize healthcare resources to overcome health challenges thus achieving recovery.

2. Historical Figures: Numerous successful individuals who identify as atheists have made significant contributions to society, demonstrating that belief in a deity is not a prerequisite for success or divinely given ideas/blessings. For example:

   • James Watson: Co-discoverer of the structure of DNA and a Nobel Prize winner in Physiology or Medicine.

   • Stephen Hawking: Renowned theoretical physicist who achieved groundbreaking advancements in cosmology despite living with ALS.

   • Marie Curie: The first woman to win a Nobel Prize, recognized for her pioneering work in radioactivity.

   • Isaac Asimov: A prolific science fiction author and biochemist, known for his extensive writings on science and rational thought.

3. Psychological Resilience: Research indicates that personal resilience, social support, and coping mechanisms are crucial factors in recovery from illness and achieving success, regardless of religious belief. Atheists often draw on these strengths as well.

4. Positive Psychology: Studies in positive psychology emphasize that individuals can find meaning and purpose in life through various avenues, including personal achievements, relationships, and contributions to society, without relying on religious frameworks.

5. Health and Well-being: Many atheists prioritize physical and mental well-being through healthy lifestyle choices, which contribute to recovery and success. Engaging in exercise, proper nutrition, and mental health care are practices common among individuals, regardless of their belief systems.

Overall, there is ample evidence that atheists can and do recover from sickness and achieve success in life, underscoring the idea that resilience, determination, and effective use of available resources play a significant role in these outcomes and not Jesus, Christian concepts, or religious intervention.

The Common Fear Factor Across Religions

Furthermore, many religions use fear-based frameworks to compel belief, often centering on heaven or hell as the ultimate reward or punishment. Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, and even some sects of Buddhism emphasize an afterlife where one either enjoys eternal bliss or suffers eternal torment. However, they all contradict one another, which means they cannot all be correct.

Most major religions share this common structure:

• Christianity: Belief in Jesus determines whether one goes to heaven or eternal hell (Matthew 25:46, Revelation 20:15).

• Islam: Following Allah’s commands leads to paradise, while rejection leads to hellfire (Quran 4:56, 39:71-72).

• Hinduism & Buddhism: Actions (karma) determine reincarnation into a better or worse state, with some versions of Hinduism describing an eternal hell-like realm (Naraka).

• Mormonism & Jehovah’s Witnesses: Different levels of heaven and punishment exist for those who reject their teachings.

Each religion claims its path is the only way to avoid punishment, but they contradict one another—which means their fear-driven doctrines cannot all be true.

The Hebrew Bible’s Different Approach

Unlike religion, the Hebrew Scriptures rarely mention hell and do not teach eternal torment as a consequence of sin. Instead, the focus is on obedience to YaHuWaH’s laws, with judgment carried out according to divine justice.

1. No Eternal Hell for Sinners 

• The Torah never describes an everlasting place of torment. Instead, continual sinners are cut off (כרת, karet) from Israel in the messianic kingdom (Exodus 31:14, Leviticus 7:27). This often refers to physical death or separation from the covenant rather than eternal punishment.

2. Judgment Happens on Earth

• The Hebrew Bible teaches that punishment and reward occur in this world, not in an afterlife:

• Deuteronomy 28 – Blessings and curses for Israel are based on obedience to the Torah, affecting their land, health, and prosperity.

• Psalm 37:9-10 – “For evildoers will be cut off, but those who wait on YaHuWaH shall inherit the earth.” Wickedness leads to removal, not eternal suffering.

3. Sheol: A Neutral Place, Not a Place of Torture

• The Hebrew Scriptures describe Sheol as the place of the dead, but it is not a burning hell of eternal torment.

• Ecclesiastes 9:5 – “The dead know nothing; they have no further reward.”

• Job 3:11-19 – Job describes Sheol as a place where both the wicked and the righteous rest. There is no mention of torment.

Mesopotamian Beliefs: The ancient Mesopotamians had beliefs about an underworld where the dead resided, which had both pleasant and unpleasant aspects.

Hellenistic Influences: The interaction between Jewish thought and Hellenistic culture introduced more vivid depictions of the afterlife, including the Greek concepts of Hades and Tartarus, which were associated with punishment for the wicked.

Early Church Interpretation: Early Christian theologians and church fathers further developed the doctrine of hell as a place of eternal torment, influenced by both biblical texts and the philosophical ideas of their time.

New Testament Development: The concept of hell as a place of torment became more pronounced in the New Testament. Jesus speaks of "Gehenna," a term originally referring to a valley outside Jerusalem associated with refuse and possibly child sacrifices.

In summary, the concept of hell as a place of torment evolved from various cultural, religious, and philosophical influences over centuries, particularly during the transition from the Hebrew Bible to the New Testament and the early Christian church. The Hebrew Bible does not mention such a place; instead, many later concepts of hell arose from interactions with neighboring cultures and the evolution of theological thought in response to shifting beliefs about justice, morality, and the afterlife.

Simply Put, They Can’t All Be Right

Religions that rely on fear tactics to gain followers contradict the Torah’s teachings. The Hebrew Bible emphasizes life, obedience, and righteousness in the present world rather than using the afterlife as a coercive tool. Since these fear-based religions contradict one another, they cannot all be correct. The Torah stands apart, offering divine instruction for living rather than a fear-driven doctrine of salvation from eternal torment.

scholarly resources

Here are some scholarly resources and peer-reviewed articles that discuss the phenomena of sightings of religious figures, including the Virgin Mary, and their cultural significance:

1. The Virgin Mary in Contemporary Culture:

   • Faber, M. (2010). "The Virgin Mary and the New Evangelization: The Search for the Marian Identity in Catholic Education." Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 14(4), 429-449.

   • This article explores the contemporary significance of the Virgin Mary in Catholic education and culture, discussing various manifestations and experiences reported by believers.

2. Miraculous Images and Their Significance:

   • Davies, O. (2003). "The 'Miracle' of Seeing the Virgin Mary: The Popular Cult of Marian Apparitions." In The Cult of the Virgin Mary: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives (pp. 37-55). Routledge.

   • This chapter examines various claims of Marian apparitions and their cultural impact, focusing on how these experiences are understood by different communities.

3. Psychological and Cultural Aspects of Religious Experiences:

   • Paloutzian, R. F., & Park, C. L. (2013). "The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach." In The Oxford Handbook of Psychology and Spirituality (pp. 61-76). Oxford University Press.

   • This book provides insights into the psychological and cultural dimensions of religious experiences, including visions and dreams involving religious figures.

4. Pareidolia and Religious Imagery:

   • Hoss, R. (2014). "Seeing Faces in Clouds: A Neuropsychological Perspective on Pareidolia." Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-7.

   • This article discusses the phenomenon of pareidolia, explaining why people perceive images of religious figures in various contexts, including food and natural objects.

5. Cultural Significance of Religious Visions:

   • Ries, N. (2017). "Visions of the Virgin Mary: An Ethnographic Study." Journal of Ethnographic Studies, 23(2), 147-162.

   • This ethnographic study explores the experiences of individuals who report visions of the Virgin Mary and examines their cultural significance in various communities.

These resources provide a solid foundation for understanding the phenomena surrounding sightings of the Virgin Mary and similar religious experiences across different cultures.

QUESTION: Why do Christians ignore that the New Testament's claims about the Messiah contradict the Hebrew Bible they claim is their unchanging foundation?

ANSWER: This is a very deep and important question that reveals the contradictions in the New Testament's theology. Once we began focusing solely on the Hebrew Torah and TaNaKh, it became painfully clear how many commandments we had been breaking while living under the influence of the New Testament. The realization was so sobering that we took a six-month break from all social media and YouTube to dedicate ourselves fully to study.

As we read what the God of Israel established as unchanging commandments that no one has the authority to add to or take away from, the entire landscape shifted for us. Coming from deep Christian roots and having been involved for years, we tried to use every New Testament lens we had to validate its claims. But time and again, those efforts failed in the face of the unshakable, eternal commands of the God of Israel.

Being former Christians, we know by experience and recognize that most New Testament followers have never truly understood the foundation they claim to stand on. If they did, they wouldn’t live in contradiction to the Creator—the God of Israel, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

Many are drawn to the New Testament because they’ve been taught to revere the Torah as mere history, while being told to follow a Messiah who, through human sacrifice, is said to replace it—despite the God of Israel explicitly declaring that human sacrifice is an abomination (see Jeremiah 19:4-6, 32:35, 2 Kings 16:1-4, Ezekie 23:36-40, Deuteronom 18:9-12, Leviticus 18:21, 20:1-7, Psalm 106:34-41, Proverbs 6:16-19). This theology is incredibly popular because it removes all accountability.

This doctrine gives people permission to remain in disobedience, justifying their actions through a demigod figure who supposedly 'fulfilled everything' on their behalf. They've been conditioned to believe they’re inherently filthy, born sinners, and forever unworthy in the eyes of the Creator, unable to ever meet His standard on their own.

But contrary to popular belief, the Hebrew Bible never teaches this. The God of Israel never demanded perfection—He asked for loyalty. His desire has always been simple: that people choose to serve Him alone, without a mediator, and walk in the path He clearly outlined. It’s a direct, personal, and intimate relationship—not a theological threesome.

But the truth remains: the Torah was never abolished, never replaced, and never optional. It is the unchanging standard of the God of Israel and is for His people, and anything that contradicts it cannot stand. With that said, let’s start by defining the word "delusion":

Definition of Delusion (from psychological and general use):

• A false belief or judgment about external reality, held despite incontrovertible evidence or facts to the contrary, often as a result of deception or mental conditioning.

• In everyday use, a delusion can also refer to a persistent belief in something that is demonstrably untrue or inconsistent with observable facts or foundational texts.

Now applying this to the context of Christianity and the Hebrew Bible:

Christians and New Testament followers claim that the Hebrew Torah is the unchanging foundation of their faith, but many of their New Testament doctrines conflict with this very foundation. Here's how this leads to what can be argued as delusional thinking:

1. Messiah Expectations Don’t Align

• Hebrew Bible: The promised Messiah (e.g. Isaiah 11, Micah 5) is a human, non-divine king from David’s line/seed who will rule, bring world peace, and restore Israel’s sovereignty, not Christians or New Testament followers.

• New Testament: Presents Jesus, Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA as a divine figure who died, was resurrected, and will return later to fulfill those things.

• Delusion: Despite the undeniable differences, many Christians still claim that the New Testament messiah fulfilled all the messianic prophecies, even though every Hebrew prophecy about the true Messiah remains unfulfilled. Clinging to that belief in the face of clear contradiction isn’t just confusion—it fits the very definition of delusion.

2. Law (Torah) is Declared Eternal in Hebrew Scriptures

• Hebrew Bible (e.g. Psalm 19:7, 119:160, Deuteronomy 4:2, 12:32, Ecclesiastes 3:14, Isaiah 40:8): Says the Torah is eternal, unchanging, and must be followed forever. The Torah is described as perfect, needing nothing added or subtracted.

• New Testament (e.g. Romans 6:14, Hebrews 8:13): Teaches that believers are no longer under the law and that the old covenant is obsolete.

• Delusion: Christians and New Testament followers claim to follow the Hebrew Bible but reject the core requirement of Torah obedience. This internal contradiction—holding two opposing beliefs—again reflects a kind of cognitive dissonance consistent with delusion.

3. Concept of God Changes

• Hebrew Bible: YaHuWaH is one, not in multiple persons (e.g., Deuteronomy 4:35, 6:4, 32:39, Malachi 3:6, Isaiah 44:24, 45:18, Proverbs 16:4).

• New Testament: Introduces the Trinity—Father, Son (Jesus), and Holy Spirit—as one God in three persons, despite the New Testament teaching not to serve two masters (Matthew 6:24, Luke 16:13, 1 Corinthians 10:21).

• Delusion: Claiming the Hebrew Bible supports the Trinity, despite its strong monotheistic stance, shows a denial of textual reality.

🔎 A Deeper Reflection:

These New Testament verses about serving only one master ironically raise a contradiction:
Most New Testament followers unknowingly claim to serve two or even three masters— the Father (God/YaHuWaH) and the Son (Jesus, Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA, etc.) and or a holy spirit — often treating the Son as equal, or even greater, than the Father. This directly clashes with:

• Torah, which teaches serving YaHuWaH alone (Exodus 20:3, Deut. 6:4–5).

• The Messiah figure in the NT, who is portrayed as a mediator, sacrifice, and intercessor — roles that shift the focus away from direct service to the Creator and God of Israel YaHuWaH.

So, even within their own text, the warning against divided service can be used to question the theological structure of the New Testament.

4. Lineage Claims vs. Virgin Birth

• Messiah’s Lineage: Hebrew prophecy requires a bloodline from the seed/semen of David through Solomon (2 Samuel 7:12–16, 1 Chronicles 17:11).

• New Testament: Claims Jesus, Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA, etc., was born from the sexual union of a holy spirit and a mortal, without Joseph’s biological input, but still insists he fulfills Davidic lineage through Joseph.

• Delusion: This contradiction is dismissed or explained away by most Christians and New Testament followers rather than confronted directly, aligning with the definition of delusion—maintaining a belief despite the facts, evidence, and what the God of Israel commands as unchanging.

In Summary:

Many Christians and New Testament followers are unaware or ignore how the New Testament’s claims directly conflict with the Hebrew Bible, and yet continue to claim that the Hebrew Bible validates Jesus, Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA, etc. This refusal to reconcile contradictions and to hold on to conflicting beliefs is consistent with the definition of delusion—a false belief held in the face of clear, contradicting evidence.

Why is living under a delusion harmful?

Living under this kind of delusional belief system—where one holds tightly to contradictory ideas while denying or ignoring the original source—can be harmful in several ways, both spiritually and socially. Here's how:

1. Spiritual Deception: Believing in a False Narrative

• If someone believes that their salvation or right standing with the Creator depends on a man-made or distorted interpretation, they may be worshipping in vain (see Isaiah 29:13).

• Claiming to follow the God of Israel (YaHuWaH) while rejecting His Torah and redefining His identity (as done in the Trinity or by elevating any deified savior as God this is idolatry according to the God of Israel, Exodus 20:1-8 (see NO Other Gods - Including the New Testament Messiah🕊️).

• This false narrative keeps people from seeking the true Creator on His terms, and instead, they follow traditions that nullify the commandments of YaHuWaH (Mark 7:7–9, ironically quoted by the Christian New Testament messiah himself).

2. Mental and Emotional Dependency

• Delusion fosters dependency on emotional experiences rather than facts. Many Christians and New Testament followers rely on feelings, worship music, or dramatic testimonies or experiences as proof that they have the "truth" all while ignoring the unchanging textual contradictions (see God’s Plan Not Mine 📖).

• This can create a false sense of security. People may believe they are saved or blessed because they said a prayer “in the name of Jesus, Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA, etc.,” without aligning their life with the Torah.

3. Moral and Ethical Confusion

• Without the God of Israel’s unchanging Torah as the clear foundation, morality becomes subjective and up to personal interpretation. For example, there are over 200 New Testament denominations in the United States alone, with a staggering 45,000 worldwide. This stark reality serves as clear evidence that the New Testament can be shaped into whatever one can persuade people to believe. This is also why many modern churches and various Hebrew groups accept practices the Torah condemns—like homosexuality, gender fluidity, idol worship by way of praying and worshiping through a demigod messiah, or even lawlessness—because they’ve either abandoned or never have taken time to slow down and study the unchanging standard of the Hebrew Torah.

• This confusion opens the door to justifying a lifestyle of sin, redefining good and evil, and distorting justice, just like in Isaiah 5:20.

4. Cultural and Historical Erasure

• Belief in a New Testament Messiah who contradicts Hebrew Scripture often leads to appropriation and erasure of the identity of Israel.

• The Church claims to replace Israel as “spiritual Israel,” ignoring the covenantal identity of the actual descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, many of whom are melanated people scattered worldwide.

• This delusion helps perpetuate false narratives of supremacy and replacement theology, which historically fueled colonization and slavery.

5. Obedience is Undermined

• A delusional belief that “faith or belief alone” saves means obedience is often called "legalism" or "bondage."

• This makes people resist discipline, accountability, and reject the Torah, and believe that grace excuses lawlessness.

• But the Torah says:

  “He that turns away his ear from hearing the Torah, even his prayer is an abomination.” (Proverbs 28:9)

• Simply put: If someone turns away from listening to the law (YaHuWaH's commandments) and disregards it, their prayers are detestable. Essentially, it emphasizes that disobedience to YaHuWaH's instructions leads to a disconnect in one's relationship with Him, making even their prayers ineffective.

Conclusion:

Living under this delusion isn’t just incorrect—it’s dangerous. It distances people from the true mighty one, YaHuWaH, causes confusion, and justifies disobedience under the illusion of righteousness. This is why it’s crucial to measure any doctrine against the unchanging commandments of the God of Israel, as outlined in the Hebrew Torah, rather than relying on later writings or self-proclaimed mentors, life coaches, or social media influencers with large followings whose teachings clearly contradict those commandments.

There are several well-documented historical events and scholarly studies that demonstrate how Christian delusion (believing in New Testament claims that contradict the Hebrew Bible) has led to widespread harm, spiritually, socially, and politically. To view those resources, consider becoming a member, which gives access to all our researched content.

QUESTION: I tried sharing the true name of the Creator—the God of Israel—with a New Testament believer, but he mocked me and said he only recognizes Yeshua, claiming his name was given the utmost status above all names. What does the Torah actually say about honoring names, and how does it address this kind of mindset?

ANSWER: Another great question, you're touching on a significant theological tension between the New Testament and the Hebrew TaNaKh. In Hebrew culture, names are deeply significant—they're not just labels but carry meaning, identity, and lineage. Unlike in most Western traditions, where names are often chosen for aesthetics or trends, Hebrew names reflect a person's purpose, family history, or relationship with YaHuWaH. For example, the name "Ya’AQuWB" (Jacob) means "heel-catcher" or "supplanter," pointing to his birth and destiny, “YiSRAL” means “he who struggles with AL (the all mighty one) marking a covenant identity, and YaRaMiYaHuW (Jeremiah) means “whom YaHuWaH has appointed”.

Every Hebrew name carries weight, rooted in meaning, identity, and purpose. Even the Latinized name “Jesus” (in English Joshua) tells a story—but not one rooted in Hebrew culture. In Hebrew, it holds no meaning, no lineage, no covenant. It’s a name disconnected from the original identity and mission of the true coming Messiah. It is a transliteration that evolved over centuries. Hebrew names matter in the culture of the Israelites. In Latin, the name "Jesus" comes from the Greek Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous), which itself was a Hellenized version of a Hebrew name. However, “Jesus” in Latin does not have a meaning—it is simply a phonetic adaptation. The Latin "Iesus" was later Anglicized to “Jesus”, but by this point, the meaning from the original Hebrew name YaHuWShuWA (YaHuWaH is salvation) had been completely stripped away.

When the Hebrew Scriptures were translated into Greek (Septuagint), the original Hebrew name YaHuWShuWA (like the son of Nun of the tribe of Ephraim) was Hellenized to Iēsous. Why? Because Greek has no "Y" or "H" sound, and it also doesn’t end masculine names with an "a."
So they changed:

• YaHuW → Ie

• ShuWA→ sous

Thus, YaHuWShuWA became Iēsous, a Greek approximation with no connection to the Hebrew culture. Yeshua, a Hebrew/Aramaic shortened form of YaHuWShuWA, meaning “He saves,” was another later form. Yeshua is a legitimate Hebrew form, but a shortened, less specific version. Here's an in-depth look at the issue, based on key scriptures from both the New Testament and the Hebrew Bible:

New Testament Claim: Jesus' Name Above All Names

In the New Testament, there are several verses that state Jesus' (Yeshua's) name is above all others:

🔹 Philippians 2:9-11

"Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the name which is above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth, and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father."

This passage asserts that Jesus’ name is above all others and that ultimately, all beings will bow to Him and confess Him as Lord. This is one of the key texts where Christian theology places Jesus at the highest level of authority, above all other names or powers.

Hebrew Bible (TaNaKh) on the Name of God (YaHuWaH)

In contrast, the Hebrew Bible consistently emphasizes that YaHuWaH (the God of Israel) is the one and only true God, His name is to be praised alone, and no one else should share in His glory or receive worship in His place. This is particularly clear in the concept of God's jealousy, where He does not tolerate the worship of other gods or the sharing of His honor.

🔹 Exodus 34:14

"For you shall worship no other god, for YaHuWaH, whose name (character) is Jealous, is a jealous God."

This verse is one of several that reveal YaHuWaH as a jealous Mighty One, meaning He does not share His glory, honor, or worship with anyone else. In Hebrew, words carry layered meanings and must be understood in proper context to grasp their depth. This verse isn't saying that YaHuWaH’s literal name is “Jealous,” but rather that jealousy is a defining aspect of His character, because His love is exclusive, protective, and righteous. His jealousy isn’t about human emotions but about maintaining His unique and rightful place as the sole object of worship. See H8034 ShaM/SheM (as a mark or memorial of individuality; by implication or honor, authority, character, fame, renown, and report).

🔹 Isaiah 42:8

“I am YaHuWaH, that is My name; and My glory I will not give to another, nor My praise to carved images.”

This verse reinforces the idea that YaHuWaH will not share His glory with anyone or anything else. His name is sacred, and He alone is worthy of praise for His mighty works.

🔹 Isaiah 48:11

“For My own sake, for My own sake, I will do it; for how should My name be profaned? And I will not give My glory to another.”

Again, YaHuWaH asserts that He alone will receive glory, and His name will not be profaned by any other entity or individual.

🔹 Zephaniah 3:9

“For then I will turn to the peoples a pure language, that they may all call upon the name of YaHuWaH, to serve Him with one consent.”

Call upon the name of YaHuWaH” – This is not generic theism. It’s specific: YaHuWaH, the Elohim of Israel.“With one consent” / “one accord” – This points to global unity, shared purpose, and restoration of truth in worship.

🔗 Related Verses:

• Isaiah 66:23 – “All flesh shall come to worship before Me, says YaHuWaH.”

• Zechariah 8:23 – “Ten men from every nation... will grab the garment of a YaHuWDiY (Jew) saying, ‘Let us go with you, for we have heard that Elohim is with you.’”

🧠 Big Idea:

This prophecy in Zephaniah reveals that in the Messianic future, all people—across languages, cultures, and former beliefs—will:

• Call on YaHuWaH by Name, not a substitute,

• Serve Him together, not divided by doctrines,

• And restore pure worship rooted in truth and unity.

Contradiction and Explanation

Here’s where the tension lies:

1. The New Testament asserts that their messiah’s name is above all names, and that ultimately, all beings must bow to Him. This would seem to give Jesus, Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA, etc., a position of honor and praise equal to or greater than the God of Israel.

2. The Hebrew Bible, on the other hand, states that YaHuWaH’s name is the only one that deserves glory and praise, and that no one else—whether a human being, a deity, or even an angel—should share in that praise. YaHuWaH is jealous for His name, and He will not give His glory to anyone else.

This creates a theological contradiction if Jesus is considered both equal to and worthy of the same glory as YaHuWaH, because YaHuWaH explicitly says that He will not share His glory with another. According to the Hebrew Bible, no one else—not even a messiah figure—should receive glory that rightfully belongs to God alone.

Christian and Hebrew Perspectives:

• Christian Explanation: In Christian theology and New Testament belief, the messiah is viewed as God incarnate, and thus, he shares in the glory of the Father. Christians believe that the messiah is one with the Father; he is worthy of the same honor and praise. This view often references passages such as John 10:30 ("I and the Father are one") and Colossians 2:9 ("For in Him all the fullness of Deity dwells in bodily form").

• The God of Israel’s Perspective: In contrast, the Hebrew Bible maintains that YaHuWaH is the one and only God and will not share His glory with anyone, including any messianic demigod or a divine savior figure. The God of Israel has always been seen as the one true God, and the coming messiah is described as being a non-divine human and servant of YaHuWaH, who is anointed to fulfill a specific purpose.

Conclusion:

The claim that the New Testament messiah’s name is above all names directly contradicts the Hebrew Torah’s teaching that YaHuWaH’s name is the only one worthy of glory and praise, as well as the idea that God’s glory will not be shared with another. This theological inconsistency is a key point of tension between Christianity and Judaism. Christianity, by equating Jesus, Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA with God, places Him in a position of ultimate authority that Judaism reserves for YaHuWaH alone.

QUESTION: Many New Testament followers swear their Messiah was a real historical figure. Are there any hard facts or archaeological findings that independently prove this individual existed?

ANSWER: You've raised a deep and important point—while many assert that the New Testament Messiah was a real historical figure, much of the evidence cited in support of this claim originates from within the New Testament itself or from sources influenced by Christian tradition. This stands in contrast to the God of Israel, YHWH, whose name and interactions with the Hebrew people are documented by various ancient nations and cultures outside of Israel’s own writings. Let's take a look a what the research tells us.

1. Evidence for Jesus Outside the New Testament

There are a few non-New Testament sources that mention Yeshua, but it's crucial to assess them critically for authenticity, reliability, and how close they are to Yeshua's lifetime.

a. Roman Sources

• Tacitus (c. 56–120 CE):
  In Annals (Book 15, Chapter 44), he mentions:

  “Christus, from whom the name [Christian] had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of... Pontius Pilatus…”

  • This is written about 80+ years after the supposed crucifixion.

  • Tacitus was not a fan of Christians, which lends some weight to his objectivity.

  • However, he likely got his information from Christians themselves, not from direct Roman records.

b. Jewish Sources

• Josephus (37–100 CE):
  Two passages in Antiquities of the Jews mention Iēsous, especially the "Testimonium Flavianum" (Book 18, Chapter 3). The version we have says:

  “Now there was about this time Iēsous, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man…”

  • However, most scholars agree that parts of this text were tampered with by Christian scribes.

  • A more likely, stripped-down version might only say Iēsous was a teacher and was crucified, but even this is debated.

🧠 Wider Historical Context: Many jews Had Already Been Hellenized

• Many Jews in Judea and especially the Diaspora (Alexandria, Asia Minor, Rome) had been Hellenized (adopted Greek language, customs, and names).

• Pagan Roman culture heavily influenced daily life.

• Torah observance declined among elites, though it remained strong among Pharisees and Essenes.

Josephus, born YuWSaPh Ban MaTaTiYaHuW in Jerusalem to a priestly family of the tribe of Levi, was deeply rooted in Hebrew culture and lineage. He knew the meaning and cultural weight of Hebrew names. He was also educated in Torah, Pharisaic law, and had firsthand knowledge of the Hebrew TaNaKh. The TaNaKh (Torah, Nevi'im, and Ketuvim)—what Christians later called the "Old Testament" and believe it to be done away with—was already compiled, preserved, and widely used among Hebrews and Jews before and during the time of Josephus (ca. 37–100 CE). However, he was captured during the Jewish-Roman War (66–70 CE), surrendered to the Romans, and aligned himself with the Flavian emperors.

• He then took on the name Flavius Josephus, a sign of Roman patronage—essentially becoming a Roman citizen under their rule.

• From then on, he served as a cultural and political bridge between the Hebrews, Jews, and Romans. He began writing under Roman influence and chose political safety and accessibility over cultural purity. His use of Greek names like “Iēsous” reflects a broader Hellenized world where many Jews were disconnected from their ancient roots, likely shaping both his writings and the Roman-Christian reinterpretation of Jewish figures like the Messiah.

📘 Example from Josephus:

In Antiquities of the Jews (Book 18.3.3), the Testimonium Flavianum (a contested passage) reads in Greek:

“... Ἰησοῦς ὁ λεγόμενος Χριστός ...”
("... Iēsous who is called Christ ...")

Notice Josephus wrote Iēsous, not “Yeshua” or "Jesus."

Judah under Roman rule

Under Roman rule, Judah (later known as Judea) experienced a complex and often tense relationship with Roman authorities concerning lifestyle practices. While the Romans were generally pragmatic about religion and often tolerant of local customs to maintain peace, they also had specific expectations and controls. Here are the key guidelines and policies Rome implemented in Judea regarding worship and religious expression

• Rome closely monitored and suppressed any group or individual claiming to be a “messiah” or king, as this was seen as a political threat.

• Many Jewish uprisings (e.g., Theudas, Judas of Galilee, the Zealots, and later Bar Kokhba) were met with brutal Roman crackdowns.

• Much like the United States, Rome generally allowed conquered peoples to continue worshiping their own gods, including the God of Israel (YaHuWaH), as long as it did not interfere with imperial order.

• Worship of the Roman Emperor as a god (the "Imperial Cult") was a widespread practice across the empire.

• However, Jews were exempted from participating in emperor worship because of their strict monotheism.

• Jews were expected to offer sacrifices and prayers for the emperor's well-being (not to the emperor himself), which Rome accepted as a gesture of loyalty.

• Romans discouraged the building of new temples or shrines without imperial permission, especially those that could attract political attention or challenge Roman authority.

• Roman authorities, especially under figures like Herod the Great and the Roman governors (e.g., Pontius Pilate), exerted control over the appointment of the High Priest, often replacing them for political reasons.

• This politicized the priesthood and caused significant unrest among Torah-following Jews.

• Roman officials, especially early on, avoided placing images or idols in the Jewish Temple to avoid provoking rebellion. Even Rome knew that placing images and or idols in the similitude of any figure in the Jewish Temple could cause rebellion (Deuteronomy 4:16).

• Jews were required to pay the Temple tax (didrachma), which supported worship in the Jerusalem Temple.

• After the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE, Rome redirected this tax to the Temple of Jupiter in Rome (Fiscus Judaicus), a significant insult to Jewish identity and worship.

c. Pliny the Younger (c. 112 CE):

• In a letter to Emperor Trajan, he mentions that Christians worship Christ “as to a god.”

• This is indirect and from Christian practice, not a direct historical account of Jesus' life.

2. The God of Israel (YaHuWaH) in Historical Records

In contrast, YaHuWaH is:

• Mentioned in inscriptions from other nations, including enemies.

• Attested in ancient documents like:

  • The Mesha Stele (Moabite Stone, 9th century BCE): Mentions the “House of David” and the Name YHWH.

  • Kuntillet Ajrud inscriptions: Ancient Hebrew inscriptions (8th century BCE) explicitly mention “YaHuWaH of Samaria” and “YaHuWaH of Teman.”

  • Assyrian and Babylonian records: Refer to the kings of Israel and Judah interacting with or worshipping their God YaHuWaH.

This makes the existence of YaHuWaH, the identity of Israel as a nation, and their historical timeline far more grounded in external archaeological and written historical sources, even from adversaries.

3. Conclusion

• Jesus: Most of the information about him comes from the New Testament itself. A few later Roman and Jewish writers mention him, but usually in brief and indirectly, often relying on what Christians said, not firsthand accounts.

• YaHuWaH: Unlike Yeshua, there are direct attestations of the name of Israel's God in ancient, external sources across different cultures and centuries.

🧩 Comparative Perspective: Jesus and YHWH

While Jesus's historical existence is supported by various non-Christian sources, the God of Israel, YHWH, is attested in ancient inscriptions and texts from neighboring cultures. Artifacts like the Mesha Stele and the Kuntillet Ajrud inscriptions mention YHWH, providing archaeological evidence of his worship in ancient Israel. This external corroboration offers a different dimension of historical validation compared to the textual references for Yeshua.​ Now let's delve into the archaeological evidence for the Israelite God, YaHuWaH (YHWH), found in ancient inscriptions.​

🏺 Archaeological Evidence for YAHUWaH (YHWH)

1. Mesha Stele (Moabite Stone) – c. 840 BCE

• Discovery: Found in 1868 at Dhiban, Jordan.

• Content: An inscription by King Mesha of Moab detailing his victories over Israel.

• Significance: Mentions the Israelite God YaHuWaH, providing the earliest known extra-biblical reference to YHWH. ​

2. Kuntillet Ajrud Inscriptions – c. 800 BCE

• Location: Sinai Peninsula.

• Findings: Inscriptions on storage jars referencing "YaHuWaH of Samaria and his Asherah" and "YaHuWaH of Teman and his Asherah."

• Interpretation: Suggests that YaHuWaH was worshipped in both Samaria and Teman, and possibly associated with a consort figure, Asherah. ​

3. Soleb Inscription – c. 1400 BCE

• Location: Soleb temple in modern-day Sudan.

• Content: An Egyptian inscription referring to the "Shasu of YaHuWaH," indicating a group of nomadic people associated with YaHuWaH.

• Significance: Represents the earliest known mention of YaHuWaH, suggesting that the deity was recognized outside of Israel. ​

SO WAS THIS PERSON REAL?

To approach the question of whether this person was a real historical person, we can use several data-driven, evidence-based, and scholarly methods. Let’s break this down by categories:

1. Historical Textual Analysis

This method examines ancient documents to determine reliability and authorship:

• Manuscript Evidence: Compare the number and dating of New Testament manuscripts to other ancient texts (e.g., Plato, Homer). The NT has thousands of manuscripts from the 2nd century onward. The NT has over 5,800 Greek manuscripts, plus thousands more in Latin and other languages. However, very few of these date from the 2nd century. Most of the earliest manuscripts we have are fragmentary and come from the late 2nd to 3rd centuries, with more complete manuscripts appearing in the 4th century and later.

So why are there so many manuscripts?

1. Christianity spread rapidly: As Christianity grew across the Roman Empire and beyond, there was a big demand for copies of the scriptures in local churches.

2. Manuscripts were hand-copied: Before the printing press, every copy was made by hand, which naturally led to variation over time.

3. The NT was widely translated early on: Into Latin, Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, etc., creating even more versions to compare.

4. Preservation efforts: Monasteries and churches often preserved texts, and the fact that the NT was considered sacred led to a strong effort to preserve and distribute it.

Why are there so many revisions or variants?

There are a few key reasons:

• Copying errors: Scribes made mistakes (misspellings, skipping lines, etc.).

• Intentional changes: Sometimes scribes “corrected” what they thought were mistakes or clarified confusing passages.

• Doctrinal influence: Some variants may have been made to support or combat specific theological views.

• Lack of standardized spelling or punctuation: Greek, in particular, had flexible spelling and no spaces between words, which caused interpretation issues.

Over the years, due to the vast variants, biblical scholars and textual critics have identified multiple passages in the New Testament that were later additions—they do not appear in the earliest and most reliable Greek manuscripts. These are often referred to as "ghost scriptures" or interpolations—passages that were inserted after the original texts were written.

Here are some of the most significant and well-documented examples:

📜 1. The Story of the Adulterous Woman – John 7:53–8:11

"Let him who is without sin cast the first stone."

• ✅ Not found in the earliest Greek manuscripts like Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus.

• ✅ Earliest Church Fathers (like Origen and Chrysostom) never mention it.

• ✅ Most scholars agree it was added at least a century later.

• ✅ May have been preserved as an oral tradition or inserted to soften Yeshua’s image.

📚 Source: Bruce Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament

✝️ 2. The Longer Ending of Mark – Mark 16:9–20

Resurrection appearances and signs, like drinking poison.

• ✅ Missing from the earliest manuscripts (e.g., Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus).

• ✅ Style and vocabulary differ from the rest of Mark’s Gospel.

• ✅ Many Bibles now bracket or footnote these verses.

📚 Source: Bart Ehrman, Misquoting Jesus

🔁 3. The Trinitarian Formula – 1 John 5:7–8 (Comma Johanneum)

"For there are three that bear record in heaven..."

• ✅ Only appears in late Latin manuscripts—not in early Greek texts.

• ✅ Added during theological debates over the Trinity, likely in the 4th century.

• ✅ Most modern Bibles exclude this or place it in footnotes.

📚 Source: Raymond Brown, The Epistles of John

✋ 4. Jesus’ Sweat Like Drops of Blood – Luke 22:43–44

“His sweat became like great drops of blood…”

• ✅ Absent in many early manuscripts.

• ✅ Possibly added to emphasize Jesus’ physical agony.

📚 Source: Bruce Metzger

🔥 5. “Father, Forgive Them...” – Luke 23:34

“Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.”

• ✅ Missing in early manuscripts like Papyrus 75.

• ✅ Possibly added to reflect Christian forgiveness themes.

🕊️ 6. The Angel Stirring the Water – John 5:3b–4

An angel stirred the water at the pool of Bethesda.

• ✅ Not found in early manuscripts.

• ✅ Likely added to explain the following verse about healing.

⚖️ Why This Matters

These ghost scriptures are not mere typos—they shape theology, morality, and doctrine. Many are used in sermons, theology debates, or even laws and social ethics, despite being later additions.

• The story of the adulterous woman is often cited to preach grace over judgment.

• The Comma Johanneum was used to defend the Trinity, a major Torah issue.

• The longer ending of Mark includes miraculous signs and snake-handling claims, influencing certain denominations.

📚 Further Reading and Scholarly Sources

• Misquoting Jesus – Bart D. Ehrman

• The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration – Bruce Metzger

• Jesus, Interrupted – Bart D. Ehrman

• The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture – Bart D. Ehrman

• Criteria of Authenticity used by historians:

  • Multiple Attestation: Is Yeshua mentioned in several independent sources (e.g., Josephus, Tacitus, Paul)?

  • Embarrassment: Events unlikely to be fabricated (e.g., Yeshua’s crucifixion—Romans used this for criminals).

  • Dissimilarity: Sayings of Yeshua that differ from Hebrew, Jewish, or early Christian traditions.

2. Archaeology

While no direct archaeological evidence of this person (e.g., inscriptions or items bearing his name) has been found, archaeology supports:

• Existence of Nazareth (once disputed),

• Authenticity of places mentioned in the Gospels,

• Practices and customs consistent with 1st-century Judea.

However, unlike YHWH, whose name appears in inscriptions (like the Mesha Stele, Kuntillet Ajrud, and Soleb), this New Testament messiah has no known inscription from the 1st century CE bearing his name.

3. Comparison with Mythology

Scholars have found vast parallels to this Messiah with mythological figures to test if the Yeshua narrative is unique or derivative:

• Not Unique to Christianity: The narrative and traits of the New Testament messiah bear striking similarities to longstanding mythological motifs, particularly the theme of dying and rising gods such as Osiris, Dionysus, and many others that predate the Christian era. These parallels have led many scholars and researchers to question whether the figure of Yeshua was a historical individual or a constructed mythological persona attributed with supernatural attributes already familiar in Greco-Roman traditions. Given the cultural and religious environment of the time—heavily influenced by Roman and Hellenistic ideologies—it is plausible that those in power integrated existing mythological frameworks into the emerging Christian narrative to ascribe divinity and universal appeal to this messianic figure.

• Counterpoint: Some historians reject this theory; they argue that Yeshua's (Jesus') crucifixion under the Roman governor Pontius Pilate—a verifiable, datable event in history—confirms his existence and, by extension, validates the miraculous claims associated with him.

  However, this line of reasoning is fundamentally flawed. A historical context does not verify supernatural claims. Knowing that someone lived—or even died publicly—does not automatically authenticate the legends that surround them. To illustrate this point:
  We know with certainty that George Washington was a real historical figure and the first president of the United States. His death is well-documented, yet this does not prove the famous cherry tree story ("I cannot tell a lie..."), which many historians agree was a fabricated moral tale popularized decades after his death to promote civic virtue.

  Similarly, while Yeshua may have been crucified under Roman authority, this does not validate the miraculous elements of the New Testament narratives, such as walking on water, raising the dead, or ascending into heaven. These events are theological in nature, not historical facts. In short, verifiable historical details can anchor a narrative in time, but they do not authenticate the mythic or miraculous elements woven around that figure. Recognizing this helps us approach religious texts with a clear distinction between historical context and theological embellishment.

4. Analysis of Early Christian Writings

• Paul’s Epistles: Written between 50–60 CE, only ~20 years after Jesus's death. Paul claims to have met Yeshua’s brother James and Peter.

• Creedal statements (e.g., 1 Corinthians 15:3–7) are considered extremely early (possibly from within 3–5 years of Yeshua’s death).

5. Sociological & Cultural Analysis

• Rapid spread of Christianity, especially in hostile environments, suggests a real catalyst figure, often thought to be a historical Yeshua.

• Martyrdom of early followers: Strong evidence that they sincerely believed in a real person/events.

6. Historical Silence

• Absence of mentions in certain Roman records (like official Roman crucifixion lists) leads some to question his existence.

• However, the lack of record is not surprising, since the crucifixion of poor Jewish preachers wasn’t unusual or newsworthy in Roman records.

7. Digital Humanities & Forensic Linguistics (Modern Tools)

• Textual stylometry can distinguish authors (used on the Gospels and Paul’s letters).

• Mapping early manuscript transmission and geography shows how early the Yeshua tradition spread.

Conclusion

Most critical historians (even skeptical or non-Christian ones) agree:

• Yeshua likely existed as a 1st-century Jewish teacher,

• Was baptized by John,

• Crucified by Romans under Pontius Pilate.

What’s debated is not whether he existed, but who he was: just a teacher, a revolutionary, or divine?

the 1,200-year-old debate

The debate over whether Yeshua of Nazareth was a real historical figure has been ongoing for nearly two centuries, though questions about his identity, divinity, and role emerged even in the earliest centuries of the Christian era. We believe there probably was a person who existed and was a Jew who shared Torah, like many others did during that time. Remember, the Romans conquered the region of Judea (the land of the Jews) in 63 BCE under General Pompey. So by that time, the people of Israel had been following the Torah for well over 1,000 years—from at least 1300–1400 BCE to 63 BCE. That’s over 1,200 years of Torah-based national lifestyle before the Romans took control.

The Torah wasn’t just a book of divine laws by YaHuWaH—it defined Israel’s identity, social justice system, calendar, family structure, purity laws, priesthood, national history, and relationship to their land and YaHuWaH. Despite the pressures of foreign domination—first under Greek rule (333–164 BCE) and later Roman rule (from 63 BCE onward)—many Hebrews and Jews remained deeply devoted to the Torah. This unwavering commitment gave rise to distinct groups such as the Pharisees, Essenes, and Zealots, who sought to protect the sanctity of the Torah and resist external cultural and religious pagan influence.

This enduring loyalty is precisely why many rejected this New Testament messiah figure (Deuteronomy 4:16 and 13:1-11). It is frequently asserted that this individual's purpose was to be born and ultimately die as a human sacrifice to "fulfill" the Torah. However, the Torah repeatedly and clearly condemns human sacrifice as an abomination (Jeremiah 19:4–6 and 32:35, 2 Kings 16:1–4, Ezekiel 23:36–40, Deuteronomy 18:9–12, Leviticus 18:21 and 20:1–7, and Psalm 106:34–41). Furthermore, if the Torah is already perfect, as declared by the God of Israel, then perfection requires no fulfillment, completion, or correction.

The accounts of his existence and actions, as recorded by his followers in the New Testament, stand in direct conflict with what the God of Israel had already declared to be perfect, complete, and immutable: the Torah. From the perspective of the Hebrews and Jews, the Torah represents the divine law—sacred and sufficient—requiring neither addition nor alteration, as YaHuWaH emphasized in Deuteronomy 4:2, 12:32, and Proverbs 30:5–6.

History repeats itself

There is a high probability that this person existed, but over time, he was reinterpreted by followers. History is full of individuals who rose up against established systems, gathered passionate followers, and were believed by many to be divinely inspired or sent for a greater purpose. Joan of Arc (A divinely guided martyr; later canonized as a saint), Nat Turner (A prophet to some; a terrorist to others), Malcolm X (A truth-speaker and revolutionary; later, a bridge-builder), and Martin Luther King Jr. (A moral leader and martyr; a threat to the status quo by some) just to name a few were all been elevated.

📖 A Pattern That Repeats:

Throughout history, these individuals:

• Emerged in times of social, religious, or political unrest.

• Spoke boldly against oppression, corruption, or tradition.

• Attracted mass followers who believed their mission was divinely appointed.

• Faced resistance, persecution, or death from the very systems they challenged.

• They were often later praised—sometimes only after their deaths.

🔄 Why It Will Continue:

This pattern will continue because:

• In every generation, people seek justice, freedom, and meaning.

• Oppressive systems create a vacuum for charismatic voices of hope and challenge.

• Humans often look for "chosen ones" or messianic figures to lead them out of chaos.

• The belief in divine calling remains deeply ingrained in many cultures and religions.

🌀 The Power of Narrative: How Urban Legends Become “Truth” Over Time

Throughout human history, narratives—true or not—have shaped cultures, belief systems, and even entire civilizations. People pass down stories through generations, and as they are told and retold, they evolve, becoming more refined, dramatic, and emotionally resonant. Over time, these stories can transition from simple accounts to “urban legends”—widely believed tales that may lack concrete evidence but are accepted as truth by the masses.

These narratives often gain momentum because they serve a deeper emotional, psychological, or cultural need. They answer questions about identity, suffering, salvation, or purpose. They become embedded in collective memory and function as historical anchors, regardless of their factual accuracy. Most families have those legendary stories—the kind that blur the line between fact and folklore. In mine, there’s one about my great-grandfather knocking out a bull after it bucked him. Sounds unbelievable, but it’s been told for generations.

🔍 The Case of the New Testament Messiah

The story of Yeshua of Nazareth—whether viewed as historical fact, religious truth, or mythologized legend—shares many hallmarks of narrative elevation:

• Multiple authors wrote about him decades after his supposed death, often with theological motives, not historical objectivity.

• The Gospels offer divergent accounts, indicating that the narrative of Jesus was adapted and reinterpreted to suit different audiences and theological aims. These variations have led many scholars to conclude that the Gospel writers were not composing modern historical biographies, but rather crafting theological narratives shaped by the needs and beliefs of their communities. The differences between Matthew, Mark, and Luke strongly imply that the Gospels were not written simultaneously or collaboratively, but instead developed independently over time by distinct authors, each drawing from unique sources and guided by specific religious perspectives. Their writing styles and agendas vary so significantly that it is widely accepted they were not working in unison—this was not a coordinated effort, but rather individual accounts molded by context and intention. Notably, none of the Synoptic Gospel authors identify themselves as eyewitnesses, and the names traditionally ascribed to them—Matthew, Mark, and Luke—were only attached to these texts centuries later.

• His life and death were imbued with elements found in earlier myths (e.g., dying and rising gods like Osiris, Mithras, and Dionysus). There are several deities and legendary figures like Asclepius, Krishna, Zoroaster / Zarathustra, etc., before Yeshua who were said to perform miracles. In most of these traditions, miracle stories were told as part of religious mythologies, not in historically anchored biographies. In the case of Yeshua, the claims of miracles are linked to narrative texts in the New Testament—particularly the Gospels—which are written in an eyewitness style and seek to portray him as a real, historical figure.

• Over time, miracles, divine titles, and dramatic events (like the virgin birth and resurrection) were emphasized to elevate his status, appealing to Roman, Greek, and converted Jews.

• Oral tradition played a massive role in spreading and amplifying the narrative before anything was written down.

These compounded elements helped to create a figure whose story became grander, more supernatural, and more universal as time went on. It is very possible, just as with other urban legends, that elements of his story were exaggerated, constructed, or mythologized, not from malice, but from human tendencies to add meaning and wonder to significant lives.

📜 Urban Legends Become “Urban Facts”

The same phenomenon has occurred with countless other figures:

• Stories of King Arthur, who may have been a real war leader, evolved into sword-in-the-stone magic.

• George Washington and the cherry tree—never proven, but symbolically powerful.

• Tales of miraculous saints, visionaries, and heroes—many based on kernels of truth but grown into full epics.

These examples show that once a story serves a cultural or religious function, it often escapes scrutiny and enters the realm of “accepted truth,” even without hard evidence.

🧠 Conclusion: A Narrative-Driven Legacy

In the case of Yeshua, his story—whether historical or not—was shaped by faith, mythology, cultural context, and power dynamics. Over time, the narrative may have taken precedence over fact, leading to a widespread belief rooted not in confirmed history but in the emotional and spiritual weight of the story itself. And just as history has shown us with other legendary figures, this phenomenon is not unique, nor is it unlikely. Humans are storytellers—and sometimes, the story becomes more real than the truth ever was.

WHAT DOES THE GOD OF ISRAEL THINK?

As we’ve seen, countless opinions surround the New Testament messiah. Yet a crucial question often goes unasked: What is the perspective of the God of Israel—and does His view matter to you? According to the Hebrew Torah, the God of Israel has already identified His firstborn and anointed son as the nation of Israel itself, not a single individual. This foundational truth renders debates over the historical existence of Jesus (aka Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, or YaHuWShuWA, etc.) irrelevant within the original Hebrew worldview. The concept of divine sonship in the Torah is not assigned to a person, but to a people—a collective body chosen, QaDuWSh (set apart), sanctified, and covenanted by YaHuWaH.

This distinction is deeply rooted in the Hebrew Torah and reflects a worldview fundamentally different from later New Testament doctrines, which center divine sonship around a single messianic idol figure. While this perspective may be unpopular or overlooked in mainstream theology, it underscores a critical divergence between the Hebrew understanding of covenantal identity and the theological constructs introduced in the New Testament.

1. The God of Israel Calls Israel His Son

This concept is explicitly stated in multiple passages:

• Exodus 4:22-23

  “Thus says YaHuWaH, Israel is My son, even My firstborn... Let My son go, that he may serve Me.”

• Hosea 11:1

  “When Israel was a child, then I loved him, and out of Egypt I called My son.”
  This verse is also cited in the New Testament in Matthew 2:15, and is attributed to Yeshua as being the God of Israel’s son. Yet in its original Hebrew context, YaHuWaH unmistakably refers to the nation of Israel, not a single individual. Take note that Yeshua was born approximately 700–720 years after the prophet Hosea. So, how could Matthew apply a prophecy intended for Israel as a people to a person born centuries later?

• Isaiah 41:8-9

  “But you, Israel, are My servant, Jacob whom I have chosen, the seed of Abraham My friend.”

• Jeremiah 31:9

  “...for I am a father to Israel, and Ephraim is My firstborn.”

These texts establish that “sonship” to YaHuWaH is national, not individual. Ephraim is both a tribe within Israel and a poetic/metaphoric name used to represent the entire northern kingdom of Israel. Israel (YaShaR’AL) refers to the entire nation descended from the 12 sons of Jacob (whose name was changed to Israel). Ephraim was one of Joseph's two sons, and Ephraim’s tribe became dominant among the northern tribes after the kingdom split (following Solomon’s reign). Because Ephraim was the leading tribe in the northern kingdom, prophets like Jeremiah often used “Ephraim” as a symbolic stand-in for the entire northern kingdom of Israel.

2. Anointed (MashiYach) Also Refers to Kings and the Nation

• The Hebrew word Mashiach (Messiah) simply means “anointed one.”

• Many figures were called anointed, and YaHuWaH used them for His purpose to aid Israel: David, Saul, Cyrus (a non-Hebrew Persian king), and even the high priests.

• The nation of Israel itself is sometimes treated as anointed and chosen to represent YaHuWaH.

3. Christian Doctrine Individualizes the “Son” Concept

• Christianity reinterprets the “Son of God” as referring specifically to one man, Yeshua, whom it claims is the unique begotten Son.

• This departs from the collective identity of “sonship” as it appears in the TaNaKh.

• Given Christianity's deep pagan roots in Greco-Roman culture, its reinterpretation of the term 'Son of God' as referring exclusively to a half-divine, half-human individual closely mirrors longstanding pagan narratives. This concept bears strong parallels to the Greco-Roman tradition of demigods—figures born of divine fathers and human mothers—a motif widely known throughout the Mediterranean world well before and during the composition of the New Testament.

4. Why It Matters

If we return to the Hebrew framework and the perspective of the God of Israel, the role of YaHuWaH’s “son” is:

• To be obedient,

• To reflect His righteousness to the nations,

• To walk in His commandments,

• To be a light to the nations (Isaiah 42:6, 49:6).

Therefore:

Regardless of whether Yeshua was a historical figure, from YaHuWaH's perspective, Israel—the people—are already recognized as His Son. This is precisely the reason the Hebrews and Jews rejected Yeshua, not out of animosity but in adherence to the first of the Ten Commandments given by the God of Israel, as stated in Exodus 20:3. Additionally, the Hebrew TaNaKh does not indicate that the coming Messiah would be born from a sexual union between a holy spirit and a mortal, nor does it prophesy that he would perform miracles and healings.

These traits alone disqualify Yeshua from being the true coming Messiah. It is important to note that these miraculous characteristics closely resemble those of earlier mythological Roman and Greek deities, which historical evidence suggests were heavily influenced during the Roman conquest of Judea. The character surrounding the Messiah figure is just another repacked pagan influenced demigod. The Hebrews and Jews demonstrated great courage and obedience, showing that people often remain steadfast when their long-established culture is threatened or challenged (see 🎬 Disney’s Snow White and the New Testament Messiah | WOTR When Change Backfires ✨).

1. What does it mean that the word of the God of Israel is unchanging?

ANSWER: The Hebrew Tanakh (Old Testament) affirms that the God of Israel does not change (Malachi 3:6). His laws, commandments, and statutes, as given in the Torah, remain the foundation of truth and righteousness. Unlike human traditions and evolving religious doctrines, His word is eternal (Psalm 119:89).

2. How does this contrast with religious interpretations and doctrines?

ANSWER: Over time, many religious sects, pastors, and teachers have introduced interpretations that deviate from the original Hebrew Scriptures. While religious institutions may alter teachings to fit societal norms, the Torah remains unaltered. The God of Israel warned against adding to or subtracting from His word (Deuteronomy 4:2).

3. If the Torah is unchanging, why do so many follow doctrines based on the New Testament?

ANSWER: Many religious traditions are rooted in the New Testament, which introduces theological shifts that differ from the Torah’s teachings. However, since the Hebrew Tanakh is universally recognized as the sacred and inspired word of the Creator, any doctrine that contradicts it must be examined critically. The God of Israel never indicated that His laws would be replaced, nullified, or fulfilled.

4. What does the God of Israel say about personal opinions and religious leaders?

ANSWER: The Tanakh warns against following human leaders who turn people away from the Torah. Jeremiah 17:5 states, "Cursed is the man who trusts in man and makes flesh his strength, whose heart departs from YaHuWaH." Instead, the people of Israel are instructed to seek wisdom from the Torah itself (Deuteronomy 30:10-14; Joshua 1:8). Why? Because it is unchanging.

5. Are there consequences for following doctrines that contradict the Torah?

ANSWER: Yes. The God of Israel repeatedly warns against forsaking His commandments in favor of human traditions. Deuteronomy 28 details blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience. Isaiah 8:20 states, "To the Torah and to the testimony! If they do not speak according to this word, it is because there is no light in them."

6. What should one do if they have been misled by religious traditions?

ANSWER: The Tanakh calls for returning to the Torah. Ezekiel 18:21-23 assures that if a person repents and follows the Creator’s laws, they will be restored. Seeking truth requires reading the Torah firsthand and aligning one's actions with it (Psalm 1:1-3).

7. What role does Israel play in preserving the unchanging word of the Creator?

ANSWER: Israel was chosen to be a "light to the nations" by upholding the Torah (Isaiah 42:6). The nation’s responsibility is to guard and teach the Creator’s instructions, not to adopt or conform to foreign religious doctrines and ways of worship(Deuteronomy 7:6-11).

8. How can one ensure they are following the true word of the Creator and not human traditions?

ANSWER: By studying the Torah diligently (Deuteronomy 6:6-9), seeking wisdom from the Tanakh, and avoiding teachings that contradict it. Psalm 119:105 declares, "Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path." The God of Israel’s truth is found in His unchanging word, not in human reinterpretations.

QUESTION: Do you have any other sources that show the New Testament or Jesus are false? I was talking to a Christian and he threw me off.

ANSWER: It’s completely natural to feel momentarily thrown off when faced with opposition—especially from those who have been deeply conditioned by Western Christian theology and can sound good quoting New Testament scriptures. The majority of Western culture either adheres to Christianity or supports Christian ideology in some form. Because of this, most people are raised within a mindset that accepts Jesus as the Messiah without ever critically examining the Hebrew Scriptures themselves. For those who have spent their entire lives immersed in this theology, being challenged to provide proof from the Hebrew Scriptures where the God of Israel declares a New Testament Messiah to receive glory and credit for His mighty works can be an overwhelming experience. Most Christians have been taught that the Hebrew TaNaKh, often referred to as the "Old Testament," was fulfilled, nullified, or replaced when the New Testament Messiah was said to have died on a cross.

The truth is, that these ideologies are never supported in the Hebrew Bible. Nowhere in the ToRaH, the Prophets, or the Writings does YaHuWaH ever state that He will transfer His glory to another or that a Messiah will receive worship, atonement authority, or divine status. All the chosen people and or prophets of YaHuWaH were never worshiped. He explicitly states the opposite:

• "I am YaHuWaH, that is My Name; My glory I will not give to another, nor My praise to graven images." (Isaiah 42:8)

• "You shall know that I, YaHuWaH, am your Savior and your Redeemer, the Mighty One of Jacob." (Isaiah 49:26)

• "Besides Me, there is no Savior." (Isaiah 43:11)

When confronted with these scriptures (and many, many more), Christians often struggle to reconcile them with their belief in a New Testament Messiah. For many, it can be intimidating, frustrating, and even humbling to realize that their doctrine lacks support from the very foundational scriptures they claim to follow and upon which Christianity is built (the Hebrew TaNaKh). This is why their response is often emotionally charged rather than scripturally sound. There are a few non-Christian, non-contemporary historical writers who mention Jesus, but their accounts are limited and often debated among scholars. Let's see what the data and research reveal.

1. Flavius Josephus (c. 37–100 CE) – A Jewish historian who wrote Antiquities of the Jews (c. 93 CE). He mentions Jesus twice, but one of these passages (the Testimonium Flavianum) has been questioned due to later Christian alterations. Flavius Josephus was born after the time when Jesus is believed to have lived (c. 4 BCE – 30 CE). This means Josephus was not an eyewitness to Jesus' life or death. Instead, his writings in Antiquities of the Jews (c. 93 CE) were based on secondhand sources or existing traditions about Jesus. His accounts help understand how Hebrews, Jews, and Romans perceived Jesus in the 1st century, but they do not serve as direct eyewitness testimony.

2. Tacitus (c. 56–120 CE) – A Roman historian who, in his Annals (c. 116 CE), refers to Christians and "Christus," who was executed under Pontius Pilate. Tacitus was not a Christian and wrote critically of Christians.

3. Pliny the Younger (c. 61–113 CE) – A Roman governor who wrote a letter to Emperor Trajan (c. 112 CE) discussing how to deal with Christians who worshipped Christ.

4. Suetonius (c. 69–122 CE) – A Roman historian who, in The Twelve Caesars, mentions disturbances in Rome caused by "Chrestus," which some scholars believe could refer to Christ.

5. Lucian of Samosata (c. 125–180 CE) – A satirical writer who mocked Christians and referred to Jesus as a crucified philosopher.

6. Mara Bar Serapion (late 1st to early 3rd century CE) – A Stoic philosopher who wrote about the unjust execution of a "wise king" of the Jews, which some interpret as a reference to Jesus.

While these non-Christian sources don’t provide firsthand accounts, they show that people heard about Jesus and his followers. However, none of these writers were contemporary eyewitnesses. There are no known non-Christian, contemporary eyewitness accounts of Jesus' life, death, or resurrection. The only writings that claim to be from eyewitnesses are the Christian texts, primarily the New Testament Gospels and letters. However, their authorship and eyewitness status are also debated by scholars.

Key Points to Consider:

1. No Secular Eyewitness Accounts

• No contemporary Roman, Jewish, or Greek historian who was alive during Jesus' time wrote about him directly.

• The non-Christian sources that mention Jesus (e.g., Josephus, Tacitus, Pliny the Younger) were written decades after his supposed lifetime and rely on secondhand reports.

2. The New Testament as Eyewitness Testimony?

• The Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) were written several decades after Jesus' death (c. 30 CE), with Mark being the earliest (c. 65–70 CE).

• The authorship of the Gospels is traditionally attributed to Jesus' disciples or their associates, but many scholars question whether they were written by direct eyewitnesses.

• Paul, a major figure in early Christianity, wrote extensively about Jesus but never met him during his lifetime—his knowledge of Jesus came from visions and oral tradition.

The only potential eyewitness accounts come from the Christian tradition, primarily the New Testament authors, but their direct connection to Jesus remains debated. Outside of Christian sources, there are no surviving firsthand, contemporary eyewitness accounts of Jesus. While many scholarly resources expose the inconsistencies and fabrications of the New Testament Messiah, the only true and unchanging source of authority is the Hebrew ToRaH of YaHuWaH.

Every claim—whether from scholars, religious leaders, or even our own upbringing—must be tested against His Word. If it does not align with the ToRaH, the Prophets, and the Writings, then it is not the God of Israel's truth. Measuring everything against the unchanging words of YaHuWaH, because only His commandments and His prophecies define what is true and what is deception. Let's take a deeper dive into this.

1. Historical and Political Context of Christianity’s Formation

The New Testament, written decades after the supposed events of Jesus' life, reflects theological agendas rather than firsthand historical accounts. Christianity as we know it took form under the influence of Greco-Roman thought and imperial politics. The Flavian dynasty, particularly Emperor Vespasian and his son Titus, sought to pacify rebellious Jewish factions by promoting a version of Judaism that emphasized submission and non-resistance. This aligns with the portrayal of Jesus in the Gospels as a figure who preaches turning the other cheek (Matthew 5:39) and rendering unto Caesar (Mark 12:17).

Many scholars, including those cited in Creating Christianity: A Weapon of Ancient Rome, argue that the pacifist message of Jesus directly served Roman interests. The historical silence of contemporary Jewish records regarding Jesus—such as those of Philo of Alexandria, who lived during the supposed time of Jesus but never mentioned him—raises serious doubts about his existence.

2. Contradictions Between the Hebrew Scriptures and the New Testament

A core issue with the New Testament is its deviation from the Hebrew Torah and Prophets. If Jesus were the prophesied Messiah, his life and mission would align perfectly with the Hebrew scriptures. However, this is not the case.

A. The Messiah Was to Establish Peace and Rule on Earth

According to Micah 5:2-5, the ruler from Bethlehem would bring peace and dominion over Israel. Isaiah 11:1-9 describes the Messianic age as one where the wolf and the lamb coexist, and war ceases. Jesus did not fulfill this—Israel remained under Roman occupation, and no era of peace emerged. To this day, wars and killing still rage throughout the earth.

B. The Law (Torah) is Eternal and Cannot Be Changed

The Torah explicitly states that it is everlasting:

• Deuteronomy 4:2 – “You shall not add to the word that I command you, nor take from it, that you may keep the commandments of YaHuWaH your ALuWHiYM that I command you.”

• Psalm 119:160 – “The sum of Your word is truth, and every one of Your righteous rules endures forever.”

Yet, the New Testament introduces drastic changes. Paul, in particular, contradicts the Torah by teaching that faith in Jesus replaces the observance of the Law (Galatians 3:10-13). This is a direct violation of the eternal nature of the Torah.

C. The Lineage of the Messiah Must Be Through David’s Bloodline

The Hebrew scriptures establish that the Messiah must come through the direct lineage of King David (2 Samuel 7:12-16, Jeremiah 23:5-6). However, the New Testament claims Jesus was born of a virgin by way of the Holy Spirit (Matthew 1:18-23), which makes it impossible for him to have inherited Davidic lineage through Joseph. In Hebrew lineage and inheritance, tribal identity is strictly determined through the father's bloodline, not the mother’s. This is established in the Torah, where genealogies are consistently traced through the male descendants (Numbers 1:18, Ezra 2:59).

If the claim of the New Testament is that Mary was impregnated by the Holy Spirit, then no human male sperm from a Hebrew father was involved. This presents a serious contradiction because, according to the Torah, a person’s tribal identity, inheritance, and legitimacy as a descendant of David must come through an earthly Hebrew father, which, in this case, is absent.

Without a human Hebrew father, the New Testament Messiah would have no legitimate claim to the throne of David, nor could he be considered an Israelite by lineage. This completely disqualifies him from fulfilling the Messianic prophecies that require the Messiah to be a direct patrilineal descendant of King David (2 Samuel 7:12-16, Jeremiah 23:5-6).

3. New Testament Pagan Influences

The attributes of Jesus, Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA, etc., strongly resemble pagan deities such as Mithras, Horus, and Dionysus, all of whom were born of virgins, performed miracles, and were associated with resurrection. The Trinity concept, absent from the Hebrew scriptures, mirrors triadic gods in pagan traditions (e.g., the Egyptian Osiris-Isis-Horus). If the God of Israel is Jealous, why steal traditions from pagan nations and pawn them off as His own.

If YaHuWaH is a jealous, mighty one who demands all esteem and credit for His works, then it makes no sense for Him to steal concepts and traditions of worship from pagan nations and incorporate them into His own worship. Doing so would strip Him of exclusivity because He would have borrowed from the very nations He commanded Israel to avoid.

The Hebrew Scriptures make it clear that YaHuWaH’s worship is set apart and that He does not adopt the customs of idolatrous nations:

• Deuteronomy 4:2 – "You shall not add to the word which I command you, nor shall you take away from it, that you may keep the commandments of YaHuWaH your mighty one which I command you."
  → If pagan elements were later added into worship, they would corrupt His original commandments.

• Deuteronomy 12:4 – "You shall not worship YaHuWaH your mighty one in their way."
  → This is a direct warning not to copy pagan traditions in worship.

• Deuteronomy 12:31 – "You shall not do so to YaHuWaH your mighty one, for every abomination to YaHuWaH, which He hates, they have done to their gods."
  → If He hates the practices of pagan nations, why would He later incorporate their myths and symbols into His worship?

• Isaiah 42:8 – "I am YaHuWaH, that is My Name; and My glory I will not give to another, nor My praise to graven images."
  → If YaHuWaH does not share His glory, then the New Testament’s elevation of a Messiah figure, resembling pagan gods, contradicts this.

• Exodus 34:14 – "For you shall worship no other god, for YaHuWaH, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous mighty one."
  → If YaHuWaH is jealous and does not share His glory, why would He introduce elements of paganism into His worship?

• Jeremiah 10:2 – "Thus says YaHuWaH: Learn not the way of the nations..."
  → Christianity absorbed many traditions from pagan Rome, including the deification of a man and virgin birth myths, which were never part of the Hebrew Scriptures.

If the New Testament Messiah’s attributes—such as a virgin birth, miracles, resurrection, and a triadic godhead—mirror the pagan myths of Mithras, Horus, and Dionysus, then these are not original to YaHuWaH. If He had to steal and repackage these ideas, then He would not be unique, and He would not be the sovereign mighty one who established His own set-apart laws and worship. This is why the unchanging Torah is the only reliable source for worshiping the true God of Israel—not man-made doctrines or intermediaries influenced by pagan traditions.

Additionally, speaking in tongues, a common Christian practice (Acts 2:1-4), closely resembles ancient pagan ecstatic speech used in Greek mystery religions. Historical research confirms that such practices predate Christianity, suggesting appropriation rather than divine inspiration.

4. Scholarly Sources and Evidence

Beyond Creating Christianity: A Weapon of Ancient Rome, consider the following works that examine the fabrication of Jesus and the New Testament:

• Joseph Atwill – Caesar’s Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus

• Bart D. Ehrman – Forged: Writing in the Name of God – Why the Bible’s Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are

• John Allegro – The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross (Explores Christianity’s connections to fertility cults and hallucinogenic traditions)

• Hyam Maccoby – The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity (Analyzes Paul’s departure from Judaism and his role in shaping Christianity)

The Hebrew scriptures provide no support for Jesus as the Messiah, and historical analysis suggests Christianity was engineered for social and political control. The Torah remains the true and eternal word of YaHuWaH. Returning to its original teachings without the distortions of the New Testament is the best path to clarity and truth.

credible eyewitness:

Even if there were credible eyewitness accounts of Jesus performing miracles, dying on a cross, and resurrecting, it would not prove that he was the true Messiah according to the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) because these events do not align with what the Hebrew scriptures say about the Messiah. Here’s why:

1. The Hebrew Bible Does Not Describe the Messiah as a Miracle Worker

• Nowhere in the Torah, Prophets, or Writings does it say that the Messiah will prove himself through miracles like healing the sick, walking on water, or raising the dead.

• While miracles occur in the Tanakh (e.g., Moses, Elijah, Elisha), they are performed by prophets and do not define messianic identity.

2. The Messiah Is Not Described as Dying for Sins

• The Christian claim that Jesus' death was an "atoning sacrifice" contradicts the Torah’s system of atonement, which requires repentance, prayer, and sacrifices in the Temple (Leviticus 17:11, Ezekiel 18:20-22).

• The Messiah in the Hebrew Bible is a victorious king, not a suffering savior who dies for sins.

3. The Messiah Will Not Be Crucified

• The Torah calls hanging on a tree (crucifixion) a curse (Deuteronomy 21:23).

• Nowhere in the Hebrew Bible does it say the Messiah will be cursed or die in this manner.

4. The Resurrection of the Messiah Is Not Mentioned

• The Hebrew Bible speaks of a future resurrection of the dead (Daniel 12:2, Isaiah 26:19) but does not say the Messiah himself will die and resurrect.

• Instead, the Messiah is expected to live and reign as a king, bringing peace to Israel and ruling in righteousness.

5. The True Messiah Will Establish Global Peace and Torah Observance

• The key prophecies of the Messiah (Isaiah 2:2-4, Isaiah 11:1-10, Ezekiel 37:24-28) describe:

  • The end of war and establishment of peace.

  • The gathering of Israel back to the land.

  • The restoration of the Davidic kingdom.

  • The universal knowledge of YaHuWaH and Torah observance.

• These prophecies were never fulfilled by Jesus. Instead, war, exile, and suffering continued.

Even if Jesus' miracles, crucifixion, and resurrection were documented by eyewitnesses, this would not confirm his messianic status because the Hebrew Bible never describes the Messiah as needing to perform miracles, die for sins, or resurrect from the dead. The true Messiah, according to the Hebrew scriptures, will be a righteous king who restores Israel, brings world peace, and leads all nations to follow the Torah—which Jesus did not do. The Hebrew Bible explicitly warns against false prophets who perform signs and wonders, emphasizing that miracles are not proof of divine truth. Even if someone performs great signs, if they teach something that contradicts the Torah, Israel is commanded not to follow them.

1. The Torah Warns Against False Prophets Performing Signs and Wonders

• Deuteronomy 13:1-5 (verses 2-6 in some translations) states:
  “If a prophet or a dreamer of dreams arises among you and gives you a sign or a wonder, and the sign or wonder comes to pass, of which he spoke to you, saying, ‘Let us go after other gods, which you have not known, and let us serve them,’ you shall not listen to the words of that prophet or that dreamer of dreams. For YaHuWaH your ALuWHiYM (mighty one) is testing you, to know whether you love YaHuWaH your ALuWHiYM with all your heart and with all your soul. You shall walk after YaHuWaH your ALuWHiYM and fear Him, and keep His commandments, and obey His voice, and you shall serve Him and hold fast to Him.”

  → This passage makes it clear that signs and wonders alone do not validate a prophet. If they lead people away from Torah, they are false, even if their miracles seem real.

2. The True Messiah Will Not Be Identified by Miracles

• Nowhere in the Hebrew Bible is the Messiah said to prove his identity through healing, raising the dead, or walking on water.

• Instead, the Messiah’s role is to restore Israel, bring world peace, and uphold the Torah (Isaiah 2:2-4, Ezekiel 37:24-28, Jeremiah 23:5-6).

3. Miracles Can Be Deceptive – Even Pharaoh’s Magicians Could Perform Wonders

• Exodus 7:10-12 – Pharaoh’s magicians were able to turn staffs into serpents, just as Moses and Aaron did.

• Exodus 7:22, 8:7 – The magicians could turn water to blood and bring forth frogs, showing that even deceptive forces can perform wonders.

• This demonstrates that miracles alone are not a sign of divine authority—only alignment with Torah matters.

4. The Hebrew Bible Warns About Following False Messiahs or Prophets

• Jeremiah 23:16-17 – “Do not listen to the words of the prophets who prophesy to you, filling you with false hope… They speak visions from their own minds, not from the mouth of YaHuWaH.”

• Ezekiel 13:9 – False prophets deceive the people but are not sent by YaHuWaH.

• Zechariah 13:2-3 – There will come a time when false prophets will be exposed and rejected by their own families.

Conclusion

Even if Jesus or anyone else performed signs and wonders, this would not validate them as the Messiah. The Hebrew Bible clearly warns that false prophets can do miracles but must be judged based on whether they uphold the Torah and YaHuWaH’s commandments. Since the true Messiah’s role is never described as being a miracle worker, dying for sins, or resurrecting, anyone who fits that profile does not align with the Hebrew Bible’s messianic prophecies and should not be followed.

1. If Jesus Were Real, His Actions OR LACK THEREOF Would Still Disqualify Him as the Messiah

A. The True Messiah Must Establish Global Peace and Rule from Israel

The Hebrew Scriptures are explicit that the Messiah will bring worldwide peace and establish a just kingdom in Israel.

• Micah 4:2-3 – “He will judge between many peoples and will settle disputes for strong nations far and wide. They will beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation will not take up sword against nation, nor will they train for war anymore.”

• Isaiah 2:4 – “He shall judge among the nations and shall rebuke many people; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore.”

However, Jesus did not establish worldwide peace. Instead, his supposed arrival led to greater conflict:

• Rome continued its oppression of Israel.

• The destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE occurred after his death.

• Christianity itself led to religious wars, crusades, and inquisitions.

Jesus’ statement contradicts the expectation of peace:

• Matthew 10:34 – “Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.”

This is in direct opposition to the Hebrew Scriptures' Messianic prophecies.

B. The True Messiah Must Be a Direct Descendant of King David

The Hebrew Bible states the Messiah must be from the seed (physical lineage or sperm) of David:

• 2 Samuel 7:12-16 – “I will raise up your offspring after you, who shall come from your body, and I will establish his kingdom.”

• Jeremiah 23:5 – “Behold, the days come, saith YaHuWaH, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth.”

The New Testament claims Jesus was born of a virgin (Matthew 1:18-23), meaning he had no biological father. If Jesus had no human father, he could not be the seed of David, disqualifying him from being the Messiah.

C. The Messiah Must Lead Israel Back to Torah, Not Abolish It

The Hebrew Scriptures emphasize that the Torah is eternal:

• Deuteronomy 12:32 – “Whatever I command you, you shall be careful to do. You shall not add to it or take from it.”

• Psalm 119:152 – “Long ago I learned from Your statutes that You established them to last forever.”

However, the New Testament claims that Jesus altered the Torah, a command the God of Israel established no one can do:

• Matthew 5:17-18 – “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.”

• Romans 10:4 (Paul’s teaching) – “For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.”

Jesus did not restore Israel to Torah observance but instead became the foundation for Christianity, which teaches that belief replaces obedience. This is a violation of the Torah itself. The pure proof is that there are 2.6 billion people following the Christian ideology worldwide and not Torah.

D. Human Sacrifice is Forbidden in the Torah

The core doctrine of Christianity is that Jesus died as a sacrifice for sin. However, the Hebrew Scriptures strictly forbid human sacrifice:

• Deuteronomy 24:16 – “Every man shall be put to death for his own sin.”

• Exodus 23:7 – “Do not put an innocent or honest person to death, for I will not acquit the guilty.”

• Ezekiel 18:20 – “The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, nor the father bear the iniquity of the son.”

Christianity contradicts this by teaching that Jesus died for the sins of others. This idea is foreign to Torah law and rooted in pagan practices of substitutionary atonement.

2. Jesus’ Teachings Conflict with the Hebrew Bible

A. He Claimed to Be Divine, Which Contradicts the Torah

The Hebrew Scriptures affirm the oneness of YaHuWaH and explicitly reject the idea of a man being God:

• Deuteronomy 6:4 – “Hear, O Israel: YaHuWaH is our mighty one, YaHuWaH is one.”

• Numbers 23:19 – “The mighty one is not a man, that He should lie, nor a son of man, that He should change His mind.”

• Isaiah 42:8 – “I am YaHuWaH; that is my name! I will not yield my glory to another.”

Yet, Jesus is recorded as saying:

• John 10:30 – “I and the Father are one.”

• John 8:58 – “Before Abraham was, I am.”

These statements contradict the Hebrew Bible, which consistently distinguishes between the Creator and His creation.

B. Jesus Promoted Disloyalty to Family

• Luke 14:26 – “If anyone comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters—yes, even their own life—such a person cannot be my disciple.”

This teaching contradicts the Torah’s commandment to honor parents:

• Exodus 20:12 – “Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long in the land that YaHuWaH your ALuWHiYM (mighty one) is giving you.”

3. Conclusion

Even if Jesus existed as a historical figure, his life and actions disqualify him from being the Messiah according to the Hebrew TaNaKh which Christians claim is their foundation text. His teachings conflict with the eternal Torah, the promise to David, and the nature of YaHuWaH.

Christianity presents a belief system that strays from Torah obedience, introduces foreign concepts, and ultimately misleads people into worshiping a figure (whether he existed or not) who does not align with the Hebrew prophecies. The Hebrew Scriptures alone remain the true guide to understanding the Creator’s will. The best way forward is to remain rooted in Torah and seek truth through the Hebrew Scriptures rather than man-made doctrines.

Even if Jesus was a real historical figure, that alone does not make him the Messiah. Many individuals throughout history have risen up against oppressive powers, amassing followers and being seen as divinely sent to free their people. However, the mere existence of such a person does not equate to fulfilling the specific requirements laid out in the Hebrew Scriptures for the Messiah.

Throughout history, various figures have led revolts, opposed ruling powers, and inspired movements. This includes:

• Judas Maccabeus (167–160 BCE) – Led the Maccabean Revolt against the Seleucid Empire.

• Simon bar Kokhba (132–135 CE) – Led a Jewish revolt against Rome and was even proclaimed as the Messiah by some.

• Many later revolutionaries and leaders who fought against oppression, gathered followers and were considered liberators.

Yet, none of these men were the Messiah, because the Hebrew Bible clearly outlines what the true Messiah must accomplish.

1. The Hebrew Scriptures Provide Clear Messianic Prophecies

The beauty of the Hebrew Torah is that it was not given in secret, nor left to be deciphered through hidden codes, personal interpretations, or dreams. Instead, YaHuWaH delivered all His instructions openly through His Hebrew prophets, ensuring that His message remained intact and unaltered. Everything has already been laid out and established, providing a measuring stick against which all opinions, doctrines, and beliefs can be tested against the unchanging Torah of the God of Israel.

Scriptural Support:

Amos 3:7 – "Surely YaHuWaH will do nothing, but He reveals His secret unto His servants the prophets."

• YaHuWaH does not act in secret; He revealed His will and plans to His prophets so that His people can know His ways.

Isaiah 45:19 – "I have not spoken in secret, in a dark place of the earth; I said not unto the seed of Yaʿaqob, Seek ye Me in vain: I YaHuWaH speak righteousness, I declare things that are right."

• YaHuWaH clearly states that His message is not hidden or obscure; He speaks openly and declares His truth.

Deuteronomy 29:29 – "The secret things belong unto YaHuWaH our mighty one: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this Torah."

• YaHuWaH reveals what is necessary for His people to understand and obey. His revealed word is not secret but meant to be followed openly.

Jeremiah 23:23-24 – "Am I a mighty one at hand, saith YaHuWaH, and not a mighty one afar off? Can any hide himself in secret places that I shall not see him? saith YaHuWaH. Do not I fill heaven and earth? saith YaHuWaH."

• YaHuWaH is all-knowing and sees all; nothing is hidden from Him.

Isaiah 48:16 – "Come ye near unto Me, hear ye this; I have not spoken in secret from the beginning; from the time that it was, there am I."

• YaHuWaH declares that He has never spoken in secret, emphasizing the clarity and openness of His word.

• Numbers 12:6-8 – "If there is a prophet among you, I, YaHuWaH, make Myself known to him in a vision; I speak to him in a dream. Not so with My servant Moses; he is faithful in all My house. I speak with him face to face, even plainly, and not in dark sayings..."
  → YaHuWaH’s message was not given in riddles or hidden codes—it was spoken clearly through His prophets, especially Moses.

• Deuteronomy 29:29 – "The secret things belong to YaHuWaH our mighty one, but those things which are revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this Torah."
  → The Torah was fully revealed to Israel, leaving no mystery or hidden doctrine—it was meant to be followed as written.

• Malachi 3:6 – "For I am YaHuWaH, I do not change; therefore you are not consumed, O sons of Yaʿaqob."
  → Because YaHuWaH does not change, neither do His laws, statutes, and commandments—this ensures the integrity of His message.

• Isaiah 8:20 – "To the Torah and to the testimony! If they do not speak according to this word, it is because there is no light in them."
  → Every doctrine must be tested against the unchanging Torah. If it contradicts the Torah, it is false.

• Psalm 119:89 – "Forever, O YaHuWaH, Your word is firmly fixed in the heavens."
  → The Torah is eternal and unchanging, serving as the ultimate authority for truth.

• Deuteronomy 4:2 – "You shall not add to the word which I command you, nor take from it, that you may keep the commandments of YaHuWaH your mighty one which I command you."
  → No new revelations, books, or testaments can override or change what YaHuWaH already commanded.

By ensuring that His instructions were openly declared through His prophets, YaHuWaH preserved the integrity of His message. This means that we do not need to rely on human traditions, church doctrines, or personal interpretations—everything has already been established in the Hebrew Torah. Therefore, all opinions and religious claims must be tested against the Torah, the unchanging word of the God of Israel. This also applies to the coming MaShiYaCh, everything has already been laid out. The Messiah is not merely someone who opposes an empire or gathers followers. He must fulfill all of the following:

A. The Messiah Must Establish Global Peace and an Everlasting Kingdom

• Isaiah 2:4 – “He shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore.”

• Daniel 7:13-14 – “And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away.”

Did Jesus accomplish this? No. Instead, wars, division, and violence increased after his death.

B. The Messiah Must Gather and Restore All of Israel to the Land

• Isaiah 11:12 – “And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.”

• Ezekiel 37:24-25 – “And David my servant shall be king over them; and they all shall have one shepherd: they shall also walk in my judgments, and observe my statutes, and do them.”

Did Jesus gather all Israel back? No. Instead, after his death, Jerusalem was destroyed, and the Jewish people were further scattered.

C. The Messiah Must Rebuild the Temple

• Ezekiel 37:26-28 – “Moreover I will make a covenant of peace with them; it shall be an everlasting covenant with them: and I will place them, and multiply them, and will set my sanctuary in their midst forevermore.”

Did Jesus rebuild the Temple? No. Instead, it was destroyed in 70 CE, shortly after his time.

D. The Messiah Must Lead the World to Worship YaHuWaH Alone

• Zechariah 14:9 – “And YaHuWaH shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one YaHuWaH, and His name one.”

• Isaiah 66:23 – “And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one Sabbath to another, all flesh shall come to worship before me, saith YaHuWaH.”

Did Jesus establish universal worship of YaHuWaH alone? No. Instead, his followers created Christianity, which introduced worship of Jesus himself, violating the core of Torah (Deuteronomy 6:4).

2. Jesus Did Not Fulfill Any Messianic Prophecies

The New Testament attempts to apply various Hebrew prophecies to Jesus, but a deeper study shows that they are either misquoted or taken out of context. For example:

• Matthew 1:23 claims that Isaiah 7:14 prophesies Jesus’ virgin birth. However, Isaiah 7:14 in its proper Hebrew context refers to a young woman—Isaiah's wife the prophetess—giving birth to her second child during the time of King Ahaz, not a future Messiah. If this prophecy were meant to refer to Jesus, what relevance would it have had for King Ahaz and Israel, who were at that time facing immediate threats from surrounding nations? The prophecy was intended to provide hope and a sign to the people of Israel in that present moment that the God of Israel would, not something to be fulfilled 700 years later.

• Matthew 2:15 cites Hosea 11:1 to claim that Jesus fulfilled the prophecy by coming out of Egypt. But Exodus 4:22-23 and Hosea 11:1 in proper Hebrew context clearly states from YaHuWaH the nation of Israel that His firstborn and anointed son is the Nation of Israel, not the Messiah, a demigod, or a single person. This is another classic case of The New Testament misusing the Hebrew Bible to fit its narrative.

3. The Messiah Must Be a Physical Descendant of David

• Jeremiah 23:5 – “Behold, the days come, saith YaHuWaH, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper.”

• 2 Samuel 7:12-16 – The Messiah must come from the direct lineage of King David.

Problem: The New Testament claims Jesus was born of a virgin (Matthew 1:18-23). If he had no human father, he could not be a descendant of David. The genealogies in Matthew and Luke contradict each other and fail to prove his lineage.

4. Conclusion

Many individuals have risen up to challenge authority and gather followers. However, this alone does not make them the Messiah. Even if Jesus was a real historical figure, that alone does not make him the Messiah. Many individuals throughout history have risen up against oppressive powers, amassing followers and being seen as divinely sent to free their people. Throughout history, various figures have led revolts, opposed ruling powers, and inspired movements. This includes:

Judas Maccabeus (167–160 BCE

• Led the Maccabean Revolt against the Seleucid Empire.

Simon bar Kokhba (132–135 CE)

• Led a Jewish revolt against Rome and was even proclaimed as the Messiah by some.

Many later revolutionaries and leaders

• who fought against oppression, gathered followers and were considered liberators.

  MODERN DAY

• Here are some modern-day individuals who rose up against the powers that be to bring about significant social or political change, similar to figures like Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr.:

  1. Nelson Mandela

     • A key figure in the fight against apartheid in South Africa, Mandela spent 27 years in prison before becoming the country’s first black president. He helped dismantle the system of racial segregation and oppression in South Africa.

  2. Mahatma Gandhi

     • Gandhi led the nonviolent resistance against British colonial rule in India, ultimately helping the country gain independence in 1947. His philosophy of peaceful protest influenced civil rights movements around the world.

  3. Cesar Chavez

     • Chavez was a labor leader and civil rights activist who fought for the rights of farm workers in the United States, particularly focusing on better working conditions, pay, and recognition of unions for agricultural workers.

  4. Rosa Parks

     • Parks became an iconic figure in the Civil Rights Movement when she refused to give up her seat on a segregated bus in Montgomery, Alabama, sparking the Montgomery Bus Boycott and becoming a catalyst for the broader movement.

  5. Aung San Suu Kyi

     • Aung San Suu Kyi led the opposition to the military dictatorship in Myanmar and spent years under house arrest. She became an international symbol of peaceful resistance and the struggle for democracy.

  6. Wangari Maathai

     • Maathai was an environmentalist and political activist from Kenya who founded the Green Belt Movement, promoting tree planting, environmental conservation, and women's empowerment, while also challenging political corruption.

  7. Emma Gonzalez

     • A survivor of the 2018 mass shooting at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, Emma became a prominent gun control activist, advocating for stricter regulations on firearms and speaking out against the influence of the National Rifle Association (NRA).

  8. Greta Thunberg

     • Thunberg is a Swedish environmental activist who gained global recognition for her leadership in the climate change movement. Her activism has spurred worldwide protests calling for stronger action on global warming.

  9. Malala Yousafzai

     • After surviving a gunshot attack by the Taliban, Malala became a powerful advocate for girls' education, women's rights, and social justice, especially in Pakistan, where she continues to fight for the right to education for girls globally.

  10. Bobby Seale and Huey P. Newton

      • Founders of the Black Panther Party, Seale and Newton led the fight against racial inequality, police brutality, and systemic oppression in the United States during the 1960s and 1970s.

  These individuals, like Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr., rose against oppressive systems and worked for justice and social change in their respective contexts.

  While these individuals—such as Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Gandhi, Cesar Chavez, Rosa Parks, Aung San Suu Kyi, Wangari Maathai, Emma Gonzalez, Greta Thunberg, Malala Yousafzai, Bobby Seale, and Huey P. Newton—made profound impacts in their struggles against oppression, injustice, and inequality, none of them were the Messiah.

  While they rose up to challenge the powers that be and made significant strides in their respective movements, they did not fulfill the specific prophecies of the future Messiah as outlined in the Hebrew Scriptures. Their actions were heroic and transformative, but they did not meet the criteria or role set forth by the God of Israel for the Messiah, as detailed in the Hebrew Bible.

The Hebrew Bible clearly outlines what the true Messiah must accomplish. Christianity has misinterpreted and distorted the Hebrew Scriptures to create a figure who does not align with the true Messiah of Israel. If you are seeking the truth, the best course is to remain rooted in Torah and study the Hebrew prophecies directly.

The Hebrew Bible provides specific criteria for the Messiah, and Jesus failed to meet them. Whether he existed or not is irrelevant because he simply did not fulfill the prophecies and the Creator Himself identifies the nation of Israel as His son. YaHuWaH’s word is eternal, and the Hebrew Scriptures provide the true guide to understanding the Messiah.

QUESTION: Many pastors and Christians tell me that I don’t need to know Hebrew to understand the New Testament here in America because we speak English. However, if the Hebrew Torah is historically the foundation of the Christian religion, shouldn’t I at least research what the original text says?

ANSWER: You are 100% correct, and your question highlights a crucial aspect of the relationship between the Hebrew Torah (the first 5 books of the Old Testament) and the New Testament. Regardless of personal beliefs, the facts prove that the New Testament and the religion of Christianity are intrinsically linked to Hebrew idioms and cultural nuances from which it originated. A comprehensive understanding of these Hebrew elements is essential, as it greatly reduces the risk of personal interpretation (one’s truth) or distortion of the texts' intended messages. Furthermore, understanding the original Hebrew context is essential to avoid theological misunderstandings and falsehood. As you pointed out, the gap between Western Christian teachings and the Hebrew Scriptures frequently arises from a lack of engagement with the Hebrew language, proper context, and culture.

We (WOTR) come from Christianity and fully understand that Christians, for the most part, are not bad people, and often many are loving and compassionate. What we can see in hindsight is that it is not entirely their fault. From the time we're little, when our parents tuck us into bed, we learn to pray to Jesus. Our parent or loved one tells us, “Jesus loves you so much that He died for you.” This powerful message conditions us when we are little, that despite our shortcomings and mistakes, we can rely on Jesus to always help us. As we grow up, we read the New Testament Gospels, which are beautifully written and contain compelling and emotional stories with well-developed characters. The protagonist is Jesus, while the antagonists are primarily the religious Jewish leaders of His time who reject Him, along with Satan, a being whose power rivals that of God. From a human perspective, it's astonishing to read Jesus performing miracles—healing the sick, the paralyzed, and even those with leprosy—only to be criticized by some Jews for healing on the Sabbath.

These narratives are emotionally evocative. Jesus is portrayed as the kindest and most perfect person imaginable. So holy that He was conceived through the union of the Holy Spirit and a virgin, granting Him a divine-human or demigod-like status, completely sinless, without ever having a single sinful or lustful thought throughout His life. He goes around doing good, healing everyone, and saving them from various ailments. Unlike family members who may have betrayed us, Jesus remains loyal and trustworthy and would never betray us. As Christians, we grow up being taught how Jesus is woven throughout the Hebrew TaNaKh (AKA the entire Old Testament), laying the groundwork for the transformative events of the New Testament. This repeated Western narrative shared by loved ones, friends, and reaffirmed in church shapes our understanding, faith, redemption, and ultimately our reality.

On the other hand, Hebrews and Jews in the Middle East—particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean region—often grow up studying the Hebrew Torah in its original language, immersing themselves in their ancient culture and the prophecies that speak of the undeniable events of the Messianic age. They learn about a future where all war will cease, as Isaiah 2 states, "Nation will not lift up sword against nation." This age will bring about a universal knowledge of the God Israel, YaHuWaH, the gathering of exiled Israelites, the restoration of the Davidic dynasty, and the rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem. The prophet Elijah will herald the coming of the Messiah, and through this, all nations will come to recognize and praise the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, YaHuWaH alone. In that time, every nation will unite in harmony, speaking in a pure language (acknowledging that the God Israel YaHuWaH alone is to be praised), as described in passages like Isaiah 11, Zephaniah 3, and Ezekiel 37. This vision is clear and profound, encompassing the hope and expectation that the coming Messiah will fulfill these promises. This is why Christians believe Jesus is the Messiah, while both modern Jews and the Hebrews from ancient times reject him as the true Messiah.

Regardless of personal opinion, the historical facts and evidence in the Hebrew Torah prove that the New Testament and Christianity can’t exist without the established, unchanging concepts in the Hebrew Bible. The Hebrew Bible is a foundational text that records the history, Torah, and teachings of the Hebrew Israelites (not Christians), focusing on their eternal covenant with their mighty one, YaHuWaH, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. This father-son relationship encompasses their journey, struggles, and relationship with Him, highlighting the significance of obedience to His commandments, worshiping Him alone, and the promises made to their ancestors (Exodus 4:22-23 and Hosea 11:1).

When many Christians assert that knowledge of Hebrew is unnecessary for understanding the Westernized New Testament, they overlook the foundational role that the Hebrew Bible plays in shaping the teachings, themes, and meanings of the New Testament. Paradoxically, they often claim to understand and explain the scriptures more effectively than those whose culture has involved speaking and learning these concepts from birth.

Comparing this situation to an American traveler insisting they understand Japanese better than a native speaker highlights the arrogance and dismissal of the rich cultural and linguistic heritage that informs the Hebrew Bible. Just as it would be presumptuous for someone unfamiliar with Japanese to correct a native speaker, it is equally presumptuous for those lacking Hebrew knowledge to teach doctrines that contradict the original meanings found in the Hebrew Scriptures.

This disconnect can lead to significant theological errors, particularly when doctrines are filtered through a Greco-Roman lens rather than approached from the original Hebrew perspective. The misunderstanding of key concepts—such as obedience to the Torah, the identity of Israel, and the nature of the God of Israel’s promises—can stem from this misinterpretation.

Therefore, researching the Hebrew origins of biblical texts is not just beneficial but essential for a more accurate understanding of the New Testament and its various claims. Engaging with the original language allows for a deeper appreciation of the Scriptures and a more authentic relationship with the teachings of the God of Israel. By doing so, one can better grasp the richness of the biblical narrative and avoid the pitfalls of theological distortion. Ultimately, striving for an understanding rooted in the original Hebrew context fosters clarity and truth, exposing the various misconceptions in Christianity and among New Testament believers.

Proverbs 4:7 is excellent in this context. The verse states, "Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding." This emphasizes the importance of seeking wisdom and understanding, which is foundational when interpreting any text, including the New Testament.

In the context of your question, this verse underscores the necessity of studying the origins of the New Testament—specifically, the Torah and the Hebrew Scriptures. By gaining a thorough understanding of these foundational texts, one can approach the New Testament with greater insight and clarity, thereby avoiding misunderstandings and misinterpretations. This approach aligns with the belief that true wisdom comes from engaging deeply with the cultural, linguistic, and historical contexts of the Scriptures. Here are a few others:

1. Proverbs 4:7: "Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding."

   • This emphasizes the necessity of studying the origins of the New Testament, particularly the Torah, to gain true wisdom and understanding.

2. Deuteronomy 6:6-7: "And these words, which I command you this day, shall be in your heart: And you shall teach them diligently to your children..."

   • This highlights the importance of internalizing and teaching the commandments, suggesting that understanding the Torah is foundational for spiritual growth.

3. Psalm 119:105: "Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path."

   • This verse illustrates how a deep understanding of the Hebrew texts can illuminate one’s spiritual journey.

4. Isaiah 28:9-10: "Whom shall he teach knowledge? And whom shall he make to understand doctrine?... precept must be upon precept, line upon line..."

   • This underscores the gradual process of learning, indicating the importance of a foundational understanding of the Hebrew Scriptures.

5. Proverbs 1:7: "The fear of YaHuWaH is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction."

   • This highlights the necessity of seeking wisdom and instruction from the Hebrew Torah.

6. Ecclesiastes 12:12-13: "And further, by these, my son, be admonished... Fear YaHuWaH, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man."

   • This verse emphasizes that it is the duty of all people to obey the God of Israel’s commandments, reinforcing the idea that understanding and following the Torah is essential, rather than teaching or doctrines that contradict it.

These scriptures collectively emphasize the critical role of the Torah and Hebrew Scriptures in gaining wisdom and understanding, guiding believers to obey the God of Israel’s commandments as their primary duty. By studying these texts, individuals can better interpret the New Testament and avoid theological misunderstandings.

QUESTION: How do some Christians justify rejecting the Hebrew Bible as their foundation, while continually using the distinctly Hebrew word "Amen" in their prayers and speech—isn’t that an ironic contradiction?

ANSWER: You’re making a powerful observation that highlights yet another contradiction in the long list of inconsistencies within some Christian beliefs—specifically, the rejection of the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh or Torah) while continuing to use distinctly Hebrew elements like the word “Amen,” often without any acknowledgment or respect for the sacred Hebrew foundation from which their religion originates.

Let’s unpack this and contrast the logic behind the theology with the historical and linguistic truth.

🧩 1. The Dismissal of the Hebrew Bible (Torah)

Many modern Christians and New Testament believers are taught that:

• The Torah (YaHuWaH’s Law to Israel) was "fulfilled" and therefore “done away with” by the New Testament messiah (based on interpretations of verses like Matthew 5:17-18 or Romans 10:4).

• They often claim the Hebrew Bible is a "shadow" of the New Testament truth (Hebrews 10:1), no longer binding.

• The New Covenant is seen as replacing the timeless Torah, and many believe the Old Testament is just historical context, not a guide for daily living.

This theology downplays the authority and permanence of the Hebrew Torah, even though the God of Israel declares His word as eternal and perfect).

📜 2. But the God of Israel is Perfect, and His Torah is Eternal

Numerous scriptures clearly say nothing should be added or taken away from the Torah:

• Deuteronomy 4:2 – "Do not add to what I command you and do not subtract from it, but keep the commands of YaHuWaH your Elohim."

• Psalm 19:7 – "The Torah of YaHuWaH is perfect, restoring the soul."

• Ecclesiastes 3:14 – "Everything the mighty one does will endure forever; nothing can be added to it and nothing taken from it."

• Malachi 3:6 – "For I am YaHuWaH, I change not."

This presents a direct contradiction to the idea that the Torah could be nullified, amended or replaced.

🕎 3. The Hypocrisy of Using "Amen"

Despite holding these views, many Christians and New Testament believers still regularly end their prayers, sermons, songs, and even casual or non-Torah-based statements with the word “Amen.”

However, “Amen” is:

• A Hebrew word (אָמֵן, 'āmēn) meaning "so be it," "truly," or "let it be confirmed."

• Used throughout the Hebrew Bible, for example:

  • Deuteronomy 27:15-26 – the people respond “Amen” after each commandment.

  • Nehemiah 8:6 – the people respond to Ezra’s reading of the Torah with “Amen, Amen!”

The word is inherently a response of affirmation to the truth and authority of YaHuWaH’s Torah.

So when Christians say "Amen" after disregarding the Torah, it's as if they are affirming a covenant they claim has been replaced. It becomes a contradiction in both speech and practice.

⚖️ 4. Contrast: Hebrew Consistency vs. Christian Disconnection

🧠 Final Thought

Using “Amen” while rejecting the Hebrew Bible is like affirming a contract you claim is void. It’s inconsistent.

The root issue is that many Christians inherit a Westernized theology that has divorced itself from the Hebrew identity of the Scriptures and the true non-divine Messiah to come. Yet, Hebrew words like Amen, HalleluYah are repeatedly vocalized in churches. Even the concept of a Messiah (Mashiyach) is pulled out and used, stripped of its original cultural and scriptural context.

HaLaLuWYaH (הַלְלוּיָהּ or הַלְלוּ יָהּ) is a Hebrew phrase that means:

"Praise YaH" or "Give praise to YaHuWaH."

Breakdown:

• HaLaLuW (הַלְלוּ) = “Give praise” or “praise ye” (imperative plural verb).

• YaH (יָהּ) = A shortened form of YaHuWaH, the sacred name of the God of Israel.

So when someone said HalleluYah in ancient times, they were calling others to give praise to the God of Israel—YaHuWaH, not HalleluJes for Jesus/Yeshua, or HalleluLor for LORD. This phrase appears frequently in Psalms—especially in the last five chapters (Psalm 146–150)—where praise to YaHuWaH is emphasized repeatedly. Most Christians refused to seek out these facts because they are conditioned to cling to what feels right and is emotionally comfortable. Facts don’t care about feelings, nor does the God of Israel’s Torah.

QUESTION: According to the Hebrew Bible, what are the major prophecies that the true messiah will fulfill?

ANSWER: The Hebrew Bible (TaNaKh) provides a clear description of what the true Messiah will accomplish. While some lists vary slightly, the major prophecies that the Messiah must fulfill can be grouped into at least 10 key categories. Here is a numbered list of the major messianic prophecies:

1. The Messiah Will Be a Descendant of King David and Rule as King

• Jeremiah 23:5-6 – The Messiah will be a righteous king from David’s lineage.

• Ezekiel 37:24-25 – He will reign as king over Israel forever.

2. The Messiah Will Gather All the Exiles of Israel

• Isaiah 11:12 – He will bring back the scattered people of Judah and Israel.

• Ezekiel 37:21-22 – He will unite the 12 tribes into one nation.

3. The Messiah Will Establish Universal Peace and Justice

• Isaiah 2:2-4 – There will be no more war; nations will live in peace.

• Micah 4:3-4 – He will judge fairly among the nations.

4. The Messiah Will Rebuild or Restore the Holy Temple in Jerusalem

• Ezekiel 37:26-28 – YaHuWaH’s sanctuary will be among Israel forever.

• Zechariah 6:12-13 – He will build the Temple and rule as king.

5. The Messiah Will Lead the Entire World to Worship YaHuWaH Alone

• Zechariah 14:9 – "YaHuWaH will be king over all the earth."

• Isaiah 11:9 – "The earth will be filled with the knowledge of YaHuWaH."

6. The Messiah Will Uphold and Teach the Torah to All Nations

• Isaiah 2:3 – "For out of Zion shall go forth the Torah."

• Ezekiel 37:24 – "They will follow My laws and keep My decrees."

7. The Messiah Will Bring an Era of Resurrection for the Righteous

• Daniel 12:2 – "Many of those who sleep in the dust will awaken."

• Isaiah 26:19 – "Your dead shall live; their bodies shall rise."

8. The Messiah Will Bring Everlasting Joy and an End to Suffering

• Isaiah 51:11 – "Everlasting joy will crown their heads."

• Isaiah 25:8 – "He will swallow up death forever."

9. The Messiah Will Bring Righteous Judgment and End Wickedness

• Isaiah 11:3-4 – "He will judge with righteousness and decide with fairness."

• Psalm 72:1-4 – "He will judge the people with righteousness and the poor with justice."

10. The Messiah Will Not Be a Deity or Perform Miracles to Prove Himself

• Deuteronomy 13:1-5 – False prophets can perform signs and wonders; miracles do not prove divine truth.

• Numbers 23:19 – "ALuWHiYM (the mighty one) is not a man, that He should lie, nor a son of man, that He should change His mind."

Conclusion

The true Messiah must fulfill all these prophecies. So far, no one has accomplished these things, which is why the Messiah has not yet come according to the Hebrew Bible. Jesus did not fulfill these prophecies, which is why he cannot be the Messiah based on the criteria given in the TaNaKh.

QUESTION: If Christians believe that God ordains their relationships and marriages, why is the divorce rate so high among New Testament followers? When things go wrong, they claim that God hardened the other person’s heart. How does this align with the Hebrew Bible, which teaches that everything the God of Israel does is just, righteous, and perfect, needing no changes?

ANSWER: Many people have opinions on this topic, and while varying views can spark valuable discussions and diverse perspectives, we must ask ourselves: What do the Hebrew Bible and the God of Israel truly teach on this subject? The irony is that while the New Testament stresses marital faithfulness and commitment, divorce rates among Christians are comparable to those in secular society, and many Christians still claim the moral high ground while violating the principle of marital commitment. This Christian belief—that God "ordains" relationships but then "hardens" a person’s heart when cheating or various issues occur—contradicts key teachings of the Hebrew Bible. The Hebrew Scriptures emphasize that YaHuWaH is just, righteous, and perfect in all His ways (Deuteronomy 32:4), meaning He does not manipulate human choices to create or destroy relationships arbitrarily.

Due to all these contradictions and the understanding that the character of the God of Israel does not change, it becomes evident that the God of Israel in the Hebrew Bible is not the same as the God portrayed in Christianity. This distinction is highlighted when comparing the Old Testament with the New Testament, as they reflect different understandings of divine nature, expectations, and the role of law and grace.

The Hebrew Bible presents a consistent portrayal of the Creator as just, unchanging, and committed to His eternal covenant with Israel (not Christians), emphasizing the importance of obedience to the Hebrew Torah (not Christian Torah). In contrast, the New Testament introduces concepts of grace and redemption through the mere belief in the Messiah that conflict with the established guidelines in the Hebrew Torah, suggesting a shift in the understanding of the Creator's relationship with humanity. This fundamental difference reinforces the notion that these two depictions of God cannot be reconciled as the same entity. Does this mean that the God of the Old Testament has lost His power or changed His mind, now choosing to share His glory and praise with images, idols, objects, animals, or men and women for all His mighty works?

Isaiah 42:8
“I am YaHuWaH; that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images..”

Isaiah 48:11
“For My own sake, for My own sake, I will act; for how can I let Myself be defamed? I will not yield My glory to another.”

Exodus 20:3-5
“You shall have no other gods before Me. You shall not make for yourself a carved image or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or on the earth beneath, or in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I, YaHuWaH your mighty one, am a jealous God…”

Deuteronomy 4:15-16

 “Take ye therefore good heed unto yourselves; for ye saw no manner of similitude on the day that YaHuWaH spake unto you in Horeb out of the midst of the fire: Lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the similitude of any figure, the likeness of male or female,”

Deuteronomy 6:14-16
“You shall not go after other gods, the gods of the peoples who are around you—for YaHuWaH your mighty one in your midst is a jealous mighty one…” Lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the similitude of any figure, the likeness of male or female,

Psalm 115:4-8
“Their idols are silver and gold, the work of human hands. They have mouths, but do not speak; they have eyes, but do not see; they have ears, but do not hear; noses, but do not smell; they have hands, but do not feel; feet, but do not walk; and they do not make a sound in their throats. Those who make them become like them; so do all who trust in them.”

1. Free Will in the Hebrew Bible

The Hebrew Scriptures consistently affirm that people are given free will. YaHuWaH presents choices and consequences, allowing individuals to decide their actions. This includes the personal choice to follow teachings, doctrines, individuals, religion, or so-called saviors and demigods that contradict the unchanging Torah of the God of Israel. For example:

• Deuteronomy 13:1-3 -“If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder, And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them; Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for YaHuWaH your mighty one proveth (test) you, to know whether ye love YaHuWaH your mighty one with all your heart and with all your soul.”

• Deuteronomy 30:19 – "I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live."

• Joshua 24:15 – "Choose this day whom you will serve."

• Jeremiah 23:16-17 – “Do not listen to the words of the prophets who prophesy to you, filling you with false hope… They speak visions from their own minds, not from the mouth of YaHuWaH.”

• Ezekiel 13:9 – False prophets deceive the people but are not sent by YaHuWaH.

• Zechariah 13:2-3 – There will come a time when false prophets will be exposed and rejected by their own families.

These passages affirm that people are responsible for their own choices, including in relationships.

2. The God of Israel Does Not Ordain Relationships

Nowhere in the Hebrew Bible does it state that YaHuWaH handpicks and ordains every romantic relationship. While His unchanging Torah gives guidance to those who seek His wisdom in regard to what to look for in a partner (Deuteronomy 7:1–4, 23:3–6, Exodus34:12–16 and Numbers 25:1–3), YaHuWaH does not orchestrate unions or break them apart. Proverbs 18:22 states, "He who finds a wife finds a good thing and obtains favor from YaHuWaH," implying that finding a spouse is an act of personal agency, not divine orchestration. The keyword here is "finds" (מָצָא, matsa), which implies an active search rather than being handed a spouse by the God of Israel.

🔍 Key Word: מָצָא (matsa) – “finds”

• This Hebrew word מָצָא means to find, discover, attain, encounter, or come upon.

• It does not imply that YaHuWaH arranges or hand-delivers the wife.

• It implies a search, an active process, and a personal decision.

💡 So, what does this verse really teach?

• The man is the one doing the finding — he chooses.

• The favor from YaHuWaH comes as a result of wisely choosing a partner who also walks in Torah, not because He orchestrated the union behind the scenes.

• This choice lays the foundation for a household that serves YaHuWaH alone, not false mighty ones or idol mediators (Jesus, YeShua, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA).

• It highlights the natural blessing and positive outcome of finding a virtuous wife, not a divinely scripted soulmate situation.

🛑 What it doesn’t say:

• That “the God of Israel brought her to him.”

• That “the God of Israel him to marry her.”

• That “the God of Israel broke them apart.”

• That “every failed relationship or divorce was meant to be.”

👉 These are modern Christianized and New Testament believer ideas, not grounded in Torah or Hebrew wisdom literature.

🏛 In the broader Hebrew context:

• Marriages were community-based, involved family and elders, and were built around commitment and obedience to Torah values, not mystical matchmaking.

• YaHuWaH gave guidelines and boundaries (such as not marrying idolaters — see Deut. 7:3–4), but within that framework, humans are responsible for their choices.

Proverbs 18:22 affirms that finding a good wife is a blessing (BaRuWCh) — but it’s the man’s initiative, using Torah wisdom, discernment, and responsibility that lead to that blessing. The “favor from YaHuWaH” comes as a result, not as a form of divine matchmaking.

Torah directly challenges the modern Christian belief that "God will bring the right spouse," which aligns with the popular Christian worship song, "He may not come when you want Him, but He's always right on time." If that were true, the text in Proverbs 18:22 would have used language indicating divine selection or appointment. Instead, it emphasizes that a man is responsible for seeking and choosing his wife. If he chooses wisely according to Torah guidance, he receives favor, but if he chooses outside of it, the consequences are self-inflicted rather than a form of divine punishment.

We believe that real-life experiences, over time, serve as the most effective teachers, consistently revealing the facts and truth behind any subject. In today’s world, social media serves as a clear and accessible lens through which these realities are often brought to light. We continue to see countless New Testament believers faithfully pray to their mediator for years, seeking guidance from various sources to find the right partner. Yet, many experience repeated cycles of failed relationships, heartbreak, and even emotional or sexual trauma.

This raises an honest question: If this New Testament mediator is truly a source of perfect love, why subject his followers to years of turmoil after decades of devoted prayer? Is this divine love—or a troubling pattern of unmet promises? Did they not have faith the size of a mustard seed? Maybe they forgot to name it and claim it? At what point do people begin to question why their real-life experiences don't align with the beliefs they've been taught to accept without question and simply believe by faith? Additionally, and most importantly, are these experiences in line with the Creator's true design for relationships as outlined in the Torah?

In hindsight, most people can recognize warning signs in past relationships—whether they noticed them personally or were cautioned by loved ones. Often, the failure of these relationships wasn't due to the Creator assigning the wrong person, but rather the result of personal choices made outside the framework of the God of Israel’s design for marriage.

Many people today meet online, across different cultures, or even overseas, and insist that their union is divinely orchestrated, believing that God specifically brought them together. This belief is particularly common in modern Christian circles, where individuals are taught that "God will send the right person at the right time." However, when the relationship falls apart due to age, cultural differences and traditions, upbringing, past wounds, or religious beliefs, etc., instead of reassessing whether their initial assumption was flawed, they often shift the blame.

Instead of acknowledging that they made the choice themselves, they either:

1. Blame themselves – Thinking they lacked faith, patience, or spiritual strength to maintain the relationship.

2. Blame their partner – Accusing them of not being "equally yoked", not upholding their end, or not praying hard enough.

3. Spiritualize the failure – Believing that God took the relationship away because they weren’t "ready," didn’t trust Him enough, or that God had hardened the heart of their lover, preventing the relationship from succeeding.

This cycle creates cognitive dissonance because if the Creator truly ordained the relationship, it would not fail. The reality is that free will and personal responsibility play the primary role in relationships, not divine matchmaking. The Hebrew Bible (TaNaKh) consistently shows that people are responsible for choosing their spouses, and when poor choices are made, the consequences are natural outcomes, not divine intervention or punishment. This illustrates one of the many dangers of believing in a New Testament Messiah.

The New Testament-influenced mindset—that a mediator renders all individuals righteous in the eyes of the Creator—can lead to a diminished sense of personal accountability. This perspective often fosters the belief that one’s actions and ongoing lifestyle choices carry little consequence, as all outcomes, whether favorable or unfavorable, are seen as divinely orchestrated. In relationships where both partners adopt this view, genuine effort toward growth and improvement is frequently neglected, as responsibility is deferred to a divine figure to resolve conflicts. Because they are taught that the New Testament Messiah is eternally interceding at the right hand of the Father in heaven, this concept does not inspire genuine change or accountability for their disobedience to the Torah, allowing these behaviors to persist. The true meaning of sin is the act of breaking a commandment established by the God of Israel.

Has YaHuWaH Ever Orchestrated relationships?

The Hebrew Bible presents free will and personal choice as central to marriage:

• Adam and Eve – Though YaHuWaH created Eve, Adam still had to recognize her as his companion. He was not forced to accept her. (Genesis 2:22-23)

• Abraham and Sarah – Abraham chose Sarah, and even when Sarah gave Hagar to him, it was a human decision, not divinely orchestrated. (Genesis 16:2)

• Isaac and Rebekah – Abraham’s servant sought a wife for Isaac but asked for signs of character, not a divine matchmaking process. (Genesis 24)

• Ruth and Boaz – Ruth made a bold move to seek Boaz (Ruth 3:7-9), showing that people played an active role in their marital choices.

At no point does the Torah suggest that YaHuWaH assigns spouses like a divine matchmaker. Instead, human agency, wisdom, and discernment are emphasized in choosing a partner.

Contrast with Christian Thought

Many New Testament believers promote the idea that "God will bring you the right person," but this concept is absent from the Hebrew TaNaKh. Instead, the Hebrew TaNaKh emphasizes:

• Personal responsibility in seeking a wife.

• Wisdom and discernment in choosing a partner.

• Consequences of poor choices, such as Solomon’s foreign wives leading him into idolatry (1 Kings 11:1-4).

This aligns with Proverbs 18:22—finding a good wife is a blessing, but it is up to the man to find her. If divine matchmaking were a concept, the verse would read differently, as we pointed out.

3. The Issue of ‘Hardening the Heart’

Christians often cite the idea that God "hardened" someone's heart, referencing Pharaoh (Exodus 9:12). However, the Hebrew text shows that Pharaoh repeatedly hardened his own heart before YaHuWaH strengthened him in his own rebellion (Exodus 8:15, 8:32, 9:34). This does not equate to manipulating a person's emotions in personal relationships. The hardening of Pharaoh's heart was tied to divine justice against oppression, not interpersonal affairs.

4. The Christian Contradiction

If God truly "ordained" a relationship, why would He later intervene to "harden" one person’s heart, causing the relationship to fail? This contradicts the Hebrew Bible's teachings on YaHuWaH’s consistency and justice. Numbers 23:19 states:
"God is not a man, that He should lie, nor a son of man, that He should change His mind."
If God does not change, then the claim that He orchestrates relationships only to later break them apart is inconsistent with His nature.

5. Personal Responsibility in Relationships

The Hebrew Bible teaches that humans bear responsibility for their relationships. Proverbs provide wisdom on how to build and maintain strong relationships (e.g., Proverbs 3:3-4, 31:10-12). Failed relationships are often due to personal choices, lack of wisdom, or failure to apply Torah principles. This is one major reason you see so many single Christians on social media, still dating various people. In theory, if the Creator truly ordained relationships, there would be no need for Christian dating websites or human-facilitated matchmaking because He would be the one bringing people together according to His divine plan. What many fail to realize is that His plan has already been established 3,200 years ago, and it’s called the Hebrew Torah. Stop seeking New Testament-based relationship books, seminars, conferences, and marriage gurus, and read THE book that the Creator and God of Israel established for His people.

Christian Dating Websites: A Contradiction to Divine Ordination?

1. Reliance on Human Effort Instead of Faith

• If YaHuWaH truly brings two people together, then the concept of creating online profiles, scrolling through potential matches, and relying on algorithms contradicts the idea of divine matchmaking.

• Proverbs 3:5-6 states: “Trust in YaHuWaH with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.”

• If He is directing paths, then why would there be a need to create one’s own path through artificial dating methods?

2. Dating Websites Introduce a Marketplace Mentality

• Unless Torah guidelines are implemented, online dating often turns relationships into a consumer-like process, where people 'shop' for potential spouses based on desire and personal preferences.

• This is contrary to how Hebrew relationships traditionally operated, where both Hebrew families played a major role in the union.

3. The Lack of Biblical Precedent for “Dating”

• There is no evidence in the Hebrew TaNaKh of “dating” as modern Christians define it. Instead, relationships were further arranged within Hebrew culture and a Torah-following framework.

• The notion of testing multiple relationships before marriage is foreign to biblical Israel.

If relationships were truly ordained by YaHuWaH, there would be no need for Christian dating websites, which rely on human effort rather than divine appointment. If YaHuWaH truly orchestrated every relationship or marriage, then logically, there would be no Christian relationships ending. This is because anything the God of Israel establishes is meant to endure and align with His divine purpose. However, the high rate of divorce among Christian and New Testament believers clearly suggests that many of these unions are formed by human choice rather than divine orchestration.

Divorce Among Christians Suggests Human Choice Over Divine Will

Despite claims that “God brought us together,” many Christian marriages fail:

• High Divorce Rates – Studies show that the divorce rate among Christians is comparable to that of non-Christians. If God truly arranged these marriages, they should be enduring.

• Unequal Yoking (2 Corinthians 6:14) – Many Christians enter marriages based on emotions, personal desires, societal expectations, and what they believe is divine orchestration.

• Influence of Free Will – Just because Christians and New Testament believers say that it’s “God’s plan, not mine” does not mean they are. Many choose their spouse based on personal preferences rather than what the God of Israel established for His people..

The Hebrew Scriptures do record a few unions where YaHuWaH directed, like Adam and Eve, and Isaac and Rebekah. These relationships (which became marriage) that YaHuWaH orchestrated were intended for the welfare of Israel as a nation, recognized as His firstborn and anointed son (Exodus 4:22-23 and Hosea 11:1), rather than for the benefit of individuals alone. In these few instances when YaHuWaH was involved, it was tied to His covenant with Israel, the preservation of His set-apart nation, and the fulfillment of His promises.

Other than those examples, it was the Hebrew community and familial structures in which unions happened. The TaNaKh teaches that Hebrew communities and familial structures played a significant role in solidifying relationships to ensure that foreign men and women, who could lead Israelites into idolatry, were not brought into the nation. This was a protective measure to maintain the spiritual purity and covenant faithfulness of Israel.

1. Preventing Idolatry Through Relationship Restrictions

The Torah explicitly warns against marrying foreign spouses because of their potential to turn Israel’s heart away from YaHuWaH and His Torah:

• Deuteronomy 7:3-4 – “Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. For they will turn away thy son from following Me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of YaHuWaH be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly.”

• This command was not about ethnicity or race, but about loyalty to YaHuWaH, as foreign nations worshipped various false deities and people as saviors.

• 1 Kings 11:1-4 – Solomon’s foreign wives led him into idolatry, fulfilling the very warning in the Torah. His heart turned from YaHuWaH due to these unions.

• Nehemiah 13:23-27 – Nehemiah rebuked the Israelites for marrying foreign women, using Solomon as an example of how dangerous it was.

2. The Role of Families and Communities in Marriage

Unlike Western marriages, Hebrew unions were not left entirely to individual desires but were structured within family and tribal frameworks:

• Parental Involvement – Fathers often arranged marriages to ensure unions remained within the covenant community (e.g., Abraham sending his servant to find a wife for Isaac in Genesis 24).

• Tribal Considerations – Marriages were often within the same tribe to preserve inheritance rights (e.g., the daughters of Zelophehad in Numbers 36:6-9).

• Community Approval – In some cases, elders or community leaders played a role in approving unions to ensure they aligned with Torah principles.

3. Did Hebrews Have a Choice Based on Attraction?

While relationships were largely finalized by the families, attraction and personal choice were still factors:

• Genesis 29:18-20 – Jacob loved Rachel and willingly worked for her, showing that love and attraction played a role in some unions.

• Song of Solomon – This book celebrates romance and desire within a proper marriage, indicating that attraction was acknowledged.

Conclusion

Hebrew communities structured their relationships to maintain covenant faithfulness with YaHuWaH and prevent idol worship. While personal choice and attraction were factors, they operated within a framework that prioritized faithfulness to YaHuWaH, His Torah, and the well-being of Israel as a nation. If this Christian thought process were true, the idea of specially seeking a parnter through dating apps or meeting people in a bar or at a club, implies a lack of faith in god’s ability to bring the right person into one’s life naturally, which raises the question: Are New Teatment followers truly trusting in their gods timing, or are they taking matters into their own hands?

This is not to say that relationships that begin through dating apps, in a bar, or at a club cannot be successful, as all relationships require effort from both partners. Research indicates that many relationships involving non-religious individuals or those who do not adhere to New Testament beliefs are successful and thriving, even outlasting New Testament-based relationships. However, contrary to common Christian conditioning, a successful relationship does not automatically mean it was orchestrated by divine favor. The Christian theory that "God ordains relationships" but then "hardens hearts" when things go wrong or not as one desires does not align with the Hebrew Bible. Instead, the Hebrew Scriptures emphasize free will, personal responsibility, and the unchanging justice of YaHuWaH. Relationship outcomes are based on human choices, not divine manipulation.

QUESTION: Why do Christians who claim the Hebrew Bible is the foundation of their religion still get tattoos, symbols, and marks of worship on their skin? What are your thoughts?

ANSWER: Great question! As we've mentioned many times, our opinion doesn’t matter. However, since you asked, we believe this is a personal choice. If someone chooses to follow the God of Israel and His Torah, that is one path. If they choose to follow the New Testament and the teachings of Jesus, Yeshua, YaHaWaShi, YaHuWShuWA, etc., that is another. One thing we know for certain is that we are all given free will, and the God of Israel permits deception as a test to see whether one’s heart will remain faithful to His commandments or not (Deuteronomy 8:2 and Judges 3:1-4).

That being said, this is just another classic case of Christians adopting practices and customs simply because their family, friends, loved ones, or those who they look up to are doing it. With 200 Christian variants/denominations in the U.S. and a staggering 45,000 worldwide, it is no wonder why this very popular, enabling, emotion-driven, and Torah-compromising facet of religion still dominates today. With that said, many assume, "All these people can’t be wrong," rather than questioning whether the practice aligns with the Hebrew Torah (their said foundation) or if they are simply following the crowd. What we can do is provide a balanced perspective on what the God of Israel says about marking and tattooing. So what do we know?

historically

Tattoos historically served multiple purposes, including marking ownership, disgrace, and or signifying religious devotion. Here are some key historical contexts where tattoos were used to show ownership or religious allegiance:

1. stigmatize(v.) 1580s, "to mark with a brand or tattoo," from Medieval Latin stigmatizare, from Greek stigmatizein, from stigmat-, stem of stigma (see stigma). The meaning "to blemish, set the mark of disgrace upon" is from the 1610s (figurative), and 1630s (literal). Related: Stigmatized; stigmatizing.

2. stigma(n.) 1590s (earlier stigme, c. 1400), "mark made on skin by burning with a hot iron," from Latin stigma (plural stigmata), from Greek stigma (genitive stigmatos) "mark of a pointed instrument, puncture, tattoo-mark, brand," which is related to stizein "to mark, tattoo" (from PIE root *steig- "to stick; pointed" (see stick (v.)). The figurative meaning "mark of disgrace or infamy which attaches to a person on account of evil conduct" in English is from the 1610s. Stigmas "marks resembling the wounds on the body of Christ, appearing supernaturally on the bodies of the devout" is from the 1630s; earlier stigmate (late 14c.), from Latin stigmata, itself used in English in this sense by 1630s.

3. tattoo(n.2) "pigment design inlaid under the skin," 1769 (noun and verb, both first attested in writing of Capt. Cook), from a Polynesian noun (such as Tahitian and Samoan tatau, Marquesan tatu "puncture, mark made on skin").

4. Century Dictionary (1902) describes marks or tattoos found on sailors and uncivilized people or as a sentence of punishment. Earlier names in English included Jerusalem cross (1690s) in reference to tattoos on the arms of pilgrims to the Holy Land, also Jerusalem letters (1760).

5. Some ancient Egyptian women, particularly those from the New Kingdom period (c. 1550–1070 BCE), had tattoos on their lower backs and thighs. These tattoos were believed to have had symbolic purposes, potentially related to fertility, childbirth, or protection during pregnancy. Archaeological discoveries, including the mummies of women with tattoos, show various designs, including dots, lines, and more intricate patterns on the lower abdomen, thighs, and lower back. Scholars believe these tattoos may have had apotropaic (protective) functions, offering spiritual protection during pregnancy and childbirth. One notable example is the tattooed mummy of Amunet, a priestess from the 18th dynasty, who had tattoos on her thighs and abdomen, which might have been linked to fertility rituals or symbols for childbirth. Citation: Dunham, D. (1996). "Tattooed Women in Ancient Egypt: A Preliminary Investigation." Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 82, 181-193.

6. "Tramp Stamp" originated in the late 1990s and early 2000s as a derogatory term for a tattoo on a woman's lower back. However the British call it a "slag tag".

1. Tattoos as a Mark of Ownership (Slavery & Servitude)

• In many ancient cultures, tattoos were used to mark slaves and servants to indicate who they belonged to.

• The ancient Greeks and Romans tattooed slaves and criminals to signify their status.

• In some cases, soldiers were tattooed to show loyalty to a specific military unit or ruler.

2. Tattoos as a Mark of Religious Allegiance

• Many pagan religions used tattoos to show devotion to their gods.

• Ancient Egyptians tattooed symbols of their deities onto their bodies as an act of worship and protection.

• Some Babylonians, Canaanites, and other pagan cultures marked themselves with symbols representing their gods.

• In contrast, the Torah forbids Israel from such practices, as seen in Leviticus 19:28, because tattooing was associated with idol worship and mourning rituals for the dead.

3. Tattoos in Pagan Rituals & Mourning the Dead

• Many ancient civilizations, including the Egyptians and Mesopotamians, cut or tattooed their skin in mourning rituals for the dead.

• The Torah’s prohibition of tattooing may be directly linked to this, as YaHuWaH commanded Israel to be set apart from pagan customs.

4. Modern Adoption of Christianity

• Since Christianity has absorbed many pagan customs over time, tattooing has become widely accepted.

• Many Christians today see tattoos as "personal expression" or "faith declarations," even though the practice originated in idolatry and servitude—contrary to the Torah's command.

• The irony is that some Christians even get Hebrew tattoos while simultaneously claiming that Hebrew and the Torah no longer matter.

WHAT DOES the TORAH teach

1. Torah Prohibition (Leviticus 19:28) – The Hebrew Torah explicitly forbids tattoos and body markings, especially in the context of mourning for the dead:
   “You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor tattoo any marks on you: I am YaHuWaH.” (Leviticus 19:28)
   This command was given to Israel as part of YaHuWaH’s instructions to keep them separate from pagan nations that practiced self-mutilation and tattooing in religious or mourning rituals.

   2. Christian Adoption of Tattoos – Many Christians argue that they are under a "new covenant" and no longer bound by the Torah’s laws. This belief, largely influenced by Paul’s writings, leads many to selectively disregard laws like Leviticus 19:28 while still holding onto other Hebrew Bible teachings when convenient. This selective adherence is why some Christians get tattoos while still claiming the Hebrew Bible as their foundation.

   3. Cultural vs. Theological Justification – The acceptance of tattoos in Christianity is also a result of shifting cultural norms. Modern Christian teachings often focus more on personal faith rather than strict obedience to laws. However, this contradicts YaHuWaH’s consistent message in the Hebrew Bible that obedience to His commandments is a sign of true faith.
   
   

Early Christian Views on Old Testament Laws

Early Christian perspectives on the applicability of Old Testament laws, including prohibitions like those against tattoos, varied and evolved over time. In the nascent Christian community, debates arose regarding the relevance of Mosaic Law for Gentile converts. The Jerusalem Council, as recorded in Acts 15, addressed this by determining that Gentile believers were not obligated to observe the entirety of the Mosaic Law, focusing instead on a few essential requirements. This decision marked a pivotal shift, indicating that adherence to Old Testament laws was not mandatory for all Christians.

The Apostle Paul further articulated this stance, emphasizing that righteousness comes through faith in Christ rather than through the works of the Law. In his letters, he often highlighted the distinction between living under the Law and living under grace, suggesting that the coming of Christ fulfilled the Law's requirements.

Early Christian Practices Regarding Tattoos

The specific practice of tattooing was addressed differently across various contexts in early Christianity. While Leviticus 19:28 explicitly forbids tattoos, this command was part of the broader Mosaic Law. As the early church grappled with the applicability of these laws, cultural and societal factors also influenced their views.

In the Roman Empire, tattoos were often associated with slavery and punishment. Some early Christians reportedly received tattoos as a form of persecution, marking them as criminals in the eyes of Roman authorities. However, there is limited evidence to suggest that early Christians voluntarily received tattoos as a form of religious expression.

Contemporary Christian Perspectives

Today, many Christians view the Old Testament laws through the lens of the New Covenant established by Jesus. This perspective often leads to the belief that ceremonial and cultural laws, such as the prohibition against tattoos, are no longer binding. Instead, emphasis is placed on the moral teachings of the Old Testament that are reaffirmed in the New Testament.

This theological shift, combined with changing cultural attitudes, has resulted in a more accepting view of tattoos within many Christian communities. The early Christian approach to Old Testament laws was characterized by a move away from strict adherence, focusing instead on the principles of faith and grace. This evolution in understanding has influenced contemporary Christian practices, including the acceptance of tattoos as a form of personal and spiritual expression.

Many Christians today also justify getting tattoos because they see other Christians doing it and condoning it. This normalization creates a cycle where cultural acceptance overrides biblical prohibitions. Instead of evaluating the practice based on the desire of the Creator, they follow what is common within their religious circles.

Furthermore, Christianity has historically absorbed many pagan customs, blending them into its practices under a new religious framework. This is evident in holidays like Christmas and Easter, which incorporate customs from pre-Christian pagan festivals. Given this pattern, it is not surprising that tattooing—historically a pagan practice—has been embraced within Christianity as well, thus it is a pagan religion.

Since Christianity itself has roots in merging different traditions, many of its followers naturally continue adopting pagan customs while believing they are honoring their faith. Tattoos, once seen as a mark of pagan rituals, have now been rebranded as symbols of personal faith in Christian circles, despite the Torah’s clear prohibition.

pagan integrations

The integration of pagan customs into early Christian practices is a well-documented historical fact. This blending often aimed to facilitate the transition of pagan converts to Christianity by incorporating familiar elements into Christian worship. Here are some notable examples:

1. Adoption of Pagan Festivals

• Christmas (December 25): The selection of December 25 as the date to celebrate the birth of Jesus is believed to coincide with the Roman festival Dies Natalis Solis Invicti (Birthday of the Unconquered Sun), a festival instituted by Emperor Aurelian in AD 274. This date also aligns with the winter solstice, a time of various pagan celebrations. Encyclopedia Britannica

  
  

• Easter: The term "Easter" itself is thought to derive from Eostre, a Germanic pagan goddess associated with spring and fertility. The timing of the Christian celebration of the resurrection of Jesus coincides with pre-existing spring festivals that celebrated renewal and rebirth. Encyclopedia Britannica

2. Transformation of Pagan Temples

As Christianity gained prominence within the Roman Empire, many pagan temples were repurposed into Christian churches. This practice not only provided ready-made worship spaces but also symbolized the triumph of Christianity over pagan religions. For instance, the Pantheon in Rome, originally dedicated to all Roman gods, was consecrated as a Christian church in the 7th century. Encyclopedia Britannica

3. Incorporation of Pagan Symbols and Rituals

• Holy Water and Relics: The use of holy water and veneration of relics in Christian rituals may have parallels with pagan practices. Scholars suggest that these elements were integrated into Christian worship to provide converts with familiar rites, thereby easing their transition from paganism to Christianity. atheistscholar.org

  
  

• Festive Traditions: Certain customs associated with Christian holidays, such as decorating with greenery during Christmas or lighting bonfires during Easter, have roots in pagan traditions that celebrate nature and seasonal cycles.

FINAL THOUGHTS

While early Christian leaders often sought to distinguish their practices from paganism, the blending of various pagan traditions was employed as a cynical approach to conversion and cultural integration. This blending made it easier for converts and recruits to transition, thereby aiding the spread of Christianity across diverse cultures.

Historical research teaches us that tattooing or marking the skin did not originate with the Hebrews. Tattooing has a long history that predates the Hebrews and was practiced in various ancient pagan cultures, including those in Egypt, Mesopotamia, and the Indus Valley, as well as among other ancient peoples.

The Israelites, as described in the Hebrew Torah (specifically in Leviticus 19:28), were explicitly forbidden from tattooing or marking their bodies in the way that some other ancient cultures practiced. The verse states:

"Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am YaHuWaH." (Leviticus 19:28)

This prohibition reflects the unique identity of the Hebrews as a people set apart by their covenant with YaHuWaH, as well as the influence of surrounding cultures where tattoos were often linked to religious rituals, deities, or personal identity. The ancient Egyptians, for instance, practiced tattooing, as did various other groups, but the practice was not part of Hebrew tradition or law.

Although tattooing was not a practice originating with the Hebrews, it was very common in many other ancient societies. The Hebrews were instructed to avoid it in order to maintain their distinct cultural covenant with the God of Israel. Ultimately, the practice of Christians getting tattoos, including Hebrew ones, highlights a deeper issue of selectively following parts of the Hebrew Bible to please others and oneself, while disregarding the authority of the Torah.

In Ecclesiastes 1:9, Solomon reflects on the repetitive nature of human behavior throughout history:

"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun." (Ecclesiastes 1:9, KJV)

This insight suggests that human tendencies to repeat practices from the past continue to manifest in new forms. As you pointed out, modern Christians often mark their skin with tattoos of symbols like the cross, Jesus, praying hands, thorns, and stakes/nails to signify their faith and allegiance to the deity they worship. In doing so, they follow a pattern similar to the ancient pagans, who marked their bodies to symbolize their devotion to various gods.

The Hebrew Bible does indeed warn against the creation and veneration of images, idols, or objects of worship. For example:

• Exodus 20:4-5: “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or on the earth beneath, or in the waters under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them...” (KJV)

• Deuteronomy 4:15-24: “Take ye therefore good heed unto yourselves; for ye saw no manner of similitude on the day that YaHuWaH spake unto you in Horeb out of the midst of the fire: Lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the similitude of any figure, the likeness of male or female, Take heed unto yourselves, lest ye forget the covenant of YaHuWaH your God, which He made with you, and make you a graven image, or the likeness of anything, which YaHuWaH thy God hath forbidden thee.” (KJV)

• Deuteronomy 5:8-9: “Thou shalt not bow down thyself unto them, nor serve them: for I YaHuWaH thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me” (KJV)

These passages (and many others) emphasize the prohibition against creating any physical representations of a divine, which aligns with the broader Hebrew understanding that worship should be directed solely to YaHuWaH, without reliance on tangible representations or intermediaries. These passages prohibit the creation and veneration of physical representations, such as carved images or likenesses of anything in the heavens, on the earth, or in the waters beneath the earth. These prohibitions are rooted in the principle that the God of Israel (YaHuWaH) is to be worshipped without relying on physical objects, images to represent Him, or intermediaries.

Marking one's skin with images of a deity, religious symbols (such as crosses), a male, female, animal, object, symbol, or other representations of worship, or honor of the dead is seen as a form of creating and venerating a physical likeness (idol worship). In the context of the Hebrew Torah, such actions could inadvertently elevate these images to a place of spiritual significance or worship, which contradicts the command to avoid idolatry.

The Hebrew understanding of idolatry extends beyond just the physical worship of idols—it also includes any attempt to represent or symbolize any deity or honor of the dead in a way that could detract from the pure and sole worship of YaHuWaH. Therefore, tattooing one's body with images of people or symbols tied to worship, or honor of the dead is seen as violating these commandments, as it involves marking the body with representations that could be perceived as objects of reverence or worship.

QUESTION: Over the past several years, I've noticed many Christians getting Yeshua or Hebrew tattoos. For centuries, Christians insisted on the name Jesus and that Hebrew no longer matters. Can you explain the surprising shift?

ANSWER: The name Jesus has been in use for approximately 400–500 years in its modern English form. The earliest English translations of the Bible, such as William Tyndale’s New Testament (1526), still used variations like Iesus, which was derived from Latin. The shift to Jesus with the "J" pronunciation became more widespread in English after the 1611 King James Version of the Westernized Bible was published. In the original 1611 King James Version (KJV) of the Bible, the letter I was used in place of J. For example, the name we now see as Jesus was written as Iesus, and John was written as Iohn. This is because, at the time, the letter J did not yet exist as a distinct letter in the English alphabet—it was simply a variant of I used in certain contexts, particularly at the beginning of words (see Gian Giorgio Trissino).

The modern differentiation between I and J as separate letters developed gradually over the 16th and 17th centuries, and by the time later editions of the KJV were printed, the J became standard in English, leading to the spelling Jesus as we see it today. Historically, the name traces back to the Greek Iēsous (Ἰησοῦς), which itself was a Hellenized form of the Hebrew YeHuWShA (יהושע) or its shortened form YeShuWA (ישוע). The Latin Iesus was the standard form used in the Roman Catholic Church for centuries before English speakers adopted Jesus. However, the letter “J” did not exist in English until around the 16th century, meaning that prior to that time, no one pronounced the name Jesus the way it is commonly said today. The letter 'J' and its corresponding sound never existed in the ancient or modern Hebrew language, and it was the last letter added to the English alphabet in 1524 (see Dictionary).

WHY THE BIG SHIFT?

In today’s digital age, access to information that was once buried in libraries or restricted to academic study is now widely available, allowing people to uncover historical and linguistic truths that were previously overlooked. As a result, many Christians are beginning to recognize that the name Jesus could never have been a Hebrew name, as the Hebrew language has no letter "J." Instead, Jesus is a later Greek and Latin transliteration, far removed from the original linguistic and cultural context of the Hebrew Scriptures.

This growing awareness has led many Christians to embrace YeShuWA—a name they see as a more authentic representation of the Hebrew name. Some, in an effort to reconnect with what they now see as the true roots of Christianity, have even begun getting YeShuWA tattoos as a symbolic gesture of their sudden shift in understanding. While this step does not yet fully reconcile the deeper theological differences between Christianity and the Hebrew culture, it reflects a significant awakening—one that acknowledges the foundational role the Hebrew Torah has on Christianity and signals a reexamination of long-held Christian traditions and pagan customs.

However, while YeShuWA is a Hebrew name, the Christian New Testament messiah does not capture the true identity of the coming Messiah within the proper context of the Hebrew TaNaKh. The shift toward Christians now using YeShuWA, leaving churches, and stopping their participation in pagan holiday worship signifies a step toward questioning traditional Christian theology, including the Greco-Roman influences that shaped much of Christianity. This movement reflects a growing awareness of the need to reexamine Christian doctrine, its historical development, and its vast separation from the Hebrew roots.

Additionally, this shift reveals that many Christians are beginning to embrace aspects of the Hebrew Bible because they recognize that without its unchanging concepts, their religion could not exist. The Hebrew Scriptures provide the foundation for everything Christianity claims, from prophecy to moral law. As Christians acknowledge this, some are attempting to reconnect with the Hebrew origins of their faith—even if they do not yet fully grasp the implications of how Christian theology has deviated from the God of Israel’s Torah. The increasing use of YeShuWA is just one sign that this realization is growing, and it suggests that more people are beginning to question long-held Christian traditions in search of truth.

On the other hand, it is quite ironic that many Christians choose to get Hebrew tattoos—such as biblical verses or Hebrew lettering—while simultaneously claiming that the Hebrew Bible and culture are no longer relevant because YeShuWA supposedly fulfilled the Torah on the cross. This is often due to the romanticization of the Hebrew language and culture while simultaneously dismissing the actual Torah commandments that the Hebrew people followed. Some may view Hebrew tattoos as a way to connect their Christian beliefs to its origins, however unaware that such a practice contradicts the Torah they claim to respect.

We have been emphasizing since 2017 that, whether people accept it or not, believe it or not, or trust it or not, Christianity is entirely dependent on the unchanging and sacred word of the God of Israel as found in the Hebrew Bible. There is no way around this fact. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate all New Testament claims against the ultimate authority—the unchanging commandments of the God of Israel.

For a more in-depth exploration of the topic of tattoos and their relevance to Western culture, consider becoming a WOTR member. Membership grants you exclusive access to the complete context of this subject, full-length videos, over 250 pages of content, scholarly resources, downloadable study guides for adults and children, and much more to enhance your learning experience.

QUESTION: After studying the unchanging Torah and researching the information on your website for several months, I have decided to leave the church. Because I choose to obey the Torah, those who once claimed to love me—Christians, along with my friends and family—now say that the devil has taken hold of me and that his demons will come after me. Can you provide clarity on this?

ANSWER: First and foremost, we want to commend you for your dedication to studying the unchanging Torah and seeking the truth in the word of the God of Israel. Your experience is not unique—many of us at WOTR have encountered the same emotional responses from Christian friends and family when we decided to leave the church and follow the Torah as instructed by the God of Israel. Their reaction is often rooted in fear, misunderstanding, and deeply ingrained traditional doctrines rather than in a true study of what the Hebrew Bible actually teaches.

Does the God of Israel Create Demons or Evil?

That being said, let's see what the Hebrew Bible has to say and gain clarity from it, for true understanding comes from there. The Hebrew Bible does not support the Christian concept of demons or a devil as an independent entity warring against the Creator. Instead, it teaches that the God of Israel is sovereign over all things, including both good and what is perceived as "evil." In Isaiah 45:7, He declares:

"I form the light and create darkness; I make peace and create evil; I, YaHuWaH, do all these things."

This verse does not mean that He creates evil in a moral sense, but rather that He brings about calamity or judgment when necessary. This aligns with the Torah’s teachings that obedience brings blessings, while disobedience leads to consequences (Deuteronomy 28). The forces that test people—whether through hardship, temptation, or trials—are under His control, meant to refine and strengthen faithfulness, not to lead people astray arbitrarily. The Hebrew word RA‘ does not necessarily mean "moral evil" as understood in a Western or Christian sense. Instead, it often refers to calamity, disaster, hardship, or judgment—things that YaHuWaH uses to fulfill His purposes, including testing and disciplining Israel.

Understanding "Creating Evil" in Context

1. RA‘ Often Means Calamity, Not Sin

• Lamentations 3:38: "Out of the mouth of the Most High proceeds not both good and evil (RA‘)?"

• Amos 3:6: "Shall there be evil (RA‘) in a city, and YaHuWaH has not done it?"

• In these passages, ra‘ refers to disaster, judgment, or misfortune, not moral wrongdoing.

2. Allowing Circumstances That Lead to Choices

• YaHuWaH allows situations—blessings or hardships—that test people's faithfulness (Free Will).

• Deuteronomy 30:15-19: He sets before Israel "life and good, and death and evil" and commands them to choose life by obeying His Torah.

• Job 2:10: Job acknowledges, "Shall we receive good from YaHuWaH, and shall we not receive evil (RA‘)?"—again, meaning suffering, not moral wickedness.

3. Evil as a Form of Divine Judgment

• YaHuWaH Raises Up Adversaries:

  • Isaiah 10:5-6: Assyria is called "the rod of My anger," used to punish Israel.

  • Habakkuk 1:6: The Chaldeans (Babylonians) are raised up as a tool of judgment.

• 1 Kings 22:23: YaHuWaH permits a lying spirit to deceive Ahab as judgment.

Isaiah 45:7 reflects the God of Israel's sovereignty over all aspects of life, including peace and calamity. It indicates that the God of Israel is in control of both blessings and judgments, depending on how people choose to respond to His unchanging commands.

In the context of the Hebrew Torah, the commandments were given to guide the nation of Israel (not Christians) toward righteousness, justice, and peace. Obedience to the Torah, therefore, is seen as a way to align oneself with the God of Israel's will and avoid the negative consequences of disobedience, which can lead to hardship, punishment, or calamity.

Thus, if one chooses to obey the Torah, they are following the path of wisdom and divine protection, while neglecting it might lead to leaving their fate to chance and the potential consequences of disregarding the God of Israel's commands. This idea aligns with the broader themes in the Hebrew Bible, where obedience to the God of Israel's law (not the Torah or laws in the New Testament) is directly connected to blessings and protection, while disobedience often leads to suffering and judgment.

The Origin of the Christian Devil and Demons

The concept of an all-powerful devil opposing the Creator is foreign to the Hebrew Bible. The term "devil" is derived from the Greek diabolos, meaning "accuser" or "slanderer," and was influenced by Persian dualism from Zoroastrianism, where a cosmic battle exists between good and evil forces. This idea was later absorbed into Christianity. In contrast, the Hebrew Bible presents satan as an adversary or accuser, but always under the authority of the Creator (Job 1:6-12).

In Job 1:6-12, the "devil" (referred to by Christians, but is SaTaN in the Hebrew Bible) appears before the God of Israel and must ask for permission to test Job. Additionally, the God of Israel commands Satan not to take Job's life, demonstrating that Satan does not have autonomous power or equal authority over the God of Israel. This suggests that Satan, in the Christian understanding, is not an equal counterpart to YaHuWaH, but rather a subordinate being who operates within the boundaries set by the God of Israel. Therefore, if Satan were equal to YaHuWaH, he would not need to ask for permission or be limited by the God of Israel's commands.

The Christian perception that demons will actively hunt down those who leave the church or deny Jesus to fully obey the Torah is a fear-based belief not found in the Hebrew Scriptures. Instead, it is often used as a control tactic to keep people from questioning church doctrines.

Our Experience Over the Past 14 Years

We at WOTR have walked this path for over 14 years, and contrary to what Christians have claimed, we have not experienced torment, curses, or demonic attacks. Instead, we have found:
✅ Peace – A deep and unshakable peace in knowing we are following the unchanging laws of the Creator of all things.
✅ Clarity – Understanding the Torah has removed confusion and contradictions that we once struggled with in Christian teachings.
✅ Knowledge & Wisdom – Studying the Torah in its original context has revealed profound truths that were hidden behind layers of man-made doctrines, hidden agendas, and personal interpretations.

If the warnings from Christians were true—that leaving the Christian religion and denying the New Testament demigod to follow the God of Israel as commanded through His Torah would lead to curses, destruction, or demonic oppression—then we would have been struck by lightning numerous times by now! Yet, due to following the Torah, our lives have been filled with blessings, strength, and a renewed sense of purpose (Ecclesiastes 12:1).

Why Are Christians Reacting This Way?

Their response is emotional rather than scriptural. The church has taught for centuries that anyone who does not follow its doctrines is in danger. Many Christians have been conditioned to view Torah observance as "legalism," "bondage," or something that was abolished or fulfilled when their New Testament Messiah died on the cross, rather than recognizing it as the unchanging foundation of the God of Israel (Deuteronomy 4:5-8). Their fear does not stem from the Torah itself but from taught church traditions regarding hell, demons, and punishment. The truth is, that the Torah is an eternal covenant between the God of Israel and His chosen people, the nation of Israel (His firstborn and anointed son)—not Christianity. According to the God of Israel, the Torah is perfect and never needs to be changed, added to, or taken away from (Deuteronomy 4:2, 12:32 and Proverbs 30:5-6).

Proverbs 30:5-6 "Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar."

Final Encouragement

Fear is a tactic that many religions use because it is highly effective in controlling beliefs and behaviors. The fear of demons, punishment, or spiritual attacks keeps people from questioning doctrines, often leading them to accept teachings without true examination. In Christianity, the idea that demons will torment those who leave the church creates an emotional barrier that discourages independent study and obedience to the Torah.

However, studying the Torah removes fear, misunderstanding, and personal interpretations. The instructions and guidance of the God of Israel are unchanging and cannot be altered by man or a demigod New Testament savior. By following the Torah, we find clarity, confidence, and true peace, knowing that we are walking in the ways of the Creator rather than the traditions of men.

Do not let the fear of others shake your trust. The God of Israel is the one who blesses and protects those who walk in HIS ways, not Christian ways (Psalm 119:1-2). As you continue on this path, you will see the truth for yourself—not through fear, but through wisdom and understanding.

Stay strong, keep studying, and trust in the unchanging word of the Creator. You are not alone. For a more comprehensive study and scholarly resources on how Zoroastrianism influenced the development of the belief in demons and evil spirits in religious traditions like Christianity, consider becoming a WOTR member. You'll gain access to our full-length videos, scholarly resources, downloadable study guides for both adults and children and much more.

QUESTION: Countless marriage books and seminars rooted in the New Testament have gained massive popularity, yet the divorce rate remains alarmingly high. So why do people keep turning to those books, while ignoring THE book—the Hebrew Torah, where the Creator Himself laid out the original blueprint for marriage?

ANSWER: Great question—and it gets to the heart of a much deeper issue. We’ve said it time and time again—countless people claim their marriage or relationship was ordained by God, divinely orchestrated, or heaven-sent. Whether they invoke the name of YaHuWaH or claim it was 'Jesus-approved,' the reality remains: most of these unions still fall apart. Estimates show that over the last 10 years, approximately 3.675 million Christian marriages have ended in divorce. Does this mean the Most High rescued these individuals from a lifetime of hardship with the wrong spouse that He ordained them, or are they just experiencing the consequences of choices made outside His instruction (see puppet master)?

While “The 5 Love Languages” by Dr. Gary Chapman has helped many Christian couples by offering emotional insight and communication tools, it is ultimately a man-made framework rooted in psychology, not the Torah. Its focus is on meeting each other's emotional needs to sustain a relationship. In contrast, the Hebrew Torah presents marriage as a divinely established covenant with clearly defined roles, responsibilities, and moral boundaries. It emphasizes obedience to the God of Israel, not just emotional satisfaction. Love, according to Torah, is not a feeling to be managed—it’s faithful action, loyalty, and righteousness.

The popularity of books like Chapman’s reflects a culture that prioritizes personal happiness and emotional fulfillment, often at the expense of accountability, commitment, and spiritual order. The Torah, however, presents marriage as a sacred bond rooted in purpose, duty, and the fear of YaHuWaH. Ultimately, the Torah offers a permanent foundation, while modern models, though useful, often lack the spiritual authority and structure needed to sustain lifelong covenant relationships.

Since divorce is high in Western people continue turning to popular New Testament-based marriage books—even while the divorce rate climbs—because many have been conditioned to view the Hebrew Torah as obsolete, or only relevant to "Old Testament Jews." Modern Christian and New Testament teachings often emphasize grace over obedience, love over law, and personal fulfillment over divine order. As a result, many New Testament believers are taught that Jesus (Yeshua, YaHaWaHShi, YaHuWShuWA, etc.) "fulfilled" the Torah in such a way that they no longer need to follow its instructions, including its model for marriage.

These books, while well-meaning, often promote:

• Emotional compatibility over covenant structure

• Individual happiness over generational purpose

• Therapeutic language over obedience to divine laws

• Gender equality in roles over divine order and headship

The Hebrew Torah, however, presents marriage as a sacred covenant, not a contract or partnership based on fleeting emotions. It is:

• A functional system, where man leads and provides, and woman helps and builds the household, and both follow Torah

• Tied to nationhood, inheritance, and legacy, not just romantic companionship

• Governed by divine laws of purity, honor, responsibility, and tribal structure

When this original design is abandoned, chaos follows: confusion about roles, disconnection from purpose, and eventually, broken homes.

In short:
📖 People choose popular books because they validate feelings and emotions.
📜 The Torah doesn’t cater to emotions—it aligns them with the truth of the God of Israel.

Modern religion and Western mindset prioritize comfort over covenant, many would rather read what affirms them than obey what transforms them. From a Christian, New Testament-based perspective, and tends to emphasize practical, modern relationship advice grounded in biblical principles—but heavily filtered through a Westernized lens of love, partnership, and mutual compatibility. Let’s break down how his concept of marriage contrasts with how the God of Israel (YaHuWaH) established marriage in the Torah, and why New Testament believers accept these various New Testament approaches more readily than the Torah.

1. Concept of Marriage FROM NEW TESTAMENT AUTHORS:

Themes:

• Marriage is a partnership based on love, communication, mutual respect, and personal responsibility.

• It emphasizes emotions and romantic connection, often assuming both partners have equal say and shared roles.

• There is a strong individualist tone, where personal growth and mutual benefit are central.

• He warns that marriage isn’t for the “weak” or immature (hence the title), stressing personal commitment and maturity.

Underlying View:

• Marriage is a choice between two equal individuals.

• Christian love (agape), forgiveness, and New Testament Messiah-centered unity are central.

• The ultimate goal is personal and spiritual growth, with the New Testament Messiah as the foundation.

2. Marriage According to YaHuWaHs UNCHANGING Torah:

Structure:

• Marriage is a covenant, not a contract or romantic partnership.

• The man is the head of the household and holds responsibility for leading by example, following Torah, protecting, and providing.

• The woman is a helper and keeper of the home (Genesis 2:18; Proverbs 31), not as inferior, but in a functional hierarchy.

• It is not built on modern emotional shifts of feeling loved but on obedience to divine roles and instructions.

Purpose:

• To build up the nation of Israel by preserving lineage, Torah, land inheritance, and tribal identity.

• To produce seed (children) within the covenant (Malachi 2:15).

• The marriage reflects order, obedience, and holiness—a set-apart institution.

3. Key Contrasts:

4. Why New Testament Believers Accept THESE MARRIAGE BOOKS:

• Cultural Alignment: This view reflects modern Western ideals of love and equality, familiar and comfortable.

• NT messiah-Centered: By making Jesus, Yeshua, YaHaWaHShi, YaHuWShuWA the focal point, it aligns with mainstream Christian doctrine.

• Egalitarianism: Most NT believers reject “Old Testament patriarchy” in favor of mutual submission (a misapplication of Ephesians 5:21).

• Spiritual Over Literal: The New Testament spiritualizes marriage—seeing it as symbolic of Christ and the church—rather than a literal nation-building covenant.

These NT-based marriage books, while offering practical advice, reflect New Testament Christian culture, not ancient Hebrew covenant law. It softens and reinterprets divine roles, aligning with emotional and individualistic priorities rather than YaHuWaH’s national, tribal, and covenantal design. Torah-based marriage is not solely about mutual romantic satisfaction—it is about function, structure, obedience, and fruitfulness for the nation of Israel. The popularity of these marriage books among NT believers highlights the Westernization of biblical concepts, where Torah instructions are sidelined in favor of culturally comfortable teachings.

Conclusion:

Even among those who call on YaHuWaH, modern marriage concepts take front seat over the Torah's model of marriage for several key reasons, most of which stem from a cultural and religious shift away from the divine structure of YaHuWaH and toward human-centered ideals.

Here’s a breakdown of why:

📉 1. Torah Is Viewed as “Old” or “Irrelevant”

• Many are taught that the Torah was "done away with" or "fulfilled" by the New Testament Messiah.

• As a result, people ignore its instructions, thinking they no longer apply—including those about marriage, family, gender roles, and inheritance.

🧠 2. Culture Promotes Individualism Over Order

• Modern society teaches that marriage should make you happy, instead of making you set apart or fruitful. Happy wife, happy life. When momma bear is happy, the home is happy.

• Torah marriage is about structure, Torah obedience, and purpose, not about solely emotional satisfaction or romantic compatibility.

♀️♂️ 3. Rejection of Divine Roles

• The Torah defines clear gender roles: the man as leader and provider, the woman as helper and builder of the home, and both are to follow Torah, not New Testament concepts that contradict the God of Israel.

• Modern concepts often push for “equality” that cancels out roles, which seems more appealing to a society that sees submission or headship as outdated or oppressive. However, the roles of the man and woman are critical and integral parts of how the God of Israel established marriage from the beginning.

📚 4. Christian Books Feel “Easier” and More Emotionally Uplifting

• New Testament-based books often emphasize forgiveness, love, grace, and communication—all good things, but often disconnected from Torah-based accountability and covenantal purpose.

• People prefer messages that are emotion-driven and inspiring over instructive.

💔 5. Most People Don't Know the Torah’s Marriage Model

• There’s a lack of teaching and awareness. Even many don’t realize that the Torah outlines marriage law, inheritance, sexual boundaries, and family order.

• Without that knowledge, they turn to the only thing available—popular books, charismatic sermons, New Testament, and modern advice.

🏛️ 6. Western marriages are built on Roman, not Hebrew, Foundations

• Much of Western Christianity absorbed Roman values, which emphasize individualism, social status, and man-made doctrine.

• The Hebrew worldview, rooted in tribe, obedience, and covenant, was left behind in favor of a more “universal” message.

🔄 7. Torah Requires Accountability—Modern Marriage Does Not

• Torah-based marriage is not just about feelings; it’s about obedience to a system higher than yourself.

• That kind of accountability is uncomfortable for a generation raised to prioritize self-expression, emotional desire, and autonomy.

• Western Marriage: “If it doesn’t work, just divorce and try again.”

  This mindset treats marriage as a contract based on:

  • Personal happiness

  • Emotional satisfaction

  • Convenience

  If these things disappear—or if conflict arises—New Testament believers are told that:

“It’s okay to walk away. You deserve better. Start fresh with someone else.”

This is rooted in individualism, where the self is the highest authority. Love becomes conditional. Commitment becomes optional. Vows are breakable. Even in many Christian circles, remarriage after divorce is normalized, and multiple marriages are seen as acceptable, even when their Messiah warned against it (Matthew 19:3–9).

📜 8.Torah: Marriage is a Covenant, Not a Contract

In contrast, the Torah teaches that marriage is a covenant before YaHuWaH, sealed by commitment and responsibility, not convenience or for eternal emotional fulfillment.

Key Features of Torah-Based Marriage:

• Permanent union (Genesis 2:24 – “the two shall become one flesh”)

• Not easily dissolved (Deuteronomy 24:1–4 restricts divorce, and remarriage is discouraged if the woman remarries someone else)

• Rooted in purpose and legacy, not just romantic love

• Male leadership and responsibility to care for and cover his wife

• Divorce is allowed under specific situations, but it is not encouraged, and it comes with consequences

🔥 Summary:

🔥 Key Torah References:

• Genesis 2:24 – Marriage joins a man and a woman.

• Malachi 2:16 – “YaHuWaH hates divorce,” especially when it’s done treacherously.

• Deuteronomy 24:1–4 – If a man divorces his wife, and she marries another, he cannot take her back even if the second marriage ends. This prevents casual cycling of partners.

• Exodus 21:10–11 – Husbands are commanded to walk in Torah, provide food, clothing, and marital rights; failure to do so justifies separation, not emotional dissatisfaction.

🔍 Why This Matters:

When marriage is treated casually, generational damage follows—broken homes, confused children, unstable families, and spiritual disorder. The Torah model protects the household and prioritizes generational blessing over temporary emotion. The Western model promotes freedom of choice; the Torah promotes freedom through obedience.

FINAL THOUGHT:

Simply put, most marriages fail because they’re built on a blueprint that doesn’t come from the God of Israel. The results speak for themselves—many are on their third, fourth, or even fifth marriage, still searching for stability outside of His design. Many enter marriage with differing intentions—some rooted in subtle manipulation, others in the desire to gain control over time. While it's possible for marriages outside the framework of the Torah to function for a season, they often lack a lasting foundation. In contrast, the Torah offers a timeless and eternal blueprint. When both individuals willingly submit to the authority of the God of Israel and apply His timeless and established design for marriage, the union is built on unshakable ground, and success is no longer left to chance. Modern New Testament marriage concepts are popular because they allow people to feel spiritual without having to submit to the Creator’s structure. The Torah isn’t less relevant—it’s just less comfortable for a society that no longer fears or honors divine order, but self.

QUESTION: If New Testament followers believe that marriage is ordained and meant to be for life, why is there such hypocrisy in the church regarding adultery and among New Testament communities when it comes to divorce?

ANSWER: As we mentioned before, if the Creator orchestrates marriages, there should be no adultery and certainly no divorce (Deuteronomy 32:4, Psalm 18:30, Psalm 111:7-8, Numbers 23:19). Coming from a vast background within Christianity, since a young age, we have seen firsthand so many Christian marriages fail. Imagine the psychological effect it has on young preteens being told that God is with you, yet pillars of your church family are seen divorced.

When children witness prominent figures in their church community—pastors, deacons, long-time married couples—going through painful divorces, it creates cognitive dissonance. In other words, they struggle to reconcile what they’ve been taught (that God blesses and sustains marriages) with what they see (continual Christian marriages falling apart even among the most devout believers).

However, to your point about the reality between New Testament teachings on adultery and how it is handled within many New Testament communities. Many New Testament followers divorce, then have sexual relations with various people, and remarry multiple times, yet they are often welcomed back into the congregation with open arms, despite the New Testament's clear stance on the sanctity of marriage. How do churches justify this contradiction between their New Testament teachings on divorce and the reality of how it is handled within the church community? Christianity, particularly in traditional and conservative teachings, strongly condemns adultery. Many cite passages like Exodus 20:14 ("You shall not commit adultery") and Matthew 5:27-28, in the New Testament, where their New Testament messiah expands the definition of adultery to include even lustful thoughts.

🔹 What does the Torah teach regarding lustful thoughts?

In the Torah (i.e., the instructions given by YaHuWaH to Moses), adultery is clearly defined as:

• A physical act of sexual relations with another person’s spouse, punishable by death (Exodus 20:14, Leviticus 20:10).

• Sin is judged based on actions, not fleeting thoughts or internal temptations.

🔹 Relevant Verses:

• Exodus 20:14 – “You shall not commit adultery.”

• Leviticus 20:10 – Adultery is a relational act, a breach of covenant, not a thought.

• Genesis 4:7 – “Sin is crouching at the door; its desire is for you, but you must rule over it.”

  This verse illustrates that desire (temptation) exists, but you are responsible for not letting it master you.

🔹 Desire, including sexual desire, was created by the God of Israel.

It is not inherently sinful. Sexual desire (lust in its neutral form) was designed by YaHuWaH for a purpose: to draw a man and woman together within the covenant of marriage.

• Lust becomes sin when it is entertained outside of the covenant.
  The problem is not desire—it’s what we do with it. Lust becomes destructive when:

  • It's fed by fantasy, pornography, or idolatry

  • It leads to adultery, fornication, or obsession

  • It dishonors the covenant boundaries set by the Torah

🔹 Summary:

• YaHuWaH created sexual desire—it’s good when managed within His design.

• Lust is not sin unless acted upon or entertained wrongly.

• The Torah teaches mastery, not suppression, of desire.

• Unlike some religious teachings that frame lust as evil itself, the Torah distinguishes between desire and action, allowing room for growth, self-discipline, and healthy love within marriage.

The Hypocrisy in Practice

Despite this strict stance, as you've observed, many churches welcome back individuals who repeatedly engage in adultery, even when there is no clear evidence of repentance or change in behavior. This raises questions about double standards, selective enforcement, and the real consequences of adultery among New Testament followers.

Here are some key factors behind this perceived hypocrisy:

1. Grace vs. Accountability
   Many churches emphasize grace and forgiveness over accountability. The idea is that the New Testament messiah forgave sinners, so the church should also forgive and welcome back those who have fallen. However, this often happens without requiring genuine repentance or behavioral change, leading to a cycle where adultery is condemned in words but tolerated in practice. This ideology is detrimental because it removes all accountability. This non-Torah doctrine promoted in many churches causes followers to believe that each day is a new day in Jesus, leading them to think they can continue in an adulterous lifestyle without fear of repercussions or a lifestyle change. They are conditioned to believe that Jesus is constantly advocating for them, so there is no need for true repentance or change. With this ideology of grace over accountability, many churches create a cycle where adultery and other sins are tolerated, despite being condemned in words.

2. Selective Judgment
   Some churches take a harsh stance on certain sins (e.g., homosexuality, abortion) but are more lenient when it comes to adultery, particularly if the offender is influential or well-liked in the congregation. This selective judgment creates an environment where some sins are excused while others are met with severe condemnation.

3. Pastoral Complicity
   Many cases exist where pastors themselves have been caught in adulterous relationships but remain in leadership positions. If a pastor is guilty of the same sin, it sets a precedent for members to also continue in adultery without fear of real consequences.

4. Cultural Shifts & Divorce Rates
   Although Christianity traditionally teaches "one wife for life," modern churches have increasingly tolerated divorce and remarriage, often without biblical justification. Many Christians engage in serial monogamy (marrying, divorcing, and remarrying multiple times), which could still be considered adultery according to New Testament teachings.

5. The Role of Tithes & Membership
   Some churches operate like businesses, where membership numbers and financial contributions take precedence over moral integrity. If an adulterous member is a major donor or a well-connected individual, church leaders may avoid confronting them to keep attendance and financial support stable.

Does Christianity Really Teach "One Wife for Life"?

Christianity teaches lifelong monogamy (Matthew 19:6, 1 Corinthians 7:10-11). However, as you pointed out, the reality is that for many professing Christians, it is different. Many Christians divorce, have relations with various people, and remarry multiple times, despite their New Testament explicitly stating that remarriage after divorce (except for sexual immorality) is adultery (Matthew 19:9). For Christians and New Testament followers, the act or acts of having sex before remarriage, is called living in continuous sin.

🔹 Sexual Relations Before Remarriage:

When a Christian woman divorces her husband and engages in sexual relations with other men before remarriage, this act is viewed in light of several New Testament teachings:

1. Sex outside of marriage is considered adultery or fornication:

   • 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 – “Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.”

     Sexual relations outside of marriage (whether it’s after divorce or before remarriage) are categorized as sin.

2. The Christian concept of “living in sin”:

   • If a woman divorces and then has sex with various men without being remarried in a Christian context, many Christian teachings would say that she is living in a continuous state of sin, as sexual relations outside of marriage would be seen as fornication or adultery.

   • 1 Thessalonians 4:3-5 – “For this is the will of God, your sanctification: that you abstain from sexual immorality; that each one of you know how to control his own body in holiness and honor, not in the passion of lust like the Gentiles who do not know God.”

🔹 Does Christianity Label This as “Living in Continuous Sin”?

In many Christian denominations, especially those with traditional views on marriage:

• Divorce, unless for specific biblical reasons (e.g., adultery), is often seen as a breach of covenant.

• Sex before remarriage would be viewed as fornication, a sin that, according to New Testament teachings, leads to spiritual separation unless repentance and reconciliation are pursued.

• This would likely be described as living in continuous sin if the individual is not repenting, acknowledging the sin, and seeking reconciliation with God.

Conclusion:

Based on the teachings from the New Testament outlined above, it's evident that many Christians today find themselves in this category. Yet, within Christian communities, they continue to embrace one another despite what their New Testament teaches as continuous sin or unrepentant sinners (1 Corinthians 5:11-13, 2 Thessalonians 3:6, 14-15, and Romans 16:17-18). This inconsistency is a significant form of hypocrisy. It stands as one of the primary reasons why Christianity is experiencing a rapid decline, as estimates say that by 2050, 100,000 churches could be closed in the US. There's a huge disconnect between how many Christians actually live and what they preach and post on social media.

This hypocrisy stems from a failure to enforce biblical standards consistently. Since there are 200+ New Testament denominations in the US and a staggering 45,000 worldwide, it is apparent that Christianity is emotion-driven and interpretive. While New Testament doctrine opposes adultery, churches often turn a blind eye when the offender is a beloved member, a major donor, or even a pastor, all in order to keep the peace and show the love of Jesus. However, according to the New Testament, if they truly embodied the love of their Messiah, they would not have committed adultery or sought a divorce in the first place. Going deeper, if their marriage had truly been ordained, it would have never reached the point of adultery or divorce.

According to their teacher in the New Testament, he strongly condemned adultery. In the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5:27-28), He taught that not only is committing adultery wrong, but even lustful thoughts about another person are equivalent to committing adultery in one's heart. The idea that even the New Testament Messiah (Jesus) never experienced a single lustful thought is, when examined realistically, difficult to reconcile—especially in light of what the Torah teaches about human nature. The Torah does not label natural desire or lustful thoughts as sin in themselves, but rather warns against acting upon them in ways that violate YaHuWaH’s commands. Lust and desire were created by the God of Israel as part of human nature, to be directed and managed within the boundaries of righteousness.

Framing any and every lustful thought as sin, as seen in certain New Testament interpretations (e.g., Matthew 5:28), can inadvertently lead individuals to feel inherently flawed or perpetually guilty, pushing them toward the idea of needing a savior just to feel adequate or worthy. In contrast, the Torah teaches self-governance, discipline, and accountability, acknowledging human impulses while providing guidance on how to control them rather than be condemned by them.

Regarding adultery, their messiah emphasized the sanctity of marriage and fidelity, and he upheld the commandment in Exodus 20:14 ("You shall not commit adultery"). Additionally, in John 8:3-11, when the woman caught in adultery was brought before their messiah, he did not condemn her but also told her, "Go, and sin no more," indicating his call for repentance and a change of lifestyle (stop sinning, which is to break a commandment of the God of Isreal). So even their teacher did not tolerate adultery and called for purity of both action and heart. The emphasis on forgiveness without true repentance and obedience leads to a cycle where people continue committing adultery without consequence.

Though the explicit connection between lust and adultery is more clearly stated in the New Testament, the Hebrew Bible lays the groundwork for the idea that one’s thoughts, desires, and intentions are critically important in maintaining purity and righteousness before the God of Israel. The Torah advises against allowing lustful thoughts to take root in the heart, highlighting the importance of controlling one’s desires and thoughts.

Proverbs 6:25 – “Do not lust in your heart after her beauty or let her captivate you with her eyes.”

The key idea here is about control and restraint. It's not necessarily the thought itself that's condemned, but rather letting that thought take root in your heart and mind, which could eventually lead to actions like adultery or other sinful behaviors like idolatry. Examples include worshiping or praying to an intermediary before the God of Israel, like Jesus, YeShuA, YaHuShA, YaHuWShuWA, YaHaWaShi, and many others. The verse emphasizes the danger of allowing lustful thoughts to linger and influence behavior. It's about not letting those thoughts become an obsession or something that you choose to entertain, which can then lead to sinful actions. In essence, while thoughts in themselves may not always be sinful, allowing them to control your desires or dictate your actions is what Proverbs warns against.

Divorce will continue to persist until people wholeheartedly return to the God of Israel alone, without relying on a mediator or intermediary, as commanded in the everlasting and unchanging Torah.

Deuteronomy 4:29-31

“But from there you will seek YaHuWaH your mighty one, and you will find Him if you search for Him with all your heart and all your soul. When you are in distress and all these things have come upon you, in the latter days you will return to YaHuWaH your mighty one and listen to His voice. For YaHuWaH your mighty one is a compassionate AL; He will not fail you nor destroy you nor forget the covenant with your fathers which He swore to them.”

✅ This passage highlights both the call and the promise—if Israel returns, He will receive them.

Deuteronomy 30:1-3

“So it shall be when all of these things have come upon you... and you call them to mind in all nations where YaHuWaH your mighty one has banished you, and you return to YaHuWaH your mighty one and obey Him with all your heart and soul... then YaHuWaH your mighty one will restore you from captivity and have compassion on you.”

✅ A direct call to return while in exile, and the promise of restoration if they obey His voice.

Leviticus 26:40-42

“If they confess their iniquity... and if their uncircumcised heart is humbled so that they make amends for their iniquity, then I will remember My covenant with Yaʿaqoḇ (Jacob), and also My covenant with Yitsḥaq (Isaac), and also My covenant with Aḇraham I will remember...”

✅ Repentance and return are tied to remembering the covenant and being restored.

📜 Isaiah (Yeshayahu) 55:6–7

“Seek YaHuWaH while He may be found; call upon Him while He is near. Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts; and let him return to YaHuWaH, and He will have compassion on him, and to our mighty one, for He will abundantly pardon.”

✅ A personal and national call to return, directly to YaHuWaH.

📜 Jeremiah (Yirmeyahu) 3:12–14

“Return, faithless Israel,” declares YaHuWaH. “I will not look upon you in anger. For I am gracious,” declares YaHuWaH... “Return, O faithless sons,” declares YaHuWaH, “For I am a master to you, and I will take you one from a city and two from a family, and I will bring you to Zion.”

✅ Even in faithlessness, YaHuWaH calls them to return—no mention of a mediator.

📜 Jeremiah 4:1

“If you will return, O Israel,” declares YaHuWaH, “then you should return to Me. And if you will put away your detested things from My presence, and will not waver...”

✅ Clear instruction to return to Him, not through another, not through religion, but to the covenant.

📜 Hosea (Hoshea) 14:1–2

“Return, O Israel, to YaHuWaH your mighty one, for you have stumbled because of your iniquity. Take words with you and return to YaHuWaH. Say to Him, ‘Take away all iniquity and receive us graciously, that we may present the fruit of our lips.’”

✅ The prophet gives Israel even the words to say when returning directly to their mighty one.

📜 Zechariah (Zekaryah) 1:3

“Therefore say to them, ‘Thus declares YaHuWaH of hosts, “Return to Me,” declares YaHuWaH of hosts, “that I may return to you,” says YaHuWaH of hosts.’”

✅ Mutual restoration is based on direct return to YaHuWaH—no priest, no mediator, just obedience and relationship.

Unlearn, Deprogram, and Re-think EVERYTHING you were taught!

At WOTR, we don’t position ourselves as self-professed prophets, teachers, leaders, or mentors, nor do we affiliate with any specific group, sect, religion, or recruitment center. Our goal is not to instruct but to offer a platform for exploration and education. We provide information across a wide range of topics using resources like the Hebrew Bible, Scholarly articles, Strong's Concordance, Encyclopedia Britannica, dictionaries, word etymology, and other trusted references.

These tools are here to help you broaden your perspective and engage critically with the material, empowering you to make informed decisions on your life journey. Our core values and unwavering trust are rooted in the unchanging Hebrew ToRaH of the Creator and God of Israel. We strongly encourage everyone to measure all opinions against this widely accepted foundation, for who would question the instructions of the Creator of all things?

There is no commandment in the Hebrew ToRaH from the God of Israel that requires Israelites to pray through an intermediary to commune with Him. Instead, the Hebrew TaNaKh emphasizes the importance of direct communication between the Nation of Israel, identified as the God of Israel’s son (Exodus 4:22-23 and Hosea 11:1), and YaHuWaH—much like the relationship between a father and his child—without the need for a mediator.

Ezekiel 18:30-32

30 Therefore I will judge you, O house of Israel, every one according to his ways, saith the YaHuWaH God. Repent, and turn yourselves from all your transgressions; so iniquity shall not be your ruin.

31 Cast away from you all your transgressions, whereby ye have transgressed; and make you a new heart and a new spirit: for why will ye die, O house of Israel?

32 For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith YaHuWaH God: wherefore turn yourselves, and live ye.

BaT DaBaR 7:14 “2 Chronicles” Hebrew TaNaKh

14 When my people, who bear MY NAME humble themselves, pray, and seek my favor and TURN from their evil ways; I will hear in my heavenly abode, and FORGIVE their sins, and will heal their land.

 MaKhiYaH 6:8 “Micah”

8 He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth YaHuWaH require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy ALuWaH?

ZaMaR 119:10-11 “Psalm”

10 With my whole heart have I sought thee: O let me not wander from thy commandments.

11 Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee.

Psalm 119:10-11 expresses a deep commitment to seeking and following YaHuWaH's commandments. The psalmist declares that he has wholeheartedly sought after YaHuWaH alone, and asks not to be led astray from His ToRaH. Furthermore, the psalmist has treasured YaHuWaH's word in their heart to avoid sinning against Him, showing a desire to live righteously by keeping the God of Israel’s ToRaH close.